This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
20 cm/50 3rd Year Type naval gun article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The long list is inefficient. Describe each turret and say which turret is on which class and how many. Far easier to grasp. I'd also prefer to split these guns into two different articles to allow for complete stats for each gun.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 02:20, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
It seems to me the page should be moved to 20cm/50 caliber 3rd Year Type naval gun, which is the correct designation.... TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 20:34, 16 October 2011 (UTC) (P.S. I'm not watchlisting this...)
Under the specifications tab on the right, 835m/s (meters per second) does not equal 2540 feet per second. As I do not know what the real velocity is, nor do I have a source I can cite, all I can say is it is a math error.
If possible it should be corrected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enchalata ( talk • contribs) 04:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Why are the Mark I and Mark II guns referred to as "1 GÔ" and "2 GÔ," respectively? In Japanese they are called "1号" and "2号," so shouldn't it be transliterated as "1 Gō" and "2 Gō?" I'd change it myself, but there might be a specific reason for using a capital circumflex O instead of a lowercase macron O, and I would like to see if someone more knowledgeable knows.
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
20 cm/50 3rd Year Type naval gun article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The long list is inefficient. Describe each turret and say which turret is on which class and how many. Far easier to grasp. I'd also prefer to split these guns into two different articles to allow for complete stats for each gun.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 02:20, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
It seems to me the page should be moved to 20cm/50 caliber 3rd Year Type naval gun, which is the correct designation.... TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 20:34, 16 October 2011 (UTC) (P.S. I'm not watchlisting this...)
Under the specifications tab on the right, 835m/s (meters per second) does not equal 2540 feet per second. As I do not know what the real velocity is, nor do I have a source I can cite, all I can say is it is a math error.
If possible it should be corrected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enchalata ( talk • contribs) 04:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Why are the Mark I and Mark II guns referred to as "1 GÔ" and "2 GÔ," respectively? In Japanese they are called "1号" and "2号," so shouldn't it be transliterated as "1 Gō" and "2 Gō?" I'd change it myself, but there might be a specific reason for using a capital circumflex O instead of a lowercase macron O, and I would like to see if someone more knowledgeable knows.