This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to
participate, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project, participate in
relevant discussions, and see
lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 13:41, June 20, 2024 (
JST,
Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (There is no promotional content on this page, it is quite plainly informative) --
MargaritaPoppa (
talk) 09:22, 7 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Further cleanup done, references added.
MargaritaPoppa (
talk) 09:37, 7 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Quoting the tag request removal of speedy deletion template "...the mere fact that a company, organization, or product is a page's subject does not, on its own, qualify that article for deletion under this criterion..."
MargaritaPoppa (
talk) 09:57, 7 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... the sources cited are from Asia, Europe and North America. Sources are allowed to be biased, but not Wikipedia articles. We write all opinions like opinions, facts like facts, and heavily contested facts not like facts.
Neutral point of view is about writing all significant points of view from a fair and unbiased perspective that doesn't
promote or
give undue weight to anything, even though I may have never heard of the company before. -- AI RPer (talk) 10:40, 7 October 2016 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to
participate, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project, participate in
relevant discussions, and see
lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 13:41, June 20, 2024 (
JST,
Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (There is no promotional content on this page, it is quite plainly informative) --
MargaritaPoppa (
talk) 09:22, 7 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Further cleanup done, references added.
MargaritaPoppa (
talk) 09:37, 7 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Quoting the tag request removal of speedy deletion template "...the mere fact that a company, organization, or product is a page's subject does not, on its own, qualify that article for deletion under this criterion..."
MargaritaPoppa (
talk) 09:57, 7 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... the sources cited are from Asia, Europe and North America. Sources are allowed to be biased, but not Wikipedia articles. We write all opinions like opinions, facts like facts, and heavily contested facts not like facts.
Neutral point of view is about writing all significant points of view from a fair and unbiased perspective that doesn't
promote or
give undue weight to anything, even though I may have never heard of the company before. -- AI RPer (talk) 10:40, 7 October 2016 (UTC)reply