Userboxes | ||||
|
As the number of edits get higher, is it possible to shrink the text in the icon box somehow? Otherwise, theoretically, we could end up with this:
100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000+ |
JPG-GR
00:22, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000+ |
100, 000,000, 000,000, 000,000, 000,000+ |
100,000,000, 000,000,000, 000,000,000+ |
1026+ |
I have added a table on the documentation page showing the colors that were used for each range in the original templates, in case users want to emulate these. -- PhantomS 08:33, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
The Color Reference is broken, {{ Template:User 10e}} does not exist, and the other ones don't exist either. Tcrow777 talk 20:27, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Before this page goes much further into "mass-effect", I'd like to suggest a more specific rename to Template:User edit count. "contrib" is too vague for the usage, and could mean any number of things. - jc37 17:17, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
The list currently on the page was generated by Gracenotes ( talk · contribs) specifically to be used for the merger of the existing edit count userboxes to the use of this one. Therefor I have move it here, in its entirety rather than transcluding it. Adam McCormick 04:06, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
APerson ( talk!) 14:18, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Would anyone support me in re-adding the ", and as a result may be slightly insane" text for contribution numbers over 100,000? This would be the simple addition of two ParserFunctions, one inside the other:
Wikipedia.
would become "Wikipedia{{#ifeq:{{#expr: {{{1}}} > 100000}}|1|, and as a result may be slightly insane|<!--null-->}}.
I think it'd be nice, since this improves the emulation of the old templates, but I don't know what other people think. What's your opinion? Nihiltres( t. c. s) 22:47, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
If as seems likely per Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2007_May_5#Numerous_edit-count_userboxes this box will replace all the existing boxes, shouldn't it output categories like the other boxes do? -- kingboyk 17:33, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
When I use the userbox, I get a 200+ edits boxs with the number in white! Take a look to see what I mean: User:PostScript/ImportantBoxes —The preceding unsigned comment was added by PostScript ( talk • contribs) 17:59, 13 May 2007 (UTC).
I got an 'Expression error: Unrecognised punctuation character "?"' with the userbox today. I'm assuming it was because I stuck a ³ in which messes up the script. Is it possible to be able to use the old userbox for now, until the script is finalised.
Not only did it mess up my userbox, for some bizarre reason it messed up the __NOTOC__ magic word! Centy 13:03, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi. A minor issue: there's an extra line at the bottom of the template that is transcluding onto user pages. This is generally not an issue except when the userbox is placed in a table or next to other userboxes. See, for example, the transclusions here and here. Could someone please fix it? Thanks, Black Falcon ( Talk) 18:06, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
The categories corresponding to this template are all up for deletion, please weight in at the discussion if you care. Adam McCormick 04:36, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
In the sentence "This user has made over 100,000 contributions to Wikipedia, and, as a result, may be slightly insane," the comma after "Wikipedia" shouldn't be there. It's a list with two items, and a comma only needed with three or more (and even then, it's optional). I tried to fix it myself, but in removing the comma, it wound up displaying as "...to Wikipediaand, as..." -- Brandon Dilbeck 07:02, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
I propose a new box/colour for 150,000 contribs, as some users have attained/are close to attaining this number of contribs. I propose that this box be really really outstanding, with loyd colours etc. What does everyone think? -- Anonymous Dissident Talk 09:36, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Is there anyway I can change where the link goes to? I'd like it to go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Rockfang instead of where it currently goes. Rockfang ( talk) 12:21, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Is there a way to make this same thing work for a Wikia project? or is there already one on wikia? if you could respond on my talk page that would be great. Thanks! Sirkad talk 03:05, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Recently there was an edit concerning which edit counter this template should use. I have always been of the opinion that the counter by wantanabe_kate is the best (and easiest to read) out there. The new edit pointed here I think there needs to be more discussion before this is made the default. If the new link is decided to be "better" I'll add a parameter to allow the original as I find it much more legible. Adam McCormick ( talk) 06:37, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
{{User contrib|100}} makes:
100+ |
{{User contrib|100|link=http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/count_edits?user={{urlencode:{{BASEPAGENAME}}}}&dbname=enwiki_p}} makes:
100+ |
{{User contrib|100|link=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Alanbly}} makes:
100+ |
Noticed that since the last change, any boxes with a comma in them break. Compare
49,000+ |
with
49,000+ |
Lugnuts (
talk)
