![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
This article is in serious need of reformatting. AllStarZ 04:39, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
The article Tank is far too large. Most of the tank#Vulnerability section should be merged here, leaving behind a concise summary. Any objections? — Michael Z. 2006-10-18 16:52 Z
this article has no refs and sound likes a non-formal lecturer please rewrite into a clearer, more formal format.
i recently deleted a sentence reading "The only thing that saved the south koreans and the americans from a total rout was a well organized retreat."
basically, the thing is, now matter how you put it, a retreat is a retreat. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zarzhu ( talk • contribs) 00:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Also, the WW2 section says: "...its allies in the West were resigned to its defeat by a numerically superior Wehrmacht...". That is wrong. In fact, the Allies outnumbered the Wehrmacht in both, men and machines (-tanks-), since the very beginning of the war. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.154.195.115 ( talk) 12:47, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
This can/needs to be REALLY expanded!-- mrg3105 ( comms) ♠♥♦♣ 07:09, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Steven J. Zaloga, in US [sic] Anti-tank Artillery 1941-45 (Oxford: Osprey, 2005), p.8, says the combination of rocket motor and shaped charge warhead leading to bazooka put an end to U.S. Army development of light antitank guns. I just can't figure out where to put it in... TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 09:16, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
== "Among novelties designed to defeat AT missiles, some tanks (like the M-84, Yugoslav variant of T-72) fitted advanced detection sensors which, when detecting high heat signatures of a missile launch, would automatically aim and fire machine guns at the source of the launch. Facing these tanks in large numbers during the Yugoslav wars, units fighting them adapted by either firing missiles and immediately moving or by firing multiple missiles at once, which overloaded the sensors."
That's just an urban legend. I've read that in quite many places, but haven't seen a single real source for it. I'm removing it. Latre ( talk) 17:37, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Whoever writes this might want to consider: Weapons of wars, terrorism and riots. Anti-tank weapons. (Molotov cocktails) http://www.winterwar.com/Weapons/FinAT/FINantitank2.htm#molotov 220.255.114.213 ( talk) 18:22, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Anti-tank warfare. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:22, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
I rewrote this as the material stays solid, as can be read eg. in the actuall article on shaped charges. This common misconception should not be spread.
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 06:17, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
This article is in serious need of reformatting. AllStarZ 04:39, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
The article Tank is far too large. Most of the tank#Vulnerability section should be merged here, leaving behind a concise summary. Any objections? — Michael Z. 2006-10-18 16:52 Z
this article has no refs and sound likes a non-formal lecturer please rewrite into a clearer, more formal format.
i recently deleted a sentence reading "The only thing that saved the south koreans and the americans from a total rout was a well organized retreat."
basically, the thing is, now matter how you put it, a retreat is a retreat. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zarzhu ( talk • contribs) 00:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Also, the WW2 section says: "...its allies in the West were resigned to its defeat by a numerically superior Wehrmacht...". That is wrong. In fact, the Allies outnumbered the Wehrmacht in both, men and machines (-tanks-), since the very beginning of the war. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.154.195.115 ( talk) 12:47, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
This can/needs to be REALLY expanded!-- mrg3105 ( comms) ♠♥♦♣ 07:09, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Steven J. Zaloga, in US [sic] Anti-tank Artillery 1941-45 (Oxford: Osprey, 2005), p.8, says the combination of rocket motor and shaped charge warhead leading to bazooka put an end to U.S. Army development of light antitank guns. I just can't figure out where to put it in... TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 09:16, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
== "Among novelties designed to defeat AT missiles, some tanks (like the M-84, Yugoslav variant of T-72) fitted advanced detection sensors which, when detecting high heat signatures of a missile launch, would automatically aim and fire machine guns at the source of the launch. Facing these tanks in large numbers during the Yugoslav wars, units fighting them adapted by either firing missiles and immediately moving or by firing multiple missiles at once, which overloaded the sensors."
That's just an urban legend. I've read that in quite many places, but haven't seen a single real source for it. I'm removing it. Latre ( talk) 17:37, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Whoever writes this might want to consider: Weapons of wars, terrorism and riots. Anti-tank weapons. (Molotov cocktails) http://www.winterwar.com/Weapons/FinAT/FINantitank2.htm#molotov 220.255.114.213 ( talk) 18:22, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Anti-tank warfare. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:22, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
I rewrote this as the material stays solid, as can be read eg. in the actuall article on shaped charges. This common misconception should not be spread.
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 06:17, 30 June 2021 (UTC)