![]() | 420 (Family Guy) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Please add the proper sources for the following, and please do not put it in list form. Thank you. Sarujo ( talk) 14:11, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
Wondering what it would take to get this article up to Good status. Looking at other Good Family Guy articles, it appears the addition of the 'Cultural references' section with proper sources (see above) and a 'Production' section are needed. With the addition of those, and perhaps a bit of expansion in the 'Ratings and reception' section, this article should be able to obtain Good status. -- Another Believer ( Talk) 19:43, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Twice now, edits have been made regarding the re-airing of this episode and its delay due to the death of Michael Jackson. I do feel this could be relevant, but is there a reliable, third-party source that discusses this? If not, I don't think it should be included in the article. Any thoughts? -- Another Believer ( Talk) 16:47, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
The notification is above. Please take your time to review. Railer-man ( talk) 16:51, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk) 19:15, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
I'll be reviewing this article shortly. I'll give it a read through now and add points below as I see them. If theres any straight forward copyedits needed, I'll make them as I go through, but obviously if I inadvertently change something important, please feel free to revert. Miyagawa (talk) 19:15, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Review: Plot: First line - is it possible to rephrase the second appearance of "friend" as it seems a bit repetitive.
Production: Could you re-work the first paragraph, and it comes over a bit like a list of the production crew with the line breaks removed.
Production: Second paragraph - seems set up at the end for a quote, but there isn't one.
Other than those points, I think its a job well done and very close to meeting the the GA standard. Nice work! Miyagawa (talk) 19:28, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
In agreement with the points raised by Queenieacoustic, those will need to be addressed as well - particulary the lack of real production information. If you take a look at other episode GA's, I'm sure you'll find a number of examples of what should be in there. Miyagawa (talk) 12:54, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
I'm going to fail this article on it's Good Article Nomination for the time being and leave it to the editors involved above to work the article up and renominate at a suitable time. Miyagawa (talk) 20:18, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
The notification is above. Please take your time to review. Railer-man ( talk) 16:11, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: That Ole Cheesy Dude ( Talk to the hand!) 17:10, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I'll be reviewing this article. There are a few problems with prose and only one major problem (discussed in general comments section)
Fabulous work! And it's passed! That Ole Cheesy Dude ( Talk to the hand!) 06:07, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
Removed {{Good article}}. The article does not meet criterion for Good article status. The plot section has no references. Per good article criterion, good articles need to be "Factually accurate and verifiable: (a) it provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout;
An easy fail, a section that's entirely unreferenced. Northamerica1000 ( talk) 11:39, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 420 (Family Guy). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:24, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 420 (Family Guy). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:59, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
The article doesn't mention this bit; the crudely animated insert in which the man and his dog discuss weed (the conversation presented in written form rather than being spoken). Presumably this is a reference to something. If so, what? Martyn Smith ( talk) 08:14, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Done a bit of research and have added a relevant comment within the article Martyn Smith ( talk) 09:42, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 07:22, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Consensus to move to "420 (Family Guy)" ( non-admin closure) b uidh e 23:20, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Episode 420 (Family Guy) → Episode 420 – " Episode 420" already redirects straight here, it's pointless to have the page's title specificity the series. Grapesoda22 ( talk) 21:26, 31 May 2020 (UTC) Grapesoda22 ( talk) 21:26, 31 May 2020 (UTC)—Relisting. Mdaniels5757 ( talk) 20:03, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Episode 420. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 21#Episode 420 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. --
IJBall (
contribs •
talk)
20:57, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
![]() | 420 (Family Guy) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Please add the proper sources for the following, and please do not put it in list form. Thank you. Sarujo ( talk) 14:11, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
Wondering what it would take to get this article up to Good status. Looking at other Good Family Guy articles, it appears the addition of the 'Cultural references' section with proper sources (see above) and a 'Production' section are needed. With the addition of those, and perhaps a bit of expansion in the 'Ratings and reception' section, this article should be able to obtain Good status. -- Another Believer ( Talk) 19:43, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Twice now, edits have been made regarding the re-airing of this episode and its delay due to the death of Michael Jackson. I do feel this could be relevant, but is there a reliable, third-party source that discusses this? If not, I don't think it should be included in the article. Any thoughts? -- Another Believer ( Talk) 16:47, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
The notification is above. Please take your time to review. Railer-man ( talk) 16:51, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk) 19:15, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
I'll be reviewing this article shortly. I'll give it a read through now and add points below as I see them. If theres any straight forward copyedits needed, I'll make them as I go through, but obviously if I inadvertently change something important, please feel free to revert. Miyagawa (talk) 19:15, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Review: Plot: First line - is it possible to rephrase the second appearance of "friend" as it seems a bit repetitive.
Production: Could you re-work the first paragraph, and it comes over a bit like a list of the production crew with the line breaks removed.
Production: Second paragraph - seems set up at the end for a quote, but there isn't one.
Other than those points, I think its a job well done and very close to meeting the the GA standard. Nice work! Miyagawa (talk) 19:28, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
In agreement with the points raised by Queenieacoustic, those will need to be addressed as well - particulary the lack of real production information. If you take a look at other episode GA's, I'm sure you'll find a number of examples of what should be in there. Miyagawa (talk) 12:54, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
I'm going to fail this article on it's Good Article Nomination for the time being and leave it to the editors involved above to work the article up and renominate at a suitable time. Miyagawa (talk) 20:18, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
The notification is above. Please take your time to review. Railer-man ( talk) 16:11, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: That Ole Cheesy Dude ( Talk to the hand!) 17:10, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I'll be reviewing this article. There are a few problems with prose and only one major problem (discussed in general comments section)
Fabulous work! And it's passed! That Ole Cheesy Dude ( Talk to the hand!) 06:07, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
Removed {{Good article}}. The article does not meet criterion for Good article status. The plot section has no references. Per good article criterion, good articles need to be "Factually accurate and verifiable: (a) it provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout;
An easy fail, a section that's entirely unreferenced. Northamerica1000 ( talk) 11:39, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 420 (Family Guy). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:24, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 420 (Family Guy). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:59, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
The article doesn't mention this bit; the crudely animated insert in which the man and his dog discuss weed (the conversation presented in written form rather than being spoken). Presumably this is a reference to something. If so, what? Martyn Smith ( talk) 08:14, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Done a bit of research and have added a relevant comment within the article Martyn Smith ( talk) 09:42, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 07:22, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Consensus to move to "420 (Family Guy)" ( non-admin closure) b uidh e 23:20, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Episode 420 (Family Guy) → Episode 420 – " Episode 420" already redirects straight here, it's pointless to have the page's title specificity the series. Grapesoda22 ( talk) 21:26, 31 May 2020 (UTC) Grapesoda22 ( talk) 21:26, 31 May 2020 (UTC)—Relisting. Mdaniels5757 ( talk) 20:03, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Episode 420. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 21#Episode 420 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. --
IJBall (
contribs •
talk)
20:57, 21 June 2020 (UTC)