21:20, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Just letting everyone know that I added a new parameter to the template that when a user adds unique=X to the variables it adds the text "X of which are unique". E.g. "This user has made over 826 contributions to Wikipedia , 448 of which are unique." or "This user has made over 826 contributions to Wikipedia , 448 of which are unique and X of which are deleted" . It has all been fixed so that it doesn't interfere with the deleted= variable. I added this when I noticed that wannabe_kate lists the number of unique edits per page and I think that would be a useful thing for a user to display as well as their total edit count. Happy Editing! Atyndall93 | talk 11:47, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Prior to my long absence starting back around October 2006, I had the thought to merge these templates and to give them a new color scheme as well. If anyone is interested, click here. Also, there is another template that is floating around which seems to be a duplicate of this one User mainspace edits. If there are differences between the two, it is suggested they be merged and one deleted. - LA @ 07:55, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Would it be possible to create a second Babel with all contributions of a single user to all projects of Wikimedia? Marcus Cyron ( talk) 00:58, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
the top+ |
I am a member of the wiki Lostpedia. I copied this template and edited it onto there at [2].But it will not display correctly [3]. I copied my version to my page on Wikipedia and it works [4] [5]. Does anyone know why this is?-- Connor401 ( talk) 20:25, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Is there a way to change the link from showing Kate's Tool to SQL's Tool, which shows deleted contributions? Ctjf83 Talk 18:58, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
The query.php link is dead so this needs to be updated. Snappy56 ( talk) 08:56, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
I've copied this template and created {{
User contrib SUL}}. Is it an idea to specify in this template that this is a count for the English language wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)?
Nsaa (
talk)
22:44, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
I'm reposting the tag because this suggestion wasn't discussed. I'm with Marcus, if you really want to specify English Wikipedia it should be a flag you can set, not the default. Please change it back or make it a parameter. Adam McCormick ( talk) 00:27, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
{{editprotected}}
Currently this userbox expands vertically if the text if forced onto three lines. This can be fixed by reducing the line height slightly. Change the line beginning:
| style="font-size: 8pt; padding: 4pt; line-height: 1.25em; color:
to read
| style="font-size: 8pt; padding: 4pt; line-height: 1.1em; color:
Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 18:58, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Reading all of the above (if I haven't overlooked something), the user boxes seem limited to the contributions in one Wikipedia only. What can a user do who has >5000 contributions in the English Wikipedia and >3000 in the German? One user box with 5000 or 8000? Or two user boxes??-- Ratzer ( talk) 08:18, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
8,000+ |
8,000+ |
5,000+ |
3,000+ |
It says it has a 69 hour high database server tag, but when I use the wannabe kate tool, it counts fine.-- Tr uc o 23:45, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Could we make the 30,000+ edits golden-ish instead of purple? Considering that once you pass 30,000, the colors never change, I'd rather look at a lighter color than purple. Gary King ( talk) 19:47, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
Could this template be changed so that it uses the {{
Userbox}} template. I've done a version in the
sandbox which does that. So can it be copied over. Thanks. --
WOSlinker (
talk)
18:20, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
"There are various edit counters here."
The "here" link is broken, just thought I should let somebody know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iankap99 ( talk • contribs) 22:26, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
May I suggest the addition of bot=(yes|no)
, script=(yes|no)
, script_wrote=(yes|no)
, broke=(yes|no)
and busted=(yes|no)
parameters which may encourage bot and script users to be more honest in their edit counts. As in: "I've made 20,000 edits to Wikipedia, 19,783 of which were by a script, but I wrote it myself, and it only broke 17 articles, and I never got busted for it!" --
Lexein (
talk)
14:30, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Regardless of the setting of |lang=
, the link to Soxred's edit counter stays as English Wikipedia, although the text changes. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
16:52, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Would it be possible to add a parameter so that other projects can be specified? For example |project=Wikimedia Commons
would show that string instead of "Wikipedia". This will also allow combinations such as |lang=French
|project=Wiktionary
. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
16:56, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add "|id-p=2px" to make large edit numbers more legible. Yours aye, Buaidh 17:33, 11 April 2011 (UTC) Buaidh 17:33, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
Can the template be copied to other language wikipedias? If yes, how do we do the attribution, since a simple copy-paste would attribute it to the copier. Thanks.-- Siddhartha Ghai ( talk) 00:34, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
I'd just like to humbly request some sort of Easter egg when an editor's count is over 9000. -- BDD ( talk) 18:54, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please replace http://toolserver.org/~tparis/pcount/index.php?name={{urlencode:{{{2|{{BASEPAGENAME}}}}}}}&lang=en&wiki=wikipedia
with http://toolserver.org/~River/cgi-bin/count_edits?user={{urlencode:{{{2|{{BASEPAGENAME}}}}}}}&dbname=enwiki_p
for the time being.
