This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
2015–16 Australian region cyclone season article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Other basin talkpages | 2015:
Atlantic -
W. Pacific -
Central and East Pacific -
N. Indian -
S. Hemisphere
2015-16: S. Hemisphere - SW. Indian - Australian - S. Pacific 2016: Atlantic - W. Pacific - Central and East. Pacific - N. Indian - S. Hemisphere |
![]() | This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Pre season, December, January, February, March, Post season // Tracking data |
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
ID | Date (ACST) | TC Name | TCWC | Original Basin | Lat (S) | Long (E) | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01U* | 2015-07-01 | Raquel* | B | Coral Sea | 5.8 | 159.3 | Tech Bull |
02U | 2015-11-17Â ? | ||||||
03U | - | ||||||
04U | 2015-12-23 | - | P | Indian Ocean | 10 | 108 | Tech Bull |
05U | 2015-12-23 | - | D | WA | 14 | 131 | Database |
06U | 2015-12-27 | - | P | Indian Ocean | 13 | 91 | Tech Bull |
07U | 2016-01-19 | - | P | Indian Ocean | 12 | 94 | Tech Bull |
08U | 2016-01-27 | Stan | P | Indian Ocean | 13 | 118 | Tech Bull |
09U | 2016-02-05 | Uriah | P | Indian Ocean | 9 | 97 | Tech Bull |
10U | 2016-02-10 | Tatiana | B | Solomon Islands | 16 | 157 | Tech Bull |
11U | 2016-02-14 | - | P | 12 | 107 | Tech Bull | |
12U | 2016-03-05 | - | P | Indian Ocean | 17 | 93 | Tech Bull |
13U | 2016-03-03 | Winston | B | Solomon Islands | |||
14U | 2016-03-14 | - | D | Darwin | 15 | 137 | Database |
15U | - |
@ Meow:, @ Jason Rees:, @ Cyclonebiskit:, @ Jasper Deng: This is weird and kind of awesome about this storm. As of today, Raquel had exited the AusR basin and re-entered the SPac basin. The question is, that since it exited this basin, which article do we put Raquel at? Do we put it in the 2014-15 SPac season or the 2015-16 SPac season? This is really hard to be serious. :| Typhoon2013 (talk) 07:52, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
The project standard says no. Jason Rees ( talk) 21:05, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
It seems like it should have it's own article due to it's rarity and the fact that it caused quite a bit of damage and fatalities in the Solomon Islands. - http://hurricanes.einnews.com/article__detail/274604749?lcode=6xbPiy_HSQGAkk3nnxPUuA%3D%3D I tried creating an article for the storm but apparently it keeps redirecting to the main 2015-16 Australian region cyclone season page. Undescribed ( talk) 03:18, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
@ Jason Rees: Since we don't have Stan yet and it has been relativity quiet with only 3 TLs, I have decided that we should keep the TL sections instead of putting them in the "Other systems" section. Raquel is part of the 2014-15 season now, right? Since if we only have 1 or 2 TCs this season and add TLs in the "Other systems" section, it will be weird because the article is really short. So if we keep the TLs in their sections, it will be longer like the other seasons. Or just copy the format of the 2010 PTS article. Typhoon2013 (talk) 23:52, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
@ Jason Rees: First of all, I am sorry that this is just based on my opinion and no sources. But I am going to find out if this does work. Since the 2012-13 season, we have problems each year for missing (designated) lows, as for example in last season where we had a huge jump from 07U to 13U (Lam). IMO, I think the BoM do designate TLs, however they only mention the numbers if the low has a high chance of forming into a TC. Last month, our latest designated low was 06U and last week, we had a TL without a designation and only had a medium chance of further development. Today, a TL formed and was designated as 08U because it had a high chance. Therefore, I decided that last week's TL was 07U as it was the only TL active from January 1 to January 25. I will therefore be updated to BoM for any TLs and add it to the article and see if it works (I hope so). What do you think? Typhoon2013 (talk) 07:31, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
@ Jason Rees: @ Keith Edkins: In this site, it says that the next numbered system in the AusR basin is 16U, however so far our recent storm here is 14U and as far as I know, none of the 3 TCWCs have stated anything about a TL, even a weak tropical low. Otherwise this TL is the one from today (Pre-16F) stating a "developing TL", even check TCWC Brisbane. Or Keith, if you can browse through the previous sources from 18 March through to 31 March. Thanks. Typhoon2013 (talk) 10:55, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
I would personally like to see a reliable and citeable source directly state that Stan's remnant low affected Queensland or New South Wales, until we readd it to the article. For what its worth South Australia is direclty backed up by Stan's Tropical cyclone report. Jason Rees ( talk) 22:57, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 13 external links on 2015–16 Australian region cyclone season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 03:26, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on 2015–16 Australian region cyclone season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:09, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
