This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
On 14 April 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from 2014 NHL Entry Draft to 2014 NHL entry draft. The result of the discussion was moved. |
When adding trades that involve Phoenix for the rest of the 2013–14 NHL season; please refer to them as the Arizona Coyotes as the name change will take effect for the 2014–15 NHL season. If the Coyotes trade away any more of their draft picks please refer to the Coyotes' fourth-round pick that has already been traded for formatting. Deadman137 ( talk) 19:08, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Could it safely be assumed that the condition from the first trade of this pick (to SJS, together with Tommy Grant for Brandon Mashinter) has not been met? If so, we should remove the line either by commenting it out (for later reference once the league releases the exact draft order) or by deleting it altogether... Unfortunately, research regarding the condition was unsuccessful, otherwise the riddle would have already been solved. -- Soccer-holic I hear voices in my head... 11:23, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
As we all know the New Jersey Devils must forfeit their first-round pick this year's draft. This may result in some editors trying to remove the Devils pick from the 1st round table when it gets made later this year. I am proposing that we use the same numbering criteria that was used in the 2011 draft when the Devils had to give up their 3rd round pick that year, any objections?
Also as quick side note; this draft will not have any compensatory 2nd round picks as all of the 2009 first-round picks were signed by an NHL team. So there should be 210 picks for the 2014 draft. Deadman137 ( talk) 07:29, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
If both conditions for the involved first-round pick in 2014 kick in, the Sabres will receive said pick from the Blues in exchange for Minnesota's second and their own third; if one condition fails to be converted, Buffalo gets a third in 2016 instead, right?
Sorry for the reassurance question, but there are really too many conditions attached to this trade... XD -- Soccer-holic I hear voices in my head... 07:41, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Does anyone know the draft order of playoff teams was changed due to the relaligment: It was (in reverse order): SC winner, SC runnerup, 2 conference final losers, ANY REMAINING DIVISION CHAMPS, remaining playoff teams. Considering there's only 4 divisions versus the previous 6, did they change it up? TerminalPreppie ( talk) 14:58, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Its actually pretty simple. The draft order of the playoff teams is...
DAL,DET,CBJ,PHI,NYR,MIN,LAK,MTL,TBL,CHI,SJS,STL,PIT,COL,ANA,BOS
The only thing to determine is who wins the Cup and moves to the back of the line. TerminalPreppie ( talk) 20:32, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
The order of selection among the Member Clubs in each season shall be determined in the following manner:
A composite of all Member Clubs shall be prepared by placing:
i) First the Clubs which failed to qualify for the preceding playoffs in the order of points earned by each of them in the regular schedule of the preceding season starting with the Club having the lowest points total and followed by the Club having the next lowest points total, and so forth.
ii) The Clubs which participated in the preceding playoffs (but had not been ranked first in their respective Divisions and had not won the Stanley Cup that season) in order of points earned by each of them in the regular schedule of the preceding season starting with the Club having the lowest total points and followed by the Club having the next lowest total points, and so forth.
iii) The Clubs which had been ranked first in their Divisions during the next preceding season (but had not won the Stanley Cup that season) in the order of points earned by each of them in the regular schedule of the preceding season starting with the Club having the lowest total points and followed by the Club having the next lowest total points, and so forth.
iv) The Stanley Cup winner shall select last, thus, positioning all Clubs on the list.
Basically, this means:
i) All non-playoff teams pick before the playoff teams. Lower amount of points = a higher pick.
ii) All playoff teams (excluding division winners) receive the next picks. Again, lower amount of points = a higher pick.
iii) All division winners receive the next picks. As before, lower amounts of points = a higher pick.
iv) Stanley Cup winner receives the last pick.