TParis' tools are currently down, and it's unknown how long it will take before his tools are up and running again. Right now, the link does not work. Thanks in advance,
Hey
Mid (
contribs)
16:32, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The text should read "This user has made more than..." not "This user has made over..." Please can this be changed. Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:49, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The additional count for the number of article-space edits made should also have commas; as you can see in this example, 2,038 is missing a comma:
3,123+ |
This could be done using the {{formatnum:<NUMBER>}}
magic word.
APerson (
talk!) 14:25, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
APerson (
talk!)
01:58, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
{{#switch: {{{format|yes}}}|yes = '''{{FORMATNUM:{{{articles}}}}}'''|no = '''{{{articles}}}'''}}
so that it is only formated when the top number is formated. Happy editing!
Technical 13 (
talk)
05:18, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
{{#switch:}}
when there are only two outcomes (comma or no comma)? One of the {{#if:}}
variants would be far more efficient. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
20:50, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
'''{{#ifeq:{{{format|}}}|no|{{{articles}}}|{{FORMATNUM:{{{articles}}} }} }}'''
--
Redrose64 (
talk)
11:01, 29 January 2014 (UTC)This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change {{{link|http://tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/pcount/index.php?name={{urlencode:{{{2|{{BASEPAGENAME}}}}}}}&wiki=wikipedia&lang=en}} to {{{link|//tools.wmflabs.org/supercount/index.php?user={{urlencode:{{{2|{{BASEPAGENAME}}}}}}}&project=en.wikipedia}}, because that's the new location of the edit counter. Armbrust The Homunculus 17:18, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Make a ,
appear in e.g. 30351 when it is in
as the rest of the template. See
User:Josve05a/userboxes that it is not doing that.
(
t)
Josve05a (
c)
21:27, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
|distinct=
30351
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add formatnum to the parameter |deleted=
as well. See above request.
(
t)
Josve05a (
c)
08:58, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
The stats link doesn't make any sense for the |log=yes
option. That should change it to a link to some tool that actually counts log actions. In the interim I've made it be the Special:Log&user=
link, as better than nothing.
I also added, tested and documented a |projsite=
parameter, e.g. |projsite=commons.wikimedia
or |projsite=fr.wiktinoary
to change the stats link to be correct when |project=
is used. —
SMcCandlish ☺
☏
¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼
12:42, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
I propose removing the |total=yes
feature, as it is malfunctional and serves no purpose any longer. The link it creates goes to some XML gibberish that provides inaccurate stats, at least for users who've been on the system a long time (they're supposed to include all edits, even deleted, but in my case the number reported there is lower than the count produced minus deleted edits, by the external too. The external too in main link, meanwhile, provides both non-deleted and total edit counts. A third problem is that it doesn't show in the right place in complex uses of the template (it should have always been immediately after the regular number of edits (i.e. parameter 1) as formatted in the template output, and before add-on stats like those produced by |distinct=
and other such parameters; it didn't make any sense at the very end, after such parameters' output. —
SMcCandlish ☺
☏
¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼
12:42, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
When insane=yes as well as deleted=# are used, the userbox ends up looking like this:
9,001+ |
This implies that the pages that were deleted may be slightly insane. I'm not sure where else to put the phrase generated by insane=yes; maybe the words "This user" could be added in front of "may be slightly insane" if deleted=# is used? APerson ( talk!) 22:05, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Needs updating for the new edit counter (so mine would be [8] instead of [9], for example) Thanks. :) -- AmaryllisGardener talk 21:08, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The xtools link was wonky all last weekend and it now goes to a 404 message. Can we please switch back to the old edit counter (I just checked and though it takes about a minute to load it is still working) - at least until the xtools one is working again? If not no worries and thanks for your time. MarnetteD| Talk 03:43, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Site has been moved, requesting links be updated. DragonZero ( Talk · Contribs) 11:27, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
xtools is down again.
