This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Selected anniversaries for the "On this day" section of the Main Page
|
Please read the selected anniversaries guidelines before editing this box. |
April 19: Feast day of Saint Alphege of Canterbury (Catholicism, Anglicanism), Education and Sharing Day in the United States (2024), Primrose Day in London
|
Listed here, but pending an article. Rklawton 01:03, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
May I ask why Zola Levitt's death on April 19th 2006 was taken off? Colonel Marksman 23:00, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Whoever keeps re-writing the April 19 entry for "Bay of Pigs" has an indefensible position: that of the invasion being a failure. The fact is that the "defense" against the invasion was a success. The Bay of Pigs entry should reflect the success of the repelling of the attack, rather than the attack being a "failure". —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Horse Badorties ( talk • contribs) 02:48, 21 April 2007 (UTC).
I received this message:
Please stop changing the Bay of Pigs entry. Its obvious that whenever an invasion fails, the invaders are the ones who lost. Insinuating that Cubans won an invasion is POV pushing. Gdo01 02:47, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
The problem is that describing the "invasion" as such leads us to viewing it only as a success or failure from the POV of the invaders. It's almost as if the efforts of the Cubans to defend themselves is irrelevant.
I think it's better to present the invasion as the illegal act that it was, and present it as a successful repelling of an illegal invasion, which is exactly what it was, sans POV.
Novelty songwriter Dickie Goodman appears to have been born twice - once in 1932, and again in 1934! Mark Sublette ( talk) 22:17, 13 December 2007 (UTC). Incidentally, the reason I was checking this page is because I, too, was born this date. Mark Sublette ( talk) 10:37, 15 December 2007 (UTC)Mark Sublette
This event does not rise to the level of global notability. I can see no reason that this event would have any impact outside of Spain and why anyone outside of Spain would be interested in this event from a historical perspective. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 18:43, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
I still think the Málaga coach crash is notable. It is the worst traffic accident in Spain in seven years. The reason stated is "car crash in Spain is not really notable". Does a car crash killing nine people and injuring 38 have to happen in the USA to be "globally notable"? I just got back home from the local pub, and there I read the latest issue of Iltalehti, which had devoted over ten pages solely to this event! And you claim Wikipedia should just ignore it? JIP | Talk 19:26, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm wondering whether it would be possible to add a technology "anniversary" to the list. April 19, 1965 is the date of publication of Moore's law, as described by Gordon E. Moore in Electronics magazine. This year was the 50th anniversary of Moore's Law. Mary Mark Ockerbloom ( talk) 20:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
The only mention of any "celebration" is from 1906. I suggest it be removed from here.-- Richardson mcphillips ( talk) 19:16, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
From the link, this doesn't seem to be appropriate for this listing. Suggest it be removed.-- Richardson mcphillips ( talk) 13:48, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
The statement is made; "1529 – Beginning of the Protestant Reformation: "
The Germans just finished celebrating the beginning of the Protestant Reformation in 2017, the 600th anniversary of Martin Luther's 95 theses. It isn't clear in the statement in the article what it was that counts as the beginning of the Reformation. If ever there was a need for citations to justify an item, this is it.
Otherwise, I challenge it as not worthy of inclusion.
-- Vicedomino ( talk) 04:01, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
I'd be bold and would add it back myself, except article is semi-protected for some reason.
