This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Litigation involving Apple Inc. article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
Litigation involving Apple Inc. was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Index
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
The Template:update maintenance tag puts into question the stability of the article (GA criterion 5)?. — Nemoschool ( talk) 09:00, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
The tag says that the article has needed to be updated (true) since 2014: 2 years after it passed GA nomination and 6 years ago, respectively, which is a criteria 3 issue. During this reassessment process, someone or some people should take up the mantle. Otherwise, it must be demoted. ⌚️ ( talk) 15:56, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
After new section entitled Cancellation of “Apple Music” trademark application was added, references are no longer consecutive and must be renumbered in this new section as follows: 2 must become 86, September 17, 2016 Office Action Outgoing must become 87, 3 to 88, 4 to 89, 5 to 90, 6 to 91. Thereafter, all subsequent references must be renumbered, i.e. 86 must become 92 et. seq. Contributor does not know how to do this and no template seems to be available. Contribute14 ( talk) 15:41, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The settlement was reached recently some $490M! what is the proposed benefit to shareholders? 2600:8800:9D80:4E:E4E3:BDEB:FE19:DD48 ( talk) 21:38, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Litigation involving Apple Inc. article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
Litigation involving Apple Inc. was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Index
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
The Template:update maintenance tag puts into question the stability of the article (GA criterion 5)?. — Nemoschool ( talk) 09:00, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
The tag says that the article has needed to be updated (true) since 2014: 2 years after it passed GA nomination and 6 years ago, respectively, which is a criteria 3 issue. During this reassessment process, someone or some people should take up the mantle. Otherwise, it must be demoted. ⌚️ ( talk) 15:56, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
After new section entitled Cancellation of “Apple Music” trademark application was added, references are no longer consecutive and must be renumbered in this new section as follows: 2 must become 86, September 17, 2016 Office Action Outgoing must become 87, 3 to 88, 4 to 89, 5 to 90, 6 to 91. Thereafter, all subsequent references must be renumbered, i.e. 86 must become 92 et. seq. Contributor does not know how to do this and no template seems to be available. Contribute14 ( talk) 15:41, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The settlement was reached recently some $490M! what is the proposed benefit to shareholders? 2600:8800:9D80:4E:E4E3:BDEB:FE19:DD48 ( talk) 21:38, 19 March 2024 (UTC)