Hey @ Pppery, great work creating this module.
I have a feature request: monthly totals.
It looks like it would be a small extra bit of coding, and it would be very handy to have e.g. at WP:Categories for discussion/Working#Discussions_awaiting_closure a quick summary of the form:
Even better, if there was a "totals only" parameter, then it could be wrapped in a template to make a wee indicator box for editors and admins to display on their userpages, just as many people display article alerts, WP:CENT etc. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 00:48, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
@
BrownHairedGirl: Is
{{
#invoke:XfD old/sandbox|bymonth}}
what you're looking for?
{{3x|p}}ery (
talk)
01:33, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
{{
#invoke:XfD old/sandbox|onemonth|month=March 2019|title=Wikipedia:Categories for discussion}}
-> 0
{{3x|p}}ery (
talk)
01:50, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Done. {{3x|p}}ery ( talk) 01:56, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Wonderful, @ Pppery!
{{ XFD backlog}} →
V | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CfD | 0 | 0 | 4 | 34 | 38 |
TfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
MfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
FfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
RfD | 0 | 0 | 4 | 30 | 34 |
AfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Are there any plans to support MfD and AFD? -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 02:16, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
@ BrownHairedGirl: You should probably template-protect Module:XfD old; the template being protected but not the module is causing the template to be part of a a tracking category I created. {{3x|p}}ery ( talk) 02:43, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
/Old unclosed discussions
pages.
{{3x|p}}ery (
talk)
02:25, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
{{
#invoke:XfD old/AfD and MfD|mfd|month=February 2019}}
-> 0. The same syntax works for AfD (use afd
instead of mfd
), but it would always produce zero right now since there are literally zero AfDs awaiting closure.
{{3x|p}}ery (
talk)
20:52, 15 March 2019 (UTC)@ Pppery, I have tested this at Template:XFD backlog/sandbox.
{{XFD backlog/sandbox}}
→
V | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CfD | 0 | 0 | 4 | 34 | 38 |
TfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
MfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
FfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
RfD | 0 | 0 | 4 | 30 | 34 |
AfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Does this look OK? -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 21:02, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
{{
#invoke:XfD old/AfD and MfD|afd/mfd}}
, {{
#invoke:XfD old/AfD and MfD|afd/mfd|month=total}}
(the later being a new feature I added just now)
* Pppery *
fades away
16:27, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
{{
#invoke:XfD old/AfD and MfD|afd/mfd}}
. --
BrownHairedGirl
(talk) • (
contribs)
16:35, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
V | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CfD | 0 | 0 | 4 | 34 | 38 |
TfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
MfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
FfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
RfD | 0 | 0 | 4 | 30 | 34 |
AfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
@ BrownHairedGirl, Pppery, and DannyS712: I'm not sure what was the result of the discussion above, but the current version of the template (to the right) does not include 19 articles from Category:AfD debates (Media and music) in the AfD count, for example. At least one discussion started on 22nd of June, and is still open. — andrybak ( talk) 18:46, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please replace with the current version of the sandbox ( diff). This wraps the list outputs with {{ Div col}} to reduce the height of the display and eliminate extraneous whitespace by using multiple columns. The results can be seen at the current #Testcases section above. Thanks, -- DannyS712 ( talk) 08:39, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
...Since their subpages do not include ".../Log/...". I'll have to see where this leads as I may try to change that. Steel1943 ( talk) 18:54, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Discussion transcluded to Wikipedia talk:Files for discussion. * Pppery * the end 21:32, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
The lack of section edit links in transcluded discussions is causing problems for XFDcloser, see WT:XFDC#On Wikipedia:Files for discussion.... It also makes finding and editing these discussions a bit less convenient. I've added code to the module sandbox that will find the section number and add an edit link for each transcluded discussion. Testing in edit preview mode of WP:FFD#Old discussions and WP:TFD#Old discussions shows only a slight increase in Lua time/memory usage. Is there any objection to adding these edit links, or any thoughts on how they should be styled? - Evad37 [ talk 01:24, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
With regard to edits like these: Special:Diff/982967202, Special:Diff/981216068. Should we automate this through a module, which checks the sum in columns? — andrybak ( talk) 14:18, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
@ Tavix: unless and until the actual RFD values can be included, I don't believe that an empty row should be shown. Would you please revert your edit pending discussion and consensus regarding such inclusion? I'm not going to revert myself since it would be an abuse of template editor rights, though I guess the guidance at Wikipedia:Template editor doesn't apply to admins? -- DannyS712 ( talk) 05:23, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Template:XFD backlog has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
{{ XFD backlog}}'s RfD link trolled me by linking to a section that didn't exist, so I'm requesting that the TOC is linked instead:
| [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion#{{#time:F j|-8 days}}|{{#invoke:XfD old/AfD and MfD|rfd|month=total}}]]
| [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion#toc|{{#invoke:XfD old/AfD and MfD|rfd|month=total}}]]
RAN1 ( talk) 03:44, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
There is a bug with the May 25 Old discussions at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion. The first item in the listed templates isn't bulleted like the rest. Gonnym ( talk) 05:35, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 June 23#Template:WIR is a level 4 heading, and it got really big so a level 5 heading called "Break" was added to it. Before I closed it, this module was listing "Break" as an un-closed discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Old discussions. It was cutting off and not showing Template:WIR at all. Might be worth fixing. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 18:19, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Hey @ Pppery, great work creating this module.
