A user with 1,776 edits. Account created on 18 May 2016.
29 April 2024
- 09:12 09:12, 29 April 2024 diff hist −332 Us (2019 film) Undid revision 1221248862 by 2600:1008:A130:5F4A:7BFD:4D0C:C45:ED3D ( talk) current Tag: Undo
9 March 2024
- 17:48 17:48, 9 March 2024 diff hist −32 Alien: Covenant Restored revision 1212644320 by 2003 LN6 ( talk): Vandalism Tags: Twinkle Undo
7 March 2024
- 16:59 16:59, 7 March 2024 diff hist +1,329 User talk:SMcCandlish →WP:CONVENUE: Reply Tag: Reply
5 March 2024
- 13:40 13:40, 5 March 2024 diff hist +2,850 User talk:SMcCandlish →WP:CONVENUE: belated reply Tag: Reply
22 February 2024
- 07:52 07:52, 22 February 2024 diff hist +16 Rogue One Please stop edit warring, discuss on the talk page. You did not add any new information in your last edit or edit summary hence no response. The fact that the title sequence is years before the rest of the film is irrelevant. There is no real benefit in defining Rogue 1 in relation to the prequel trilogy, only the original one with which there are strong narrative connections. Tag: Undo
21 February 2024
- 17:52 17:52, 21 February 2024 diff hist +16 Rogue One I agree that interquel is not needed, as is the reference to the prequel trilogy Tag: Undo
20 February 2024
- 20:53 20:53, 20 February 2024 diff hist +557 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard →RFC participant comments: apparently needs explaining
- 17:24 17:24, 20 February 2024 diff hist +572 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard →RFC Non-participant comments: endorse and shameless plug
- 17:11 17:11, 20 February 2024 diff hist −135 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus →Defining some terms current
- 17:08 17:08, 20 February 2024 diff hist +42 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus →Why is the concept of levels of consensus important?
- 17:06 17:06, 20 February 2024 diff hist −20 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus Undid revision 1209169055 by Scribolt ( talk) Tag: Undo
- 17:05 17:05, 20 February 2024 diff hist +20 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus No edit summary Tag: Reverted
- 15:15 15:15, 20 February 2024 diff hist −4 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus →Defining some terms
- 15:14 15:14, 20 February 2024 diff hist 0 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus No edit summary
- 15:07 15:07, 20 February 2024 diff hist −24 Embassytown →Plot: general copy editing. Also, it doesn't really help the reader to keep switching between Ariekei and Hosts, apparently at random. current
- 13:13 13:13, 20 February 2024 diff hist −52 Embassytown →Plot: copy edit
- 13:09 13:09, 20 February 2024 diff hist +296 Embassytown →Plot: There is a planet worth of Arieki, no indication that they were all exposed. Add a little to the second half of the story; the breakaway of and later reconciliation with the Absurd via the new language / mind are important themes
- 12:55 12:55, 20 February 2024 diff hist −2 Embassytown →Plot: apologies, missed the additional context in the style section for exot
- 12:53 12:53, 20 February 2024 diff hist −197 Embassytown →Plot: lose edge of universe repetition and reference to immer travel being linked to physical distance, the novel explicity says this is not the case. Exots is not an explained term and isn't an important concept. The one mind is an essential part of Language. Not all similies are bizarre.
15 February 2024
- 08:15 08:15, 15 February 2024 diff hist −29 Alien: Covenant →Plot: remove praetomorph as not credited nor described as such in film, and no comments on talk page as of yet as to whether this is sourced. Also, clarified that only one alien had come out of Lopes' chest
14 February 2024
- 17:27 17:27, 14 February 2024 diff hist +4 m Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard →it is OR to use census data to produce a map?: ce
- 17:26 17:26, 14 February 2024 diff hist +267 Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard →it is OR to use census data to produce a map?