2015–16 Australian region cyclone season article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Other basin talkpages | 2015:
Atlantic -
W. Pacific -
Central and East Pacific -
N. Indian -
S. Hemisphere
2015-16: S. Hemisphere - SW. Indian - Australian - S. Pacific 2016: Atlantic - W. Pacific - Central and East. Pacific - N. Indian - S. Hemisphere |
![]() | This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Pre season, December, January, February, March, Post season // Tracking data |
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
ID | Date (ACST) | TC Name | TCWC | Original Basin | Lat (S) | Long (E) | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01U* | 2015-07-01 | Raquel* | B | Coral Sea | 5.8 | 159.3 | Tech Bull |
02U | 2015-11-17Â ? | ||||||
03U | - | ||||||
04U | 2015-12-23 | - | P | Indian Ocean | 10 | 108 | Tech Bull |
05U | 2015-12-23 | - | D | WA | 14 | 131 | Database |
06U | 2015-12-27 | - | P | Indian Ocean | 13 | 91 | Tech Bull |
07U | 2016-01-19 | - | P | Indian Ocean | 12 | 94 | Tech Bull |
08U | 2016-01-27 | Stan | P | Indian Ocean | 13 | 118 | Tech Bull |
09U | 2016-02-05 | Uriah | P | Indian Ocean | 9 | 97 | Tech Bull |
10U | 2016-02-10 | Tatiana | B | Solomon Islands | 16 | 157 | Tech Bull |
11U | 2016-02-14 | - | P | 12 | 107 | Tech Bull | |
12U | 2016-03-05 | - | P | Indian Ocean | 17 | 93 | Tech Bull |
13U | 2016-03-03 | Winston | B | Solomon Islands | |||
14U | 2016-03-14 | - | D | Darwin | 15 | 137 | Database |
15U | - |
@ Meow:, @ Jason Rees:, @ Cyclonebiskit:, @ Jasper Deng: This is weird and kind of awesome about this storm. As of today, Raquel had exited the AusR basin and re-entered the SPac basin. The question is, that since it exited this basin, which article do we put Raquel at? Do we put it in the 2014-15 SPac season or the 2015-16 SPac season? This is really hard to be serious. :| Typhoon2013 (talk) 07:52, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
The project standard says no. Jason Rees ( talk) 21:05, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
It seems like it should have it's own article due to it's rarity and the fact that it caused quite a bit of damage and fatalities in the Solomon Islands. - http://hurricanes.einnews.com/article__detail/274604749?lcode=6xbPiy_HSQGAkk3nnxPUuA%3D%3D I tried creating an article for the storm but apparently it keeps redirecting to the main 2015-16 Australian region cyclone season page. Undescribed ( talk) 03:18, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
@ Jason Rees: Since we don't have Stan yet and it has been relativity quiet with only 3 TLs, I have decided that we should keep the TL sections instead of putting them in the "Other systems" section. Raquel is part of the 2014-15 season now, right? Since if we only have 1 or 2 TCs this season and add TLs in the "Other systems" section, it will be weird because the article is really short. So if we keep the TLs in their sections, it will be longer like the other seasons. Or just copy the format of the 2010 PTS article. Typhoon2013 (talk) 23:52, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
@ Jason Rees: First of all, I am sorry that this is just based on my opinion and no sources. But I am going to find out if this does work. Since the 2012-13 season, we have problems each year for missing (designated) lows, as for example in last season where we had a huge jump from 07U to 13U (Lam). IMO, I think the BoM do designate TLs, however they only mention the numbers if the low has a high chance of forming into a TC. Last month, our latest designated low was 06U and last week, we had a TL without a designation and only had a medium chance of further development. Today, a TL formed and was designated as 08U because it had a high chance. Therefore, I decided that last week's TL was 07U as it was the only TL active from January 1 to January 25. I will therefore be updated to BoM for any TLs and add it to the article and see if it works (I hope so). What do you think? Typhoon2013 (talk) 07:31, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
@ Jason Rees: @ Keith Edkins: In this site, it says that the next numbered system in the AusR basin is 16U, however so far our recent storm here is 14U and as far as I know, none of the 3 TCWCs have stated anything about a TL, even a weak tropical low. Otherwise this TL is the one from today (Pre-16F) stating a "developing TL", even check TCWC Brisbane. Or Keith, if you can browse through the previous sources from 18 March through to 31 March. Thanks. Typhoon2013 (talk) 10:55, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
I would personally like to see a reliable and citeable source directly state that Stan's remnant low affected Queensland or New South Wales, until we readd it to the article. For what its worth South Australia is direclty backed up by Stan's Tropical cyclone report. Jason Rees ( talk) 22:57, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 13 external links on 2015–16 Australian region cyclone season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 03:26, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on 2015–16 Australian region cyclone season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:09, 21 June 2017 (UTC)