{{ User contrib SUL}} uses this link: Special:CentralAuth. See:
49,000+ |
This is the link in that template:
It has separate numbers for many Wikimedia projects, and for Wikipedias in many languages. -- Timeshifter ( talk) 14:03, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
{{
edit template-protected}}
template. xTools seems to be working to me. The only time there has been any outages that I'm aware of (as an xTools maintainer) in the recent past have been due to Labs restarts and maintenance and outages. If you see xTools down, I encourage you to wait 15 minutes and try again (there is an automatic restarting tool for when things go wrong that checks every 15 minutes) and if it's still not working ping the tool maintainers. We all have talk pages and I believe we all have email available. — {{U|
Technical 13}} (
e •
t •
c)
01:52, 12 March 2015 (UTC)Whole server is non-responsive as of this moment. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 06:33, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
I'm not sure if I got this right: do you really have to manually fill in the edit-counts yourself? Or is there some bot already doing that automatically?
The
userpages on mobile already feature automatic edit-counts, so why isn't there a way to have these on the usual pages?
Or should I ask about this at
Wikipedia:Village pump?
--
Fixuture (
talk)
20:34, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Many of the colours used in this template are not compliant with WP:COLOR – that is, they do not meet the WCAG 2 AAA Compliancy level. I've taken the chance to modify the colours myself in my sandbox: these are the colours before modification, and these are the colours after modification – the colours (text and background) that have been changed are displayed in bold in the former link. I recommend that these be updated as soon as possible, to comply with policy. Alex| The| Whovian 17:33, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
I've taken the chance to modify the colours myself in my sandbox. Alex| The| Whovian 15:06, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Revisiting this, this has now been done in the sandbox, and can now be updated in the live version. Test cases are available in the specific subpage - the revised versions are on the left, whereas the original/current version is on the right. Alex| The| Whovian 13:49, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The template supports the additions of deleted contributions, distinct pages, images, etc. Per the sandbox, I've added automated contributions (e.g. Twinkle, AWB, etc). Example in test cases, code in sandbox ready to deploy. Alex|The|Whovian ? 03:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi all,
I'm sorry if I was being a little dim here, but is there any way to auto update the amounts recorded for this infobox? We have Special:Contributions, which gives a numerical amount on the list, is there a way to import this into the infobox, so that it doesn't need to be updated manually? It seems a little odd that we have the ability to see the amount, but no way to make this value appear in the infobox.
Of course, I could have simply missed it. Please let me know if this is/isn't possible. Many Thanks Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 11:00, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
#!/usr/bin/env python3
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
#
#/*
#* Copyright (C) 2019 Jimmy Olano (http://www.ks7000.net.ve/)
#*
#* This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
#* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
#* the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
#* https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html any later version.
#* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
#* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
#* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
#* GNU General Public License for more details.
#*
#* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
#* along with this program. If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
#*
#* Special thanks to Kenneth Reitz for created "Requests" <http for humans>
#* https://requests.kennethreitz.org/en/master/dev/authors/
#*/
import requests
from bs4 import BeautifulSoup
user = "Jimmy_Olano"
url = "https://xtools.wmflabs.org/ec/en.wikipedia.org/"+user
my_headers = {'User-Agent': 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_10_1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/39.0.2171.95 Safari/537.36'}
try:
page = requests.get(url, headers=my_headers)
if page.status_code == "200":
wiki_soup = BeautifulSoup(page.text, 'html.parser')
count_edits = wiki_soup.find_all(class_="xt-test--total-edits")[0].get_text()
print(_("User "+user+" has "+count_edits+" editions."))
except:
print(_("No connection with wmflabs!"));
As more people break the 100,000 edits mark, any objection to adding a few more color patterns? I'm happy to do it... -- Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 18:45, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
So I've decided to redo this template and make use of a module to do some much better calculations. This is in the VERY early stages and I would welcome any and all input! My thinking is that rather than having seemingly random colors, lets actually do things in a progressive way. He is my current plan of attack:
Right now this is just food for thought. I'm still playing with how to do it, but would welcome any ideas!
-- Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