12 February 2024
- 11:57 11:57, 12 February 2024 diff hist +3 m Talk:Alien: Covenant →Proto/Praeto/Xenomorphs: ugh
- 11:57 11:57, 12 February 2024 diff hist +2 m Talk:Alien: Covenant →Proto/Praeto/Xenomorphs: ce
- 10:22 10:22, 12 February 2024 diff hist −85 Alien: Covenant →Plot: unnecessary detail
- 10:17 10:17, 12 February 2024 diff hist +124 Talk:Alien: Covenant →Proto/Praeto/Xenomorphs: add that I did have a look
- 10:14 10:14, 12 February 2024 diff hist +375 Talk:Alien: Covenant →Proto/Praeto/Xenomorphs: new section Tag: New topic
9 January 2024
- 08:21 08:21, 9 January 2024 diff hist +903 Wikipedia:Requests for comment/When there is no consensus either way →We have enough information. In principle, when there is truly no consensus, I believe we should err on the side of...: opine
24 December 2023
- 11:28 11:28, 24 December 2023 diff hist +369 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film →Fresh eyes requested at Blade Runner: new section Tag: New topic
- 09:21 09:21, 24 December 2023 diff hist +551 Talk:Blade Runner →Tech noir: reply
23 December 2023
- 22:17 22:17, 23 December 2023 diff hist −41 Blade Runner As per talk
- 22:13 22:13, 23 December 2023 diff hist +2,445 Talk:Blade Runner →Tech noir
9 November 2023
- 16:58 16:58, 9 November 2023 diff hist +3,008 Talk:Blade Runner →Tech noir: reply
8 November 2023
- 16:36 16:36, 8 November 2023 diff hist +1 Blade Runner Null edit. To clarify c the genre is exists and is notable, but not high quality sources are not often using it often enough when discussing BR imo to justify much info in this article (and certainly not the lead)
- 16:23 16:23, 8 November 2023 diff hist +6 Blade Runner a) I thought it lacked merit (i.e. DUE) not pertinence. b) it's still a crap source for a claim that it founded/inspired a film genre c) I never said that it wasn't notable, but the fact that next to no "real" sources talk about this & we have a zillion pointless categories are clues that this isn't a very established genre. Re-write to soften the claim (source says it's "one of the first tech noir films" & I found other equally bad sources that mentioned Metropolis & Alphaville
- 11:01 11:01, 8 November 2023 diff hist +876 User talk:WhatamIdoing →Some ramblings you might be interested in: late reply
- 08:16 08:16, 8 November 2023 diff hist −4 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus →So what does this mean?: ce
- 08:15 08:15, 8 November 2023 diff hist +26 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus →Defining some terms: also per WAID
- 08:12 08:12, 8 November 2023 diff hist +195 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus per WAID
- 07:48 07:48, 8 November 2023 diff hist −228 Blade Runner Disagree that this is appropriate for the lead. There's a lot of good sourcing available for this film, and a reference in a video game site with nothing in the article itself does not support the claim that is "often regarded as a foundational work of tech-noir", or that the film is a particularly notable element for this. If you think that this is something that should be developed then add it to the body (I don't think it even merits even that, we don't even have a category for the genre)
31 October 2023
- 10:12 10:12, 31 October 2023 diff hist +16 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus →Defining some terms
- 09:04 09:04, 31 October 2023 diff hist +516 User talk:WhatamIdoing →Some ramblings you might be interested in: new section Tag: New topic
- 09:04 09:04, 31 October 2023 diff hist −3 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus →Why is the concept of levels of consensus important?
- 08:56 08:56, 31 October 2023 diff hist −13 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus →Why is the concept of levels of consensus important?
- 08:52 08:52, 31 October 2023 diff hist +15 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus No edit summary
- 08:45 08:45, 31 October 2023 diff hist −1 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus →Some common, but not universally accepted, assumptions and related caveats
- 08:43 08:43, 31 October 2023 diff hist −223 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus →Some common, but not universally accepted, assumptions and related caveats
- 08:33 08:33, 31 October 2023 diff hist −5 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus →Some common, but not universally accepted, assumptions and related caveats
- 08:30 08:30, 31 October 2023 diff hist +20 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus →Why is the concept of levels of consensus important?
- 08:29 08:29, 31 October 2023 diff hist +18 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus →Why is the concept of levels of consensus important?