I have a feature request: monthly totals.
It looks like it would be a small extra bit of coding, and it would be very handy to have e.g. at WP:Categories for discussion/Working#Discussions_awaiting_closure a quick summary of the form:
Even better, if there was a "totals only" parameter, then it could be wrapped in a template to make a wee indicator box for editors and admins to display on their userpages, just as many people display article alerts, WP:CENT etc. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 00:48, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
@
BrownHairedGirl: Is
{{
#invoke:XfD old/sandbox|bymonth}}
what you're looking for?
{{3x|p}}ery (
talk)
01:33, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
{{
#invoke:XfD old/sandbox|onemonth|month=March 2019|title=Wikipedia:Categories for discussion}}
-> 0
{{3x|p}}ery (
talk)
01:50, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Done. {{3x|p}}ery ( talk) 01:56, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Wonderful, @ Pppery!
{{ XFD backlog}} →
V | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CfD | 0 | 0 | 4 | 34 | 38 |
TfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
MfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
FfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
RfD | 0 | 0 | 4 | 30 | 34 |
AfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Are there any plans to support MfD and AFD? -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 02:16, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
@ BrownHairedGirl: You should probably template-protect Module:XfD old; the template being protected but not the module is causing the template to be part of a a tracking category I created. {{3x|p}}ery ( talk) 02:43, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
/Old unclosed discussions
pages.
{{3x|p}}ery (
talk)
02:25, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
{{
#invoke:XfD old/AfD and MfD|mfd|month=February 2019}}
-> 0. The same syntax works for AfD (use afd
instead of mfd
), but it would always produce zero right now since there are literally zero AfDs awaiting closure.
{{3x|p}}ery (
talk)
20:52, 15 March 2019 (UTC)@ Pppery, I have tested this at Template:XFD backlog/sandbox.
{{XFD backlog/sandbox}}
→
V | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CfD | 0 | 0 | 4 | 34 | 38 |
TfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
MfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
FfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
RfD | 0 | 0 | 4 | 30 | 34 |
AfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Does this look OK? -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 21:02, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
{{
#invoke:XfD old/AfD and MfD|afd/mfd}}
, {{
#invoke:XfD old/AfD and MfD|afd/mfd|month=total}}
(the later being a new feature I added just now)
* Pppery *
fades away
16:27, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
{{
#invoke:XfD old/AfD and MfD|afd/mfd}}
. --
BrownHairedGirl
(talk) • (
contribs)
16:35, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
V | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CfD | 0 | 0 | 4 | 34 | 38 |
TfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
MfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
FfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
RfD | 0 | 0 | 4 | 30 | 34 |
AfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
@ BrownHairedGirl, Pppery, and DannyS712: I'm not sure what was the result of the discussion above, but the current version of the template (to the right) does not include 19 articles from Category:AfD debates (Media and music) in the AfD count, for example. At least one discussion started on 22nd of June, and is still open. — andrybak ( talk) 18:46, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please replace with the current version of the sandbox ( diff). This wraps the list outputs with {{ Div col}} to reduce the height of the display and eliminate extraneous whitespace by using multiple columns. The results can be seen at the current #Testcases section above. Thanks, -- DannyS712 ( talk) 08:39, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
...Since their subpages do not include ".../Log/...". I'll have to see where this leads as I may try to change that. Steel1943 ( talk) 18:54, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Discussion transcluded to Wikipedia talk:Files for discussion. * Pppery * the end 21:32, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
The lack of section edit links in transcluded discussions is causing problems for XFDcloser, see WT:XFDC#On Wikipedia:Files for discussion.... It also makes finding and editing these discussions a bit less convenient. I've added code to the module sandbox that will find the section number and add an edit link for each transcluded discussion. Testing in edit preview mode of WP:FFD#Old discussions and WP:TFD#Old discussions shows only a slight increase in Lua time/memory usage. Is there any objection to adding these edit links, or any thoughts on how they should be styled? - Evad37 [ talk 01:24, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
With regard to edits like these: Special:Diff/982967202, Special:Diff/981216068. Should we automate this through a module, which checks the sum in columns? — andrybak ( talk) 14:18, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
@ Tavix: unless and until the actual RFD values can be included, I don't believe that an empty row should be shown. Would you please revert your edit pending discussion and consensus regarding such inclusion? I'm not going to revert myself since it would be an abuse of template editor rights, though I guess the guidance at Wikipedia:Template editor doesn't apply to admins? -- DannyS712 ( talk) 05:23, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Template:XFD backlog has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
{{ XFD backlog}}'s RfD link trolled me by linking to a section that didn't exist, so I'm requesting that the TOC is linked instead:
| [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion#{{#time:F j|-8 days}}|{{#invoke:XfD old/AfD and MfD|rfd|month=total}}]]
| [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion#toc|{{#invoke:XfD old/AfD and MfD|rfd|month=total}}]]
RAN1 ( talk) 03:44, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
There is a bug with the May 25 Old discussions at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion. The first item in the listed templates isn't bulleted like the rest. Gonnym ( talk) 05:35, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 June 23#Template:WIR is a level 4 heading, and it got really big so a level 5 heading called "Break" was added to it. Before I closed it, this module was listing "Break" as an un-closed discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Old discussions. It was cutting off and not showing Template:WIR at all. Might be worth fixing. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 18:19, 14 July 2023 (UTC)