The league is the organization holding the draft, not TSN. Thus, we go by the order the league sets. Canuck89
(talk to me) 10:20, May 15, 2014 (UTC)
References
The Kings owe the Blue Jackets two 2nd round picks (one in 2014 and Toronto's in 2015), I just made the decision to make the 2014 pick transfer for the playoff condition and transfer the 2015 pick using the King's option. I'll change it if anyone has any objections or can come up with any better evidence. Deadman137 ( talk) 16:25, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
http://www.nhl.com/ice/blogpost.htm?id=26853 Can some one clarify this. As I see it: A) Meszaros signs before draft: PHI gets the 2nd B)Meszaros walks/retires: PHI gets the 3rd C) Meszaros resigns over the summer : PHI gets the 3rd and also 2015's 4th. Right? TerminalPreppie ( talk) 13:40, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Looks like pick 151 (Buffalo's 6th round pick) did in fact go to the Oilers in the Omark trade. The initial condition was Omark playing 15 games, but there must have been another condition that was not reported that gave the Oilers the pick. Deadman137 ( talk) 01:23, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
I don't think this is correct. According to NHL.com, Buffalo is selecting 1st in the 6th round. [1]. Llopster ( talk) 12:16, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
References
Was just looking over at the NBA draft page, as that was underway tonight. Was curious if people were interested in making changes similar to what they have there? For example,
# | Player | Nationality | NHL Team | College/Junior/Club Team |
---|---|---|---|---|
61 | Buffalo Sabres | |||
62 | Chicago Blackhawks (from Florida) 1 | |||
63 | Columbus Blue Jackets (from Edmonton via Los Angeles) 2 | |||
64 | Calgary Flames | |||
65 | New York Islanders | |||
66 | Vancouver Canucks | |||
67 | Carolina Hurricanes | |||
68 | Toronto Maple Leafs | |||
69 | Winnipeg Jets | |||
70 | Ottawa Senators | |||
71 | New Jersey Devils | |||
72 | Nashville Predators | |||
73 | Arizona Coyotes | |||
74 | Washington Capitals | |||
75 | Dallas Stars | |||
76 | Detroit Red Wings | |||
77 | Columbus Blue Jackets | |||
78 | New York Islanders (from Philadelphia) 3 | |||
79 | Minnesota Wild | |||
80 | Tampa Bay Lightning | |||
81 | San Jose Sharks | |||
82 | St. Louis Blues | |||
83 | Calgary Flames (from Pittsburgh) 4 | |||
84 | Colorado Avalanche | |||
85 | Anaheim Ducks | |||
86 | Boston Bruins | |||
87 | Montreal Canadiens | |||
88 | Chicago Blackhawks | |||
89 | New York Rangers | |||
90 | Los Angeles Kings |
Pick | Original team | Draft team | Transactions |
---|---|---|---|
1 ^ | Florida Panthers | Chicago Blackhawks |
Florida to Chicago (March 2, 2014)
[1]
|
2 ^ | Edmonton Oilers | Columbus Blue Jackets |
Edmonton to
Los Angeles (January 15, 2014)
[2]
Los Angeles to Columbus (March 5, 2014)
[3]
|
3 ^ | Philadelphia Flyers | New York Islanders |
Philadelphia to New York Islanders (March 4, 2014)
[4]
|
4 ^ | Pittsburgh Penguins | Calgary Flames |
Pittsburgh to Calgary (March 5, 2014)
[5]
|
- Uncleben85 ( talk) 04:41, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
References
I'm posting the flowing proposal on behalf of Mb34:
"I want to propose adding a "draftees based on league" table. I imagine readers would be equally interested in an aggregation of which leagues future NHL players are coming from as much as which countries they are coming from. A table of the top 5 leagues would probably suffice. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mb34 (talk • contribs) 17:54, 30 June 2014 (UTC)"
Does anyone have any comments? Deadman137 ( talk) 15:31, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
I don't think it could hurt anything. Baseball420 ( talk) 18:21, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
2014 NHL Entry Draft. Please take a moment to review
my edit. You may add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 17:42, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:NHL Entry Draft which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 01:05, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
On 14 April 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from 2014 NHL Entry Draft to 2014 NHL entry draft. The result of the discussion was moved. |
When adding trades that involve Phoenix for the rest of the 2013–14 NHL season; please refer to them as the Arizona Coyotes as the name change will take effect for the 2014–15 NHL season. If the Coyotes trade away any more of their draft picks please refer to the Coyotes' fourth-round pick that has already been traded for formatting. Deadman137 ( talk) 19:08, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Could it safely be assumed that the condition from the first trade of this pick (to SJS, together with Tommy Grant for Brandon Mashinter) has not been met? If so, we should remove the line either by commenting it out (for later reference once the league releases the exact draft order) or by deleting it altogether... Unfortunately, research regarding the condition was unsuccessful, otherwise the riddle would have already been solved. -- Soccer-holic I hear voices in my head... 11:23, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
As we all know the New Jersey Devils must forfeit their first-round pick this year's draft. This may result in some editors trying to remove the Devils pick from the 1st round table when it gets made later this year. I am proposing that we use the same numbering criteria that was used in the 2011 draft when the Devils had to give up their 3rd round pick that year, any objections?