A user with 1,776 edits. Account created on 18 May 2016.
29 April 2024
- 09:12 09:12, 29 April 2024 diff hist −332 Us (2019 film) Undid revision 1221248862 by 2600:1008:A130:5F4A:7BFD:4D0C:C45:ED3D ( talk) current Tag: Undo
9 March 2024
- 17:48 17:48, 9 March 2024 diff hist −32 Alien: Covenant Restored revision 1212644320 by 2003 LN6 ( talk): Vandalism Tags: Twinkle Undo
7 March 2024
- 16:59 16:59, 7 March 2024 diff hist +1,329 User talk:SMcCandlish →WP:CONVENUE: Reply Tag: Reply
5 March 2024
- 13:40 13:40, 5 March 2024 diff hist +2,850 User talk:SMcCandlish →WP:CONVENUE: belated reply Tag: Reply
22 February 2024
- 07:52 07:52, 22 February 2024 diff hist +16 Rogue One Please stop edit warring, discuss on the talk page. You did not add any new information in your last edit or edit summary hence no response. The fact that the title sequence is years before the rest of the film is irrelevant. There is no real benefit in defining Rogue 1 in relation to the prequel trilogy, only the original one with which there are strong narrative connections. Tag: Undo
21 February 2024
- 17:52 17:52, 21 February 2024 diff hist +16 Rogue One I agree that interquel is not needed, as is the reference to the prequel trilogy Tag: Undo
20 February 2024
- 20:53 20:53, 20 February 2024 diff hist +557 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard →RFC participant comments: apparently needs explaining
- 17:24 17:24, 20 February 2024 diff hist +572 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard →RFC Non-participant comments: endorse and shameless plug
- 17:11 17:11, 20 February 2024 diff hist −135 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus →Defining some terms current
- 17:08 17:08, 20 February 2024 diff hist +42 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus →Why is the concept of levels of consensus important?
- 17:06 17:06, 20 February 2024 diff hist −20 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus Undid revision 1209169055 by Scribolt ( talk) Tag: Undo
- 17:05 17:05, 20 February 2024 diff hist +20 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus No edit summary Tag: Reverted
- 15:15 15:15, 20 February 2024 diff hist −4 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus →Defining some terms
- 15:14 15:14, 20 February 2024 diff hist 0 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus No edit summary
- 15:07 15:07, 20 February 2024 diff hist −24 Embassytown →Plot: general copy editing. Also, it doesn't really help the reader to keep switching between Ariekei and Hosts, apparently at random. current
- 13:13 13:13, 20 February 2024 diff hist −52 Embassytown →Plot: copy edit
- 13:09 13:09, 20 February 2024 diff hist +296 Embassytown →Plot: There is a planet worth of Arieki, no indication that they were all exposed. Add a little to the second half of the story; the breakaway of and later reconciliation with the Absurd via the new language / mind are important themes
- 12:55 12:55, 20 February 2024 diff hist −2 Embassytown →Plot: apologies, missed the additional context in the style section for exot
- 12:53 12:53, 20 February 2024 diff hist −197 Embassytown →Plot: lose edge of universe repetition and reference to immer travel being linked to physical distance, the novel explicity says this is not the case. Exots is not an explained term and isn't an important concept. The one mind is an essential part of Language. Not all similies are bizarre.
15 February 2024
- 08:15 08:15, 15 February 2024 diff hist −29 Alien: Covenant →Plot: remove praetomorph as not credited nor described as such in film, and no comments on talk page as of yet as to whether this is sourced. Also, clarified that only one alien had come out of Lopes' chest
14 February 2024
- 17:27 17:27, 14 February 2024 diff hist +4 m Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard →it is OR to use census data to produce a map?: ce
- 17:26 17:26, 14 February 2024 diff hist +267 Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard →it is OR to use census data to produce a map?
