![]() | The contents of the Anneke Lucas page were merged into Positive criminology on 5 January 2017 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 20 December 2016. The result of the discussion was merge to Positive criminology. |
![]() | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Anneke Lucas redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Comments prior to merger / AfD decision
|
---|
== Sources that are not reliable, secondary sources == Here are the citations that I have removed because they are not reliable, secondary sources. Please note three things:
References
Work in progress.— CaroleHenson (talk) 01:35, 25 December 2016 (UTC) == Content I'm unable to find sources for ==
--— CaroleHenson (talk) 19:12, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
review (Flemish): https://ronnydeschepper.com/2010/07/04/de-dove-muzikant-door-anneke-lucas/ seller (Dutch): https://www.hebban.nl/boeken/de-dove-muzikant-a-lucas (removed link, book sold out: http://www.omero.nl/auteurs/l/u/lucas/de-dove-muzikant/) References
== Finding reliable, independent secondary sources == Copy of a post I made at WP:Articles for deletion/Anneke Lucas:
Dear
Carole,
|
As mentioned above, the AfD decision was to merge to the positive criminology article. This also included merging Prison Yoga Project, and James Fox (prison reform advocate) articles to Positive criminology. The content was moved with this edit.— CaroleHenson (talk) 12:15, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
You have vaporized an entire article about a woman because she spoke publicly about her childhood experiences. Since when would recorded, voluntary firsthand accounts not suffice to substantiate allegations, much less justify the elimination of an entire article that had already been in existence for months? This is flat-out censorship due to the sensitivity of the topic of child sex trafficking, and the corruption is transparent. Had the difficulty been inability to substantiate the claim, all that would have been required would have been the removal of the reference to her claim. Instead, you have chosen to wipe the memory of her from the website. Shameful conduct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.86.163.215 ( talk) 09:46, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
This page should not be speedily deleted because it contains reliable sources and a significant story about a woman who was trafficked. The woman is an activist and is a champion for gender equality and it should be considered. -- GretaIndie ( talk) 11:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This content was moved from User talk:CaroleHenson |
Hello Carole,
Is there any political motivation behind your decision to delete Anneke Lucas' article?
Please give me your phone number.
Thanks. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
GretaIndie (
talk •
contribs) 11:43, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
References
Why is her story deleted? Completely unacceptable. Good to know that wikipedia also sensors what they assume the public does not know. 160.93.12.5 ( talk) 16:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
![]() | The contents of the Anneke Lucas page were merged into Positive criminology on 5 January 2017 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 20 December 2016. The result of the discussion was merge to Positive criminology. |
![]() | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Anneke Lucas redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Comments prior to merger / AfD decision
|
---|
== Sources that are not reliable, secondary sources == Here are the citations that I have removed because they are not reliable, secondary sources. Please note three things:
References
Work in progress.— CaroleHenson (talk) 01:35, 25 December 2016 (UTC) == Content I'm unable to find sources for ==
--— CaroleHenson (talk) 19:12, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
review (Flemish): https://ronnydeschepper.com/2010/07/04/de-dove-muzikant-door-anneke-lucas/ seller (Dutch): https://www.hebban.nl/boeken/de-dove-muzikant-a-lucas (removed link, book sold out: http://www.omero.nl/auteurs/l/u/lucas/de-dove-muzikant/) References
== Finding reliable, independent secondary sources == Copy of a post I made at WP:Articles for deletion/Anneke Lucas:
Dear
Carole,
|
As mentioned above, the AfD decision was to merge to the positive criminology article. This also included merging Prison Yoga Project, and James Fox (prison reform advocate) articles to Positive criminology. The content was moved with this edit.— CaroleHenson (talk) 12:15, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
You have vaporized an entire article about a woman because she spoke publicly about her childhood experiences. Since when would recorded, voluntary firsthand accounts not suffice to substantiate allegations, much less justify the elimination of an entire article that had already been in existence for months? This is flat-out censorship due to the sensitivity of the topic of child sex trafficking, and the corruption is transparent. Had the difficulty been inability to substantiate the claim, all that would have been required would have been the removal of the reference to her claim. Instead, you have chosen to wipe the memory of her from the website. Shameful conduct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.86.163.215 ( talk) 09:46, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
This page should not be speedily deleted because it contains reliable sources and a significant story about a woman who was trafficked. The woman is an activist and is a champion for gender equality and it should be considered. -- GretaIndie ( talk) 11:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This content was moved from User talk:CaroleHenson |
Hello Carole,
Is there any political motivation behind your decision to delete Anneke Lucas' article?
Please give me your phone number.
Thanks. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
GretaIndie (
talk •
contribs) 11:43, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
References
Why is her story deleted? Completely unacceptable. Good to know that wikipedia also sensors what they assume the public does not know. 160.93.12.5 ( talk) 16:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)