173.153.196.252 ( talk) 14:07, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
under "Holidays and observances" please add:
173.153.196.252 ( talk) 14:16, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
The entire subsection was removed, probably totally like accident like the last undocumented edit. I've restored it manually. 2600:1000:BE02:3ADA:94C6:93F2:2095:377C ( talk) 02:31, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. |
2600:1000:BE06:35EC:94C6:93F2:2095:377C ( talk) 03:33, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure Irene's conspiracy and the removal/blinding of Constantine VI took place on August 19, not April 19. 2600:4040:2486:2600:BD91:2F14:7AEA:25A7 ( talk) 18:29, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Selected anniversaries for the "On this day" section of the Main Page
|
Please read the selected anniversaries guidelines before editing this box. |
April 19: Feast day of Saint Alphege of Canterbury (Catholicism, Anglicanism), Education and Sharing Day in the United States (2024), Primrose Day in London
|
Listed here, but pending an article. Rklawton 01:03, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
May I ask why Zola Levitt's death on April 19th 2006 was taken off? Colonel Marksman 23:00, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Whoever keeps re-writing the April 19 entry for "Bay of Pigs" has an indefensible position: that of the invasion being a failure. The fact is that the "defense" against the invasion was a success. The Bay of Pigs entry should reflect the success of the repelling of the attack, rather than the attack being a "failure". —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Horse Badorties ( talk • contribs) 02:48, 21 April 2007 (UTC).
I received this message:
Please stop changing the Bay of Pigs entry. Its obvious that whenever an invasion fails, the invaders are the ones who lost. Insinuating that Cubans won an invasion is POV pushing. Gdo01 02:47, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
The problem is that describing the "invasion" as such leads us to viewing it only as a success or failure from the POV of the invaders. It's almost as if the efforts of the Cubans to defend themselves is irrelevant.
I think it's better to present the invasion as the illegal act that it was, and present it as a successful repelling of an illegal invasion, which is exactly what it was, sans POV.
Novelty songwriter Dickie Goodman appears to have been born twice - once in 1932, and again in 1934! Mark Sublette ( talk) 22:17, 13 December 2007 (UTC). Incidentally, the reason I was checking this page is because I, too, was born this date. Mark Sublette ( talk) 10:37, 15 December 2007 (UTC)Mark Sublette
This event does not rise to the level of global notability. I can see no reason that this event would have any impact outside of Spain and why anyone outside of Spain would be interested in this event from a historical perspective. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 18:43, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
I still think the Málaga coach crash is notable. It is the worst traffic accident in Spain in seven years. The reason stated is "car crash in Spain is not really notable". Does a car crash killing nine people and injuring 38 have to happen in the USA to be "globally notable"? I just got back home from the local pub, and there I read the latest issue of Iltalehti, which had devoted over ten pages solely to this event! And you claim Wikipedia should just ignore it? JIP | Talk 19:26, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm wondering whether it would be possible to add a technology "anniversary" to the list. April 19, 1965 is the date of publication of Moore's law, as described by Gordon E. Moore in Electronics magazine. This year was the 50th anniversary of Moore's Law. Mary Mark Ockerbloom ( talk) 20:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
The only mention of any "celebration" is from 1906. I suggest it be removed from here.-- Richardson mcphillips ( talk) 19:16, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
From the link, this doesn't seem to be appropriate for this listing. Suggest it be removed.-- Richardson mcphillips ( talk) 13:48, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
The statement is made; "1529 – Beginning of the Protestant Reformation: "
The Germans just finished celebrating the beginning of the Protestant Reformation in 2017, the 600th anniversary of Martin Luther's 95 theses. It isn't clear in the statement in the article what it was that counts as the beginning of the Reformation. If ever there was a need for citations to justify an item, this is it.
Otherwise, I challenge it as not worthy of inclusion.
-- Vicedomino ( talk) 04:01, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
I'd be bold and would add it back myself, except article is semi-protected for some reason.
173.153.196.252 ( talk) 14:07, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
under "Holidays and observances" please add:
173.153.196.252 ( talk) 14:16, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
The entire subsection was removed, probably totally like accident like the last undocumented edit. I've restored it manually. 2600:1000:BE02:3ADA:94C6:93F2:2095:377C ( talk) 02:31, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. |
2600:1000:BE06:35EC:94C6:93F2:2095:377C ( talk) 03:33, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure Irene's conspiracy and the removal/blinding of Constantine VI took place on August 19, not April 19. 2600:4040:2486:2600:BD91:2F14:7AEA:25A7 ( talk) 18:29, 19 April 2023 (UTC)