12 February 2024
- 11:57 11:57, 12 February 2024 diff hist +3 m Talk:Alien: Covenant →Proto/Praeto/Xenomorphs: ugh
- 11:57 11:57, 12 February 2024 diff hist +2 m Talk:Alien: Covenant →Proto/Praeto/Xenomorphs: ce
- 10:22 10:22, 12 February 2024 diff hist −85 Alien: Covenant →Plot: unnecessary detail
- 10:17 10:17, 12 February 2024 diff hist +124 Talk:Alien: Covenant →Proto/Praeto/Xenomorphs: add that I did have a look
- 10:14 10:14, 12 February 2024 diff hist +375 Talk:Alien: Covenant →Proto/Praeto/Xenomorphs: new section Tag: New topic
9 January 2024
- 08:21 08:21, 9 January 2024 diff hist +903 Wikipedia:Requests for comment/When there is no consensus either way →We have enough information. In principle, when there is truly no consensus, I believe we should err on the side of...: opine
24 December 2023
- 11:28 11:28, 24 December 2023 diff hist +369 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film →Fresh eyes requested at Blade Runner: new section Tag: New topic
- 09:21 09:21, 24 December 2023 diff hist +551 Talk:Blade Runner →Tech noir: reply
23 December 2023
- 22:17 22:17, 23 December 2023 diff hist −41 Blade Runner As per talk
- 22:13 22:13, 23 December 2023 diff hist +2,445 Talk:Blade Runner →Tech noir
9 November 2023
- 16:58 16:58, 9 November 2023 diff hist +3,008 Talk:Blade Runner →Tech noir: reply
8 November 2023
- 16:36 16:36, 8 November 2023 diff hist +1 Blade Runner Null edit. To clarify c the genre is exists and is notable, but not high quality sources are not often using it often enough when discussing BR imo to justify much info in this article (and certainly not the lead)
- 16:23 16:23, 8 November 2023 diff hist +6 Blade Runner a) I thought it lacked merit (i.e. DUE) not pertinence. b) it's still a crap source for a claim that it founded/inspired a film genre c) I never said that it wasn't notable, but the fact that next to no "real" sources talk about this & we have a zillion pointless categories are clues that this isn't a very established genre. Re-write to soften the claim (source says it's "one of the first tech noir films" & I found other equally bad sources that mentioned Metropolis & Alphaville
- 11:01 11:01, 8 November 2023 diff hist +876 User talk:WhatamIdoing →Some ramblings you might be interested in: late reply
- 08:16 08:16, 8 November 2023 diff hist −4 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus →So what does this mean?: ce
- 08:15 08:15, 8 November 2023 diff hist +26 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus →Defining some terms: also per WAID
- 08:12 08:12, 8 November 2023 diff hist +195 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus per WAID
- 07:48 07:48, 8 November 2023 diff hist −228 Blade Runner Disagree that this is appropriate for the lead. There's a lot of good sourcing available for this film, and a reference in a video game site with nothing in the article itself does not support the claim that is "often regarded as a foundational work of tech-noir", or that the film is a particularly notable element for this. If you think that this is something that should be developed then add it to the body (I don't think it even merits even that, we don't even have a category for the genre)
31 October 2023
- 10:12 10:12, 31 October 2023 diff hist +16 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus →Defining some terms
- 09:04 09:04, 31 October 2023 diff hist +516 User talk:WhatamIdoing →Some ramblings you might be interested in: new section Tag: New topic
- 09:04 09:04, 31 October 2023 diff hist −3 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus →Why is the concept of levels of consensus important?
- 08:56 08:56, 31 October 2023 diff hist −13 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus →Why is the concept of levels of consensus important?
- 08:52 08:52, 31 October 2023 diff hist +15 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus No edit summary
- 08:45 08:45, 31 October 2023 diff hist −1 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus →Some common, but not universally accepted, assumptions and related caveats
- 08:43 08:43, 31 October 2023 diff hist −223 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus →Some common, but not universally accepted, assumptions and related caveats
- 08:33 08:33, 31 October 2023 diff hist −5 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus →Some common, but not universally accepted, assumptions and related caveats
- 08:30 08:30, 31 October 2023 diff hist +20 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus →Why is the concept of levels of consensus important?
- 08:29 08:29, 31 October 2023 diff hist +18 User:Scribolt/Levels of consensus →Why is the concept of levels of consensus important?