Also as quick side note; this draft will not have any compensatory 2nd round picks as all of the 2009 first-round picks were signed by an NHL team. So there should be 210 picks for the 2014 draft. Deadman137 ( talk) 07:29, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
If both conditions for the involved first-round pick in 2014 kick in, the Sabres will receive said pick from the Blues in exchange for Minnesota's second and their own third; if one condition fails to be converted, Buffalo gets a third in 2016 instead, right?
Sorry for the reassurance question, but there are really too many conditions attached to this trade... XD -- Soccer-holic I hear voices in my head... 07:41, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Does anyone know the draft order of playoff teams was changed due to the relaligment: It was (in reverse order): SC winner, SC runnerup, 2 conference final losers, ANY REMAINING DIVISION CHAMPS, remaining playoff teams. Considering there's only 4 divisions versus the previous 6, did they change it up? TerminalPreppie ( talk) 14:58, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Its actually pretty simple. The draft order of the playoff teams is...
DAL,DET,CBJ,PHI,NYR,MIN,LAK,MTL,TBL,CHI,SJS,STL,PIT,COL,ANA,BOS
The only thing to determine is who wins the Cup and moves to the back of the line. TerminalPreppie ( talk) 20:32, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
The order of selection among the Member Clubs in each season shall be determined in the following manner:
A composite of all Member Clubs shall be prepared by placing:
i) First the Clubs which failed to qualify for the preceding playoffs in the order of points earned by each of them in the regular schedule of the preceding season starting with the Club having the lowest points total and followed by the Club having the next lowest points total, and so forth.
ii) The Clubs which participated in the preceding playoffs (but had not been ranked first in their respective Divisions and had not won the Stanley Cup that season) in order of points earned by each of them in the regular schedule of the preceding season starting with the Club having the lowest total points and followed by the Club having the next lowest total points, and so forth.
iii) The Clubs which had been ranked first in their Divisions during the next preceding season (but had not won the Stanley Cup that season) in the order of points earned by each of them in the regular schedule of the preceding season starting with the Club having the lowest total points and followed by the Club having the next lowest total points, and so forth.
iv) The Stanley Cup winner shall select last, thus, positioning all Clubs on the list.
Basically, this means:
i) All non-playoff teams pick before the playoff teams. Lower amount of points = a higher pick.
ii) All playoff teams (excluding division winners) receive the next picks. Again, lower amount of points = a higher pick.
iii) All division winners receive the next picks. As before, lower amounts of points = a higher pick.
iv) Stanley Cup winner receives the last pick.
