This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why is there an uncaptioned portrait of an Egyptian woman in the infobox for this city?-- Jim10701 ( talk) 02:07, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
The section 'Relevance to Christian History' offers no references in support at all and fails to meet even the most basic requirements for either history, or Wikipedia.
"...hundreds of thousands of Christians were tortured and killed in the third and fourth centuries..." - should not be claimed without supporting evidence.
Unless this section is brought up to standard soon, I intend to either delete, or edit it heavily. - Extramural —Preceding undated comment added 21:49, 2 July 2010 (UTC).
Please do, it could really use a cleanup! Augustun84 ( talk) 05:00, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Antinopolis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:16, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: move the page to Antinoöpolis at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasu よ! 15:47, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Antinopolis → Antinoöpolis – Antinoöpolis makes better sense than "Antinopolis", which misses out two vowels and a whole syllable from the Greek's "Antinouopolis", and implies someone called "Antinus" is being comemorated, not Antinoös. This is dictionary style of the Oxford Classical Dictionary and all of the English-language citations on this page.
Antinoöpolis is the correct name of the city in English; named after the deified youth Antinoüs. The diaereses ö and ü are not foreign imports or archaisms but native English diacritics indicting that the second vowel is pronounced independently of the first, as in Greek, as in the names "Zoë" and "Chloë". "Antinopolis" appears to be a mistake, not spelled thus in any reliable source. GPinkerton ( talk) 00:27, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why is there an uncaptioned portrait of an Egyptian woman in the infobox for this city?-- Jim10701 ( talk) 02:07, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
The section 'Relevance to Christian History' offers no references in support at all and fails to meet even the most basic requirements for either history, or Wikipedia.
"...hundreds of thousands of Christians were tortured and killed in the third and fourth centuries..." - should not be claimed without supporting evidence.
Unless this section is brought up to standard soon, I intend to either delete, or edit it heavily. - Extramural —Preceding undated comment added 21:49, 2 July 2010 (UTC).
Please do, it could really use a cleanup! Augustun84 ( talk) 05:00, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Antinopolis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:16, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: move the page to Antinoöpolis at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasu よ! 15:47, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Antinopolis → Antinoöpolis – Antinoöpolis makes better sense than "Antinopolis", which misses out two vowels and a whole syllable from the Greek's "Antinouopolis", and implies someone called "Antinus" is being comemorated, not Antinoös. This is dictionary style of the Oxford Classical Dictionary and all of the English-language citations on this page.
Antinoöpolis is the correct name of the city in English; named after the deified youth Antinoüs. The diaereses ö and ü are not foreign imports or archaisms but native English diacritics indicting that the second vowel is pronounced independently of the first, as in Greek, as in the names "Zoë" and "Chloë". "Antinopolis" appears to be a mistake, not spelled thus in any reliable source. GPinkerton ( talk) 00:27, 19 January 2020 (UTC)