Agneepath (2012 film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
An image used in this article,
File:Agneepath1.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
| |
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (
commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 06:40, 25 July 2011 (UTC) |
An image used in this article, File:Agneepath 2012.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 07:43, 9 December 2011 (UTC) |
An image used in this article, File:Agnip.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 17:02, 21 December 2011 (UTC) |
I added table for critical review section. Table was with 4 columns: Source, Reviewer name, Rating & Comments. It is easier for anyone read details in table. Someone changed it, surprising the user is not even registered user. My effort has gone in vain now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Strong finance ( talk • contribs) 12:06, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello! The standard critical reception is not in tables, but is in the written form. Tables are usually used in compiling forms of data. Please understand that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.92.93.92 ( talk) 17:38, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Why is no one talking about the systematic and deliberate side-stepping of the fact that this supposed "good article" has no explanation/commentary on the poem which is the most vital aspect of the movie? There is even this one user who deletes every source provided and refuses to come up with a good source of his own. 117.192.24.71 ( talk) 16:49, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
I'm not an expert on Indian cinema revenues by any means, but the gross revenues reported at [1] don't seem to agree to the current figures on this page. Also, the page says "nett" (typo: should be "net"), but the source appears to refer to gross. We should reach concensus on the correct figures to report before any further edits are made to the page. I've seen several edits to this (and reversions) on RC. I'm hoping there's an expert out there that can sort this out! -- a kendall 10:41, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Please update the correct revenue that is showing in http://www.boxofficeindia.com the most authentic source for indian box office collection for worldwide collection you can use other source. The revenue after 2nd week alone in indian box office is 114 crore as reported on http://www.boxofficeindia.com site. Don't Report wrong collection here. for worlwide collection it is already 145 + . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.203.203.252 ( talk) 17:48, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Ankitbhatt ( talk · contribs) 09:03, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Nice to see this article being put up for a GA review. I just read the lead section and found a number of problems, listed below :-
This is just one part. More to come. Hopefully these issues can be fixed in a day or two. Cheers. ~*~ Ankit Bhatt~*~ 09:03, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for starting the GA Review. The above mentioned issues have been fixed. Have a look. Smarojit ( talk) 13:38, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
In fact, come to think of it, this article needs a thorough copy-edit. I can see a number of grammar mistakes, and I have barely started reading the article. In fact, I am really surprised that there has been no peer review for the article prior to the GAN. I would suggest halting this GAN, having a thorough peer review and then re-nominating the article. If you wish, I could carry out a peer review, but I can't do it here since it will be too long IMO. ~*~ Ankit Bhatt~*~ 08:33, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
More to come; hard-pressed for time now. ~*~ Ankit Bhatt~*~ 04:22, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
More to come. ~*~ Ankit Bhatt~*~ 08:27, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
I guess this will be the final batch of comments :-
Other than this, I see no problem left with the article. Its well-written, quite comprehensive and interesting. Rectifications are done promptly, and I can see eagerness to push this article to even higher standards. In short, excellent work. Keep it up :). ~*~ Ankit Bhatt~*~ 12:30, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
I have gone through the article one last time. All I see is a small problem regarding the italicization of references, and I will assume that this aspect, with a little guidance, can be overcome.
Prose is pretty good, engaging, flowing.
Sources of good quality, properly cited using accepted templates.
Covers all aspects of the film (as far as I am aware). Reveals quite a bit to uninitiated readers.
Neutral in tone. No vandalism-based fanboyism/hatred which is so common in Indian film articles.
No edit-warring visible. Time elapsed since release is quite a lot. Very remote possibility of sudden spurt in vandalism or other unwanted editing.
All images non-free, but have necessary and valid rationales. Though a bit high in number considering the length of this article, I'll let this be.
