08:2408:24, 16 September 2015diffhist+283
Vietnam War
a government source not being a RS is your POV. governmental sources are considered WP:RS on wiki. you have an issue with reliability, take it to the board. also do not revert to unsourced edits and original research
07:2607:26, 16 September 2015diffhist+283
Vietnam War
i suggest you take it to the talk page. many of the given troop numbers and casualties are original research while others are unreferenced
23:1723:17, 15 September 2015diffhist+236
Vietnam War
no. apparently you didn't bother reading the talk. also don't revert new referenced additions for old unreferenced ones. do not force and edit war
23:0323:03, 15 September 2015diffhist+236
Vietnam War
please check before and after edits. these are new additions which you deleted without even bothering to look if it's acceptedly referenced or not. which is tantamount to vandalizing. if you have an issue take it to talk page.i'm eager to hear your reason
08:2408:24, 16 September 2015diffhist+283
Vietnam War
a government source not being a RS is your POV. governmental sources are considered WP:RS on wiki. you have an issue with reliability, take it to the board. also do not revert to unsourced edits and original research
07:2607:26, 16 September 2015diffhist+283
Vietnam War
i suggest you take it to the talk page. many of the given troop numbers and casualties are original research while others are unreferenced
23:1723:17, 15 September 2015diffhist+236
Vietnam War
no. apparently you didn't bother reading the talk. also don't revert new referenced additions for old unreferenced ones. do not force and edit war
23:0323:03, 15 September 2015diffhist+236
Vietnam War
please check before and after edits. these are new additions which you deleted without even bothering to look if it's acceptedly referenced or not. which is tantamount to vandalizing. if you have an issue take it to talk page.i'm eager to hear your reason