The league is the organization holding the draft, not TSN. Thus, we go by the order the league sets. Canuck89
(talk to me) 10:20, May 15, 2014 (UTC)
References
The Kings owe the Blue Jackets two 2nd round picks (one in 2014 and Toronto's in 2015), I just made the decision to make the 2014 pick transfer for the playoff condition and transfer the 2015 pick using the King's option. I'll change it if anyone has any objections or can come up with any better evidence. Deadman137 ( talk) 16:25, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
http://www.nhl.com/ice/blogpost.htm?id=26853 Can some one clarify this. As I see it: A) Meszaros signs before draft: PHI gets the 2nd B)Meszaros walks/retires: PHI gets the 3rd C) Meszaros resigns over the summer : PHI gets the 3rd and also 2015's 4th. Right? TerminalPreppie ( talk) 13:40, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Looks like pick 151 (Buffalo's 6th round pick) did in fact go to the Oilers in the Omark trade. The initial condition was Omark playing 15 games, but there must have been another condition that was not reported that gave the Oilers the pick. Deadman137 ( talk) 01:23, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
I don't think this is correct. According to NHL.com, Buffalo is selecting 1st in the 6th round. [1]. Llopster ( talk) 12:16, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
References
Was just looking over at the NBA draft page, as that was underway tonight. Was curious if people were interested in making changes similar to what they have there? For example,
# | Player | Nationality | NHL Team | College/Junior/Club Team |
---|---|---|---|---|
61 | Buffalo Sabres | |||
62 | Chicago Blackhawks (from Florida) 1 | |||
63 | Columbus Blue Jackets (from Edmonton via Los Angeles) 2 | |||
64 | Calgary Flames | |||
65 | New York Islanders | |||
66 | Vancouver Canucks | |||
67 | Carolina Hurricanes | |||
68 | Toronto Maple Leafs | |||
69 | Winnipeg Jets | |||
70 | Ottawa Senators | |||
71 | New Jersey Devils | |||
72 | Nashville Predators | |||
73 | Arizona Coyotes | |||
74 | Washington Capitals | |||
75 | Dallas Stars | |||
76 | Detroit Red Wings | |||
77 | Columbus Blue Jackets | |||
78 | New York Islanders (from Philadelphia) 3 | |||
79 | Minnesota Wild | |||
80 | Tampa Bay Lightning | |||
81 | San Jose Sharks | |||
82 | St. Louis Blues | |||
83 | Calgary Flames (from Pittsburgh) 4 | |||
84 | Colorado Avalanche | |||
85 | Anaheim Ducks | |||
86 | Boston Bruins | |||
87 | Montreal Canadiens | |||
88 | Chicago Blackhawks | |||
89 | New York Rangers | |||
90 | Los Angeles Kings |
Pick | Original team | Draft team | Transactions |
---|---|---|---|
1 ^ | Florida Panthers | Chicago Blackhawks |
Florida to Chicago (March 2, 2014)
[1]
|
2 ^ | Edmonton Oilers | Columbus Blue Jackets |
Edmonton to
Los Angeles (January 15, 2014)
[2]
Los Angeles to Columbus (March 5, 2014)
[3]
|
3 ^ | Philadelphia Flyers | New York Islanders |
Philadelphia to New York Islanders (March 4, 2014)
[4]
|
4 ^ | Pittsburgh Penguins | Calgary Flames |
Pittsburgh to Calgary (March 5, 2014)
[5]
|
- Uncleben85 ( talk) 04:41, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
References
I'm posting the flowing proposal on behalf of Mb34:
"I want to propose adding a "draftees based on league" table. I imagine readers would be equally interested in an aggregation of which leagues future NHL players are coming from as much as which countries they are coming from. A table of the top 5 leagues would probably suffice. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mb34 (talk • contribs) 17:54, 30 June 2014 (UTC)"
Does anyone have any comments? Deadman137 ( talk) 15:31, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
I don't think it could hurt anything. Baseball420 ( talk) 18:21, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
2014 NHL Entry Draft. Please take a moment to review
my edit. You may add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 17:42, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:NHL Entry Draft which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 01:05, 14 April 2024 (UTC)