This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all
disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the
discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can
join the discussion and see lists of
open tasks and
regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the
documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the
guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
Creation of new pages for each film
I've created a new page for each of the three versions of this film. Naturally there are a lot of pages which will link back to this page, so before anyone starts yelling at me about this, rest assured, I intend to go back and fix all the links. There are a lot though, so it will take a little time, but I am onto it. So please, no nasty messages like I've had in the past, ok? ;-)
Rossrs13:41, 17 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Rossrs, I congratulate you on
being bold by going ahead and creating three separate pages for the three films. I firmly believe that every film should have their own wiki article including remakes, so well done. However, I'm going to make one tiny change. According to the naming conventions for films, all every word in the film's title is to be capitalised except,
conjunctions (and, but, or, nor, for, yet, so),
prepositions (
to, over, through) or
articles (an, a, the, that, any, some, one, these, those). Therefore, since the word "is" isn't a conjunction, preposition or an article, the word is to be in capitals. --
Ianblair23(talk)02:11, 18 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Thanks Ian. Well, I wasn't sure what was the right convention, so thanks for fixing these articles. I'll ensure that all the links are fixed over the next few days also.
Rossrs02:41, 18 December 2005 (UTC)reply
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all
disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the
discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can
join the discussion and see lists of
open tasks and
regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the
documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the
guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
Creation of new pages for each film
I've created a new page for each of the three versions of this film. Naturally there are a lot of pages which will link back to this page, so before anyone starts yelling at me about this, rest assured, I intend to go back and fix all the links. There are a lot though, so it will take a little time, but I am onto it. So please, no nasty messages like I've had in the past, ok? ;-)
Rossrs13:41, 17 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Rossrs, I congratulate you on
being bold by going ahead and creating three separate pages for the three films. I firmly believe that every film should have their own wiki article including remakes, so well done. However, I'm going to make one tiny change. According to the naming conventions for films, all every word in the film's title is to be capitalised except,
conjunctions (and, but, or, nor, for, yet, so),
prepositions (
to, over, through) or
articles (an, a, the, that, any, some, one, these, those). Therefore, since the word "is" isn't a conjunction, preposition or an article, the word is to be in capitals. --
Ianblair23(talk)02:11, 18 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Thanks Ian. Well, I wasn't sure what was the right convention, so thanks for fixing these articles. I'll ensure that all the links are fixed over the next few days also.
Rossrs02:41, 18 December 2005 (UTC)reply