In short, this passes all the good article criteria and is certainly ready for higher standards. Congratulations. Article -
~*~ Ankit Bhatt~*~ 15:13, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
I just saw that the article is GAN, hence I wish to list out a small bit of concerns which I have. Here is my quick take :
Secret of success ( talk) 17:26, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Some things I would like to add to your comments:
Smarojit ( talk) 04:12, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
I do not have any problem with the lead as of now, but regarding the U/A certificate, could you give a source for that? How exactly was it different from the past U/A disclaimers? Moving on, why is flipkart a reliable source, be it for budget or anything else? I see that the lyrics have been removed. Guess no more problems with that. Secret of success ( talk) 15:51, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
The boxoffice section needs a little change as some movies released and grossed more than agneepath comparatively. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 07:23, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can someone please edit the awards section of this page? It looks like it has only added the negative awards, which does not make sense. Otherwise, I think it should be removed. Aobero4 ( talk) 21:04, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Agneepath (2012 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:45, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Agneepath (2012 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://agneepaththefilm.com/When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:42, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 06:09, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
The redirect Agneepath(2012 film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 17 § Agneepath(2012 film) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 ( talk) 05:34, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Agneepath (2012 film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
An image used in this article,
File:Agneepath1.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
| |
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (
commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 06:40, 25 July 2011 (UTC) |
An image used in this article, File:Agneepath 2012.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 07:43, 9 December 2011 (UTC) |
An image used in this article, File:Agnip.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 17:02, 21 December 2011 (UTC) |
I added table for critical review section. Table was with 4 columns: Source, Reviewer name, Rating & Comments. It is easier for anyone read details in table. Someone changed it, surprising the user is not even registered user. My effort has gone in vain now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Strong finance ( talk • contribs) 12:06, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello! The standard critical reception is not in tables, but is in the written form. Tables are usually used in compiling forms of data. Please understand that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.92.93.92 ( talk) 17:38, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Why is no one talking about the systematic and deliberate side-stepping of the fact that this supposed "good article" has no explanation/commentary on the poem which is the most vital aspect of the movie? There is even this one user who deletes every source provided and refuses to come up with a good source of his own. 117.192.24.71 ( talk) 16:49, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
I'm not an expert on Indian cinema revenues by any means, but the gross revenues reported at [1] don't seem to agree to the current figures on this page. Also, the page says "nett" (typo: should be "net"), but the source appears to refer to gross. We should reach concensus on the correct figures to report before any further edits are made to the page. I've seen several edits to this (and reversions) on RC. I'm hoping there's an expert out there that can sort this out! -- a kendall 10:41, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Please update the correct revenue that is showing in http://www.boxofficeindia.com the most authentic source for indian box office collection for worldwide collection you can use other source. The revenue after 2nd week alone in indian box office is 114 crore as reported on http://www.boxofficeindia.com site. Don't Report wrong collection here. for worlwide collection it is already 145 + . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.203.203.252 ( talk) 17:48, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Ankitbhatt ( talk · contribs) 09:03, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Nice to see this article being put up for a GA review. I just read the lead section and found a number of problems, listed below :-
This is just one part. More to come. Hopefully these issues can be fixed in a day or two. Cheers. ~*~ Ankit Bhatt~*~ 09:03, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for starting the GA Review. The above mentioned issues have been fixed. Have a look. Smarojit ( talk) 13:38, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
In fact, come to think of it, this article needs a thorough copy-edit. I can see a number of grammar mistakes, and I have barely started reading the article. In fact, I am really surprised that there has been no peer review for the article prior to the GAN. I would suggest halting this GAN, having a thorough peer review and then re-nominating the article. If you wish, I could carry out a peer review, but I can't do it here since it will be too long IMO. ~*~ Ankit Bhatt~*~ 08:33, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
More to come; hard-pressed for time now. ~*~ Ankit Bhatt~*~ 04:22, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
More to come. ~*~ Ankit Bhatt~*~ 08:27, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
I guess this will be the final batch of comments :-
Other than this, I see no problem left with the article. Its well-written, quite comprehensive and interesting. Rectifications are done promptly, and I can see eagerness to push this article to even higher standards. In short, excellent work. Keep it up :). ~*~ Ankit Bhatt~*~ 12:30, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
I have gone through the article one last time. All I see is a small problem regarding the italicization of references, and I will assume that this aspect, with a little guidance, can be overcome.
Prose is pretty good, engaging, flowing.
Sources of good quality, properly cited using accepted templates.
Covers all aspects of the film (as far as I am aware). Reveals quite a bit to uninitiated readers.
Neutral in tone. No vandalism-based fanboyism/hatred which is so common in Indian film articles.
No edit-warring visible. Time elapsed since release is quite a lot. Very remote possibility of sudden spurt in vandalism or other unwanted editing.
All images non-free, but have necessary and valid rationales. Though a bit high in number considering the length of this article, I'll let this be.
In short, this passes all the good article criteria and is certainly ready for higher standards. Congratulations. Article -
~*~ Ankit Bhatt~*~ 15:13, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
I just saw that the article is GAN, hence I wish to list out a small bit of concerns which I have. Here is my quick take :
Secret of success ( talk) 17:26, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Some things I would like to add to your comments:
Smarojit ( talk) 04:12, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
I do not have any problem with the lead as of now, but regarding the U/A certificate, could you give a source for that? How exactly was it different from the past U/A disclaimers? Moving on, why is flipkart a reliable source, be it for budget or anything else? I see that the lyrics have been removed. Guess no more problems with that. Secret of success ( talk) 15:51, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
The boxoffice section needs a little change as some movies released and grossed more than agneepath comparatively. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 07:23, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can someone please edit the awards section of this page? It looks like it has only added the negative awards, which does not make sense. Otherwise, I think it should be removed. Aobero4 ( talk) 21:04, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Agneepath (2012 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:45, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Agneepath (2012 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://agneepaththefilm.com/When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:42, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 06:09, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
The redirect Agneepath(2012 film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 17 § Agneepath(2012 film) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 ( talk) 05:34, 17 January 2024 (UTC)