![]() | 2011 Cricket World Cup was a Sports and recreation good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
The venues have no need to be highlighted with photos and fancy tables. The venue table is concise and complete in its current form. ashwinikalantri talk 18:00, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
You can check even other articles. The most followed format has an added advantage that it gives a graphical look for the stadiums which makes the article more appealing. Hence, I think we should continue with this format without thinking about our personal egos.-- Karyasuman ( talk) 05:47, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
I think the table with pictures is far superior to without. Firstly, the pictures help to identify the subjects, both the sport and stadium, and graphically give information as to their size that a table of capacity simply can't. Secondly, vast precedence has been to include venue pictures on world cup articles. Though there is no standard format, due to precedence, the burden of proof is on those wishing to change. Thirdly, your opinion that the non-graphical table is cleaner, is just that, your opinion. I think that the graphical one is cleaner. And both are concise, even though the graphical one gives more information. Fourthly, there is no guideline that says we have to be concise, in fact, there is considerable disagreement to that point, in that we should provide as much info that is relevant, verifiable and useful. Of which pictures definitely meet all three. Finally, the use of images is highly encouraged where appropriate, and, again, this is one of those places. Ravendrop 22:15, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Bangabandhu national stadium.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 18 August 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 07:47, 18 August 2011 (UTC) |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Bill william compton ( talk · contribs) 15:53, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Just wondering, why are some of the references dated as being accessed BEFORE the 2011 Cricket World Cup actually took place? I find that quite interesting. L1ght5h0w ( talk) 22:52, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
This is the single most important fact about the competition. It should be in the first sentence. Hesperian 09:05, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 2011 ICC Cricket World Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:55, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Cricket World Cup which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 22:20, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Indian map is wrong 106.79.202.224 ( talk) 01:32, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
![]() | 2011 Cricket World Cup was a Sports and recreation good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
|
|
The venues have no need to be highlighted with photos and fancy tables. The venue table is concise and complete in its current form. ashwinikalantri talk 18:00, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
You can check even other articles. The most followed format has an added advantage that it gives a graphical look for the stadiums which makes the article more appealing. Hence, I think we should continue with this format without thinking about our personal egos.-- Karyasuman ( talk) 05:47, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
I think the table with pictures is far superior to without. Firstly, the pictures help to identify the subjects, both the sport and stadium, and graphically give information as to their size that a table of capacity simply can't. Secondly, vast precedence has been to include venue pictures on world cup articles. Though there is no standard format, due to precedence, the burden of proof is on those wishing to change. Thirdly, your opinion that the non-graphical table is cleaner, is just that, your opinion. I think that the graphical one is cleaner. And both are concise, even though the graphical one gives more information. Fourthly, there is no guideline that says we have to be concise, in fact, there is considerable disagreement to that point, in that we should provide as much info that is relevant, verifiable and useful. Of which pictures definitely meet all three. Finally, the use of images is highly encouraged where appropriate, and, again, this is one of those places. Ravendrop 22:15, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Bangabandhu national stadium.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 18 August 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 07:47, 18 August 2011 (UTC) |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Bill william compton ( talk · contribs) 15:53, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Just wondering, why are some of the references dated as being accessed BEFORE the 2011 Cricket World Cup actually took place? I find that quite interesting. L1ght5h0w ( talk) 22:52, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
This is the single most important fact about the competition. It should be in the first sentence. Hesperian 09:05, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 2011 ICC Cricket World Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:55, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Cricket World Cup which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 22:20, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Indian map is wrong 106.79.202.224 ( talk) 01:32, 30 October 2022 (UTC)