This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
it says here it is the third behind one two and four in height. Wouldn't that make it fourth? is it fourth or is it only behind one and two?
The number of floores is 80 and not 71 !!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.75.114.154 ( talk • contribs) 18:22, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
An image used in this article,
File:3WTCupdated.png, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 09:19, 25 September 2011 (UTC) |
Per the WTC site [ [1]], only One World Trade Center is spelled out. 7 World Trade Center correctly uses the numeral, and I've boldly moved 2 World Trade Center to the numeral. Since this article has a more substantial history, I'm raising the issue here rather than making a bold move. Acroterion (talk) 01:00, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
I think it's best if we put the description about the old building in the page for the former WTC site. H-Man ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:49, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
I agree, the section on the old building should either be on the page for the former WTC, or, perhaps more usefully, on its own page. The original hotel and the new office building have almost no connection. They are of different design, different function, and are at completely different locations. The only connection they have is their name. jamesluckard 09:20, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
The height of Three World Trade Center should primarily be in Standard Measurements not Metric! This building is located in New York, not London! Please mark Metric in Brackets and Standard in no brackets! CookieMonster755 ( talk) 01:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC)CookieMonster755
@ David J Johnson: Why did you revert the IP's reversion of the "Destroyed" status for the Marriot WTC's infobox to "Under construction"? As I am to understand it, the new building may or may not be a hotel like the old one, but either way, the original is gone forever. As far as I am aware, no plans to restore any of the former elements of the old WTC as they once existed are underway. Or has something come up to suggest this? Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 06:39, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on 3 World Trade Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://nabe-web.com/am2001/stories.htmWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:31, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
The current image of 3 World Trade Center is stil the picture from a year later still being constructed. I i went to Wikimedia Commons and couldn’t find any pictures. And I don’t want to risk copying from searching the web. So can someone just get a new picture or tell me how to post a picture from the web. HorsesARENice Ride me to my talk page 14:34, 8 July 2018 (UTC) HorsesARENice Ride me to my talk page 14:34, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
@ David J Johnson, Emmmacron51, Seth Whales, and HorsesAreNice: Looking for thoughts regarding two image options for the infobox. User:Lawrence 979 prefers the former, which shows the building from immediately below it, while I prefer the latter, which shows the building in its entirety, unobstructed by trees and corrected for perspective. The latter format is in line with how skyscrapers are usually photographed. Filetime ( talk) 17:52, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
I can actually agree that the picture that shows the whole building has a better view, but i think the cropped nature of the picture doesn't fit with other articles (including 4WTC which i also reverted). I would recommend that a new photo with a similar type of view to 4 world trade center should be found somewhere on the internet and uploaded to wikipedia commons to be used. Leave it as the slightly obstructed one for the time being — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lawrence 979 ( talk • contribs) 19:06, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
I am alright with the one chosen. While I am personally not the biggest fan of cropped photos, I think the amount that is cropped in this particular one is better than the previous one inserted. The other seemed (to me at least) to be slightly squished, which I am happy got removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lawrence 979 ( talk • contribs) 10:45, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
it says here it is the third behind one two and four in height. Wouldn't that make it fourth? is it fourth or is it only behind one and two?
The number of floores is 80 and not 71 !!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.75.114.154 ( talk • contribs) 18:22, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
An image used in this article,
File:3WTCupdated.png, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 09:19, 25 September 2011 (UTC) |
Per the WTC site [ [1]], only One World Trade Center is spelled out. 7 World Trade Center correctly uses the numeral, and I've boldly moved 2 World Trade Center to the numeral. Since this article has a more substantial history, I'm raising the issue here rather than making a bold move. Acroterion (talk) 01:00, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
I think it's best if we put the description about the old building in the page for the former WTC site. H-Man ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:49, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
I agree, the section on the old building should either be on the page for the former WTC, or, perhaps more usefully, on its own page. The original hotel and the new office building have almost no connection. They are of different design, different function, and are at completely different locations. The only connection they have is their name. jamesluckard 09:20, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
The height of Three World Trade Center should primarily be in Standard Measurements not Metric! This building is located in New York, not London! Please mark Metric in Brackets and Standard in no brackets! CookieMonster755 ( talk) 01:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC)CookieMonster755
@ David J Johnson: Why did you revert the IP's reversion of the "Destroyed" status for the Marriot WTC's infobox to "Under construction"? As I am to understand it, the new building may or may not be a hotel like the old one, but either way, the original is gone forever. As far as I am aware, no plans to restore any of the former elements of the old WTC as they once existed are underway. Or has something come up to suggest this? Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 06:39, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on 3 World Trade Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://nabe-web.com/am2001/stories.htmWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:31, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
The current image of 3 World Trade Center is stil the picture from a year later still being constructed. I i went to Wikimedia Commons and couldn’t find any pictures. And I don’t want to risk copying from searching the web. So can someone just get a new picture or tell me how to post a picture from the web. HorsesARENice Ride me to my talk page 14:34, 8 July 2018 (UTC) HorsesARENice Ride me to my talk page 14:34, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
@ David J Johnson, Emmmacron51, Seth Whales, and HorsesAreNice: Looking for thoughts regarding two image options for the infobox. User:Lawrence 979 prefers the former, which shows the building from immediately below it, while I prefer the latter, which shows the building in its entirety, unobstructed by trees and corrected for perspective. The latter format is in line with how skyscrapers are usually photographed. Filetime ( talk) 17:52, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
I can actually agree that the picture that shows the whole building has a better view, but i think the cropped nature of the picture doesn't fit with other articles (including 4WTC which i also reverted). I would recommend that a new photo with a similar type of view to 4 world trade center should be found somewhere on the internet and uploaded to wikipedia commons to be used. Leave it as the slightly obstructed one for the time being — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lawrence 979 ( talk • contribs) 19:06, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
I am alright with the one chosen. While I am personally not the biggest fan of cropped photos, I think the amount that is cropped in this particular one is better than the previous one inserted. The other seemed (to me at least) to be slightly squished, which I am happy got removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lawrence 979 ( talk • contribs) 10:45, 9 July 2021 (UTC)