This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The first section gives 19th. C dates, whereas the second section gives 18th C. dates. Are these two different events, or does one or the other section have incorrect dates? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Don Argus jr ( talk • contribs) 06:31, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
JGVR ( talk) 00:57, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
Why someone would think that it is a good idea to have duplicate articles with different names that will each end up edited in different ways, is beyond me. I am undoing the arbitrarily removed merge proposal in hopes a logical reason to have two of the same article is advanced JGVR ( talk) 02:37, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
JGVR ( talk) 02:48, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Anti-Rent War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:17, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
I am a history hobbyist chasing 70 years of age. I lived much of my younger years in upstate NY. There were "folk" legends linking the anti-rent riots with other radical movements happening in the upstate area during or in the near time. I heard claims linking these protests to abolitionism, women's rights, religious revivals, and the Oneida Community. There was certainly a lot of wild movements in the upstate area in the first half of the nineteenth century. I think that many of the very wealthy families from the N.Y. area felt they had a heritage connecting them to the old manor owners and they endowed many of the historical sites and societies in the upstate area. It seems reasonable that they might not have been thrilled with histories that painted the old manor owners as exploitive and disliked by the "lower" classes. Not perhaps out and out suppression but perhaps just a little downplaying.
For example, I lived for 7 years in Sullivan county and was told by several locals, Wurstboro was going to be named "Livingston Manor" by developers because it was thought to be a classy name for the growing resort businesses, but the Livingston family was remembered with so much hatred because their manor had either had been over that land or near it and the locals put up a fight. So the developers ended up giving the Livingston Manor name to a town the other side of the county. Again, I went to Lakeland High School in the town of Cortlandt, but we were told by older people to say we were from north of Peekskill because they said their grandparents hated the Cortlandt family. Supposedly this is why it is Lakeland School District and not the Cortlandt School District and the Peekskill riots are named for Peekskill and the not for Cortlandt where they actually happened. Finally, on a seperate subject there was a story of a murder related to the anti-rent movement in I think the 1880's, but you have everything calming down by 1850. Do you have any record of the fighting going on into the second half of the nineteenth century? 67.183.214.61 ( talk) 02:55, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The first section gives 19th. C dates, whereas the second section gives 18th C. dates. Are these two different events, or does one or the other section have incorrect dates? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Don Argus jr ( talk • contribs) 06:31, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
JGVR ( talk) 00:57, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
Why someone would think that it is a good idea to have duplicate articles with different names that will each end up edited in different ways, is beyond me. I am undoing the arbitrarily removed merge proposal in hopes a logical reason to have two of the same article is advanced JGVR ( talk) 02:37, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
JGVR ( talk) 02:48, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Anti-Rent War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:17, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
I am a history hobbyist chasing 70 years of age. I lived much of my younger years in upstate NY. There were "folk" legends linking the anti-rent riots with other radical movements happening in the upstate area during or in the near time. I heard claims linking these protests to abolitionism, women's rights, religious revivals, and the Oneida Community. There was certainly a lot of wild movements in the upstate area in the first half of the nineteenth century. I think that many of the very wealthy families from the N.Y. area felt they had a heritage connecting them to the old manor owners and they endowed many of the historical sites and societies in the upstate area. It seems reasonable that they might not have been thrilled with histories that painted the old manor owners as exploitive and disliked by the "lower" classes. Not perhaps out and out suppression but perhaps just a little downplaying.
For example, I lived for 7 years in Sullivan county and was told by several locals, Wurstboro was going to be named "Livingston Manor" by developers because it was thought to be a classy name for the growing resort businesses, but the Livingston family was remembered with so much hatred because their manor had either had been over that land or near it and the locals put up a fight. So the developers ended up giving the Livingston Manor name to a town the other side of the county. Again, I went to Lakeland High School in the town of Cortlandt, but we were told by older people to say we were from north of Peekskill because they said their grandparents hated the Cortlandt family. Supposedly this is why it is Lakeland School District and not the Cortlandt School District and the Peekskill riots are named for Peekskill and the not for Cortlandt where they actually happened. Finally, on a seperate subject there was a story of a murder related to the anti-rent movement in I think the 1880's, but you have everything calming down by 1850. Do you have any record of the fighting going on into the second half of the nineteenth century? 67.183.214.61 ( talk) 02:55, 10 February 2022 (UTC)