![]() | Aletta Jacobs has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
June 11, 2019. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Dutch physician
Aletta Jacobs's legal challenge to be added to the Amsterdam electoral rolls backfired, leading to a
constitutional amendment granting voting rights to men only? | |||||||||
![]() | Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on February 9, 2019, August 10, 2023, and February 9, 2024. |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Women in Red: Focus on Suffrage (2019) | |||
|
Jacobs wasn´t the first Dutch female university student, but she was the first one who completed a university study. See the Dutch Wikipedia-entry for details.
FB
This article is full of floral language and has very few inline citations. Very upsetting considering the importance of this historical figure. I am sure the ultra-rightwing and the anti-Jewish segments of the internet are having a ball vandalizing this page on a regular basis, so maybe it needs to be locked until a scholar can get a hold of it. 173.164.81.245 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:56, 20 March 2012 (UTC).
"|influences = people to be amazed by dogs" Looks like vandalism to me, I removed it. -- 78.23.113.239 ( talk) 11:30, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Two of the three links don't work anymore: Sunshine women and Memoirs.-- Ornig ( talk) 14:58, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
I don't know who wrote this, but "suffrage feminine" simply isn't English! 213.127.210.95 ( talk) 21:21, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Aletta Jacobs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:26, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
I'm not comfortable with this sentence:
"Finding the trial was successful, she introduced the method of birth control in the Netherlands (still widely known as the Dutch Cap)[2] and began counseling women on its use.[11]"
I'm sorry to be picky because as far as I can see overall you've performed a formidable rescue mission on the entry. But - not for the first time - having had a thought I get an overwhelming urge to share. Feel free to ignore if you don't agree. I don't have access to your source, so I didn't attempt to edit your text. AND very best wishes for what remains of 2019! Charles01 ( talk) 20:09, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Valereee ( talk · contribs) 19:10, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | well-written, clear, very accessible considering how many long Dutch organization names are necessarily included |
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | |
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | |
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. |
In Early life: "While working as an apprentice dressmaker, she therefore continued her studies at home, where her mother taught her French and German." I can see this was a difficult sentence to cast. The 'therefore' refers to the previous sentence rather than the first phrase of this sentence. I'm trying to figure out how this could be recast. -- valereee ( talk) 19:15, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
The final quote -- it was published in 1996, but do we know when she wrote it? -- valereee ( talk) 20:04, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
From Early life and education: "When within months, news reached Jacobs' father that Thorbecke was mortally ill, Abraham insisted that his daughter be allowed to register without probation." Does the source say why? Like maybe he worried that with Thorbecke dead, whoever succeeded him would renege on the deal? -- valereee ( talk) 14:36, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Something, that can be added in all probabilities. Another potential good source is Rupp, Leila J., 1950- (1997).
Worlds of women : the making of an international women's movement. Princeton University Press.
ISBN
0691016763.
OCLC
36800553.{{
cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (
link); I read it quite long back but AFAIR, it throws much light on Jacobs' personal life and relations with contemporaries.
∯WBG
converse
16:21, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
![]() | Aletta Jacobs has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
June 11, 2019. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Dutch physician
Aletta Jacobs's legal challenge to be added to the Amsterdam electoral rolls backfired, leading to a
constitutional amendment granting voting rights to men only? | |||||||||
![]() | Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on February 9, 2019, August 10, 2023, and February 9, 2024. |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Women in Red: Focus on Suffrage (2019) | |||
|
Jacobs wasn´t the first Dutch female university student, but she was the first one who completed a university study. See the Dutch Wikipedia-entry for details.
FB
This article is full of floral language and has very few inline citations. Very upsetting considering the importance of this historical figure. I am sure the ultra-rightwing and the anti-Jewish segments of the internet are having a ball vandalizing this page on a regular basis, so maybe it needs to be locked until a scholar can get a hold of it. 173.164.81.245 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:56, 20 March 2012 (UTC).
"|influences = people to be amazed by dogs" Looks like vandalism to me, I removed it. -- 78.23.113.239 ( talk) 11:30, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Two of the three links don't work anymore: Sunshine women and Memoirs.-- Ornig ( talk) 14:58, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
I don't know who wrote this, but "suffrage feminine" simply isn't English! 213.127.210.95 ( talk) 21:21, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Aletta Jacobs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:26, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
I'm not comfortable with this sentence:
"Finding the trial was successful, she introduced the method of birth control in the Netherlands (still widely known as the Dutch Cap)[2] and began counseling women on its use.[11]"
I'm sorry to be picky because as far as I can see overall you've performed a formidable rescue mission on the entry. But - not for the first time - having had a thought I get an overwhelming urge to share. Feel free to ignore if you don't agree. I don't have access to your source, so I didn't attempt to edit your text. AND very best wishes for what remains of 2019! Charles01 ( talk) 20:09, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Valereee ( talk · contribs) 19:10, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | well-written, clear, very accessible considering how many long Dutch organization names are necessarily included |
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | |
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | |
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. |
In Early life: "While working as an apprentice dressmaker, she therefore continued her studies at home, where her mother taught her French and German." I can see this was a difficult sentence to cast. The 'therefore' refers to the previous sentence rather than the first phrase of this sentence. I'm trying to figure out how this could be recast. -- valereee ( talk) 19:15, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
The final quote -- it was published in 1996, but do we know when she wrote it? -- valereee ( talk) 20:04, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
From Early life and education: "When within months, news reached Jacobs' father that Thorbecke was mortally ill, Abraham insisted that his daughter be allowed to register without probation." Does the source say why? Like maybe he worried that with Thorbecke dead, whoever succeeded him would renege on the deal? -- valereee ( talk) 14:36, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Something, that can be added in all probabilities. Another potential good source is Rupp, Leila J., 1950- (1997).
Worlds of women : the making of an international women's movement. Princeton University Press.
ISBN
0691016763.
OCLC
36800553.{{
cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (
link); I read it quite long back but AFAIR, it throws much light on Jacobs' personal life and relations with contemporaries.
∯WBG
converse
16:21, 2 May 2019 (UTC)