![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 15:24, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 15:24, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
http://documents.epfl.ch/users/a/al/allenbac/www/documents/Fich0203.pdf Fan Railer ( talk) 01:47, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
The WP article is obnoxiously silent on the origins of the 0-series tech. Allegedly, the 0-series was designed by Siemens, continuing the WW2 tradition of german -> japanese technology transfer. 91.82.35.73 ( talk) 22:30, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
User DAJF removed the image with a close up view of the very head of a Shinkansen trainset which I happened to shoot during my visit to Japan in 1982. After his revert, there are again 7 more or less identical views of a Shinkansen trainset trying to show the whole length from a front side angle.
I think that if there exists an image showing the head section of the train in close up, this image should be in this article. So I argue for reverting DAJF's revert so that one image is there which shows a different view than those remaing 6 identical views.
Cheers, L.Willms ( talk) 10:13, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Re 0 Series Shinkansen#History ..."were standard gauge ({{RailGauge|1435mm|disp=sqbr}} 1,435 mm sqbr 4 ft 8+1⁄2 in between the rails) → are 1,435 mm (4 ft 8+1⁄2 in) standard gauge between the rails)" This is an instance where the incorporation of "disp=sqbr" into the template(s) would have been useful. Peter Horn User talk 16:57, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 15:24, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 15:24, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
http://documents.epfl.ch/users/a/al/allenbac/www/documents/Fich0203.pdf Fan Railer ( talk) 01:47, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
The WP article is obnoxiously silent on the origins of the 0-series tech. Allegedly, the 0-series was designed by Siemens, continuing the WW2 tradition of german -> japanese technology transfer. 91.82.35.73 ( talk) 22:30, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
User DAJF removed the image with a close up view of the very head of a Shinkansen trainset which I happened to shoot during my visit to Japan in 1982. After his revert, there are again 7 more or less identical views of a Shinkansen trainset trying to show the whole length from a front side angle.
I think that if there exists an image showing the head section of the train in close up, this image should be in this article. So I argue for reverting DAJF's revert so that one image is there which shows a different view than those remaing 6 identical views.
Cheers, L.Willms ( talk) 10:13, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Re 0 Series Shinkansen#History ..."were standard gauge ({{RailGauge|1435mm|disp=sqbr}} 1,435 mm sqbr 4 ft 8+1⁄2 in between the rails) → are 1,435 mm (4 ft 8+1⁄2 in) standard gauge between the rails)" This is an instance where the incorporation of "disp=sqbr" into the template(s) would have been useful. Peter Horn User talk 16:57, 1 May 2020 (UTC)