This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Re "better description"
Ahem. User:Stumason, I'm not sure how visceral (Having to do with the viscera, which are the soft internal organs of the body, including the lungs, the heart, and the organs of the digestive, excretory, reproductive, and circulatory systems.) is a better description of something which sort of becomes spmething else than VIRTUAL. I think this is somewhat more appropriate. User:Megawattbulbman 15:37, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
Stop press, just saw it in a TV guide describing some programme... You're right, it is an appropriate description. Sorry!
I have heard that a theatre company called "We Could Be Kings" have been given the rights to adapt The Coma by Alex Garland into a stage play. It is going to debut for the first time ever at The Pleasance for The Edinburgh Festival this year. Check it out!
I have rewritten the first paragraph and the start of the second paragraph. The following text appears to have been lifted from http://www.spikemagazine.com/0599alexgarland.php
Revision where this text was added: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Alex_Garland&oldid=15175985
Claudine ( talk) 00:39, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
Wasn't there info on this page about his involvement in the Halo film? If not, there should be. - Gerald
My work seem to either droop over the page or disappear completely. Can somebody help me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martin287 ( talk • contribs) 09:26, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
This section is ponderously and clumsily written in places. Anyone feel like fixing it? Notreallydavid ( talk) 02:12, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
It is redirecting it to a page on sunlight due to the similarity in words instead of to the movie, linked here:
/info/en/?search=Sunshine_(2007_film)
I don't know how to fix this exactly, the only thing showing is Sunshine and I don't want to mess anything up. Help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azeotrope288391 ( talk • contribs) 04:46, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
It has been reveled that Garland is currently working on an adaption of Annihilation so I added a paragraph to the screenplays section. SpiritedMichelle ( talk) 19:00, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
The Beach was initially met with positive reviews, and with a spreading word of mouth response the novel grew into a cult classic.
That reads as if "cult classic" is a synonym for "best seller". Well, that's what the term is often loosely used to mean these days; anything that sells well is immediately branded a "cult classic". But is that what we actually mean here? There's more to a cult classic than something that sells a lot of copies. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 20:42, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
It says on the entry that Garland may possibly direct The Tourist (infamous unproduced script by Clair Noto), but it's unsourced and I can't find anything about it in a quick Google search. Anybody know anything? If not I'm gonna nix it from the page. PcPrincipal ( talk) 21:33, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 16:08, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
They announced a possible 28 Years Later movie/trilogy. This should maybe be added? https://www.ign.com/articles/28-years-later-sequel Ansarya ( talk) 08:28, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Not happy that this English lad, is writing about a very sensitive issue. I think this is incendiary and inflammatory.. and I haven't ever seen the movie! 2600:1702:3160:A470:3190:FE67:C2CE:69DB ( talk) 22:08, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Re "better description"
Ahem. User:Stumason, I'm not sure how visceral (Having to do with the viscera, which are the soft internal organs of the body, including the lungs, the heart, and the organs of the digestive, excretory, reproductive, and circulatory systems.) is a better description of something which sort of becomes spmething else than VIRTUAL. I think this is somewhat more appropriate. User:Megawattbulbman 15:37, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
Stop press, just saw it in a TV guide describing some programme... You're right, it is an appropriate description. Sorry!
I have heard that a theatre company called "We Could Be Kings" have been given the rights to adapt The Coma by Alex Garland into a stage play. It is going to debut for the first time ever at The Pleasance for The Edinburgh Festival this year. Check it out!
I have rewritten the first paragraph and the start of the second paragraph. The following text appears to have been lifted from http://www.spikemagazine.com/0599alexgarland.php
Revision where this text was added: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Alex_Garland&oldid=15175985
Claudine ( talk) 00:39, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
Wasn't there info on this page about his involvement in the Halo film? If not, there should be. - Gerald
My work seem to either droop over the page or disappear completely. Can somebody help me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martin287 ( talk • contribs) 09:26, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
This section is ponderously and clumsily written in places. Anyone feel like fixing it? Notreallydavid ( talk) 02:12, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
It is redirecting it to a page on sunlight due to the similarity in words instead of to the movie, linked here:
/info/en/?search=Sunshine_(2007_film)
I don't know how to fix this exactly, the only thing showing is Sunshine and I don't want to mess anything up. Help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azeotrope288391 ( talk • contribs) 04:46, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
It has been reveled that Garland is currently working on an adaption of Annihilation so I added a paragraph to the screenplays section. SpiritedMichelle ( talk) 19:00, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
The Beach was initially met with positive reviews, and with a spreading word of mouth response the novel grew into a cult classic.
That reads as if "cult classic" is a synonym for "best seller". Well, that's what the term is often loosely used to mean these days; anything that sells well is immediately branded a "cult classic". But is that what we actually mean here? There's more to a cult classic than something that sells a lot of copies. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 20:42, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
It says on the entry that Garland may possibly direct The Tourist (infamous unproduced script by Clair Noto), but it's unsourced and I can't find anything about it in a quick Google search. Anybody know anything? If not I'm gonna nix it from the page. PcPrincipal ( talk) 21:33, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 16:08, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
They announced a possible 28 Years Later movie/trilogy. This should maybe be added? https://www.ign.com/articles/28-years-later-sequel Ansarya ( talk) 08:28, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Not happy that this English lad, is writing about a very sensitive issue. I think this is incendiary and inflammatory.. and I haven't ever seen the movie! 2600:1702:3160:A470:3190:FE67:C2CE:69DB ( talk) 22:08, 27 March 2024 (UTC)