This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Environment Low‑importance This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Climate change Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide International relations: United Nations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject United Nations. Ecology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Poland Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2014 Q1. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Hood College/PSCI 305: American Foreign Policy (Spring 2014)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.

I plan on editing this page soon to include more detailed information and citations for existing information. Gntroutman ( talk) 03:56, 31 March 2014 (UTC) reply

I also plan on adding for information to this page soon. I plan to research what the conference accomplished and what was implemented following its conclusion. Mrd12

Interesting article. I found another stub on Wikipedia that you could link "Subsidiary Body for Scientific & Technological Advice" if you would like to add it. /info/en/?search=Subsidiary_Body_of_Scientific_and_Technological_Advice Also, just a question about the two categories outlined by the Kyoto project. Was there any mention in your reading of a category named "Annex 2" or would "non-annex 1" be the same thing? Tseay ( talk) 17:26, 27 April 2014 (UTC) reply

I liked how in this article previous climate change actions, and the issues concerning them were addressed. This article looks very well researched. However, It would be interesting to know a little more about those who attended as well as the parts they played in the conference Brkachursky ( talk) 19:49, 28 April 2014 (UTC) reply

I thought this was a good article with a lot of information and good sources. My only suggestion would be to adding a little more info on the outcome section. Drewhartman15 ( talk) 19:56, 28 April 2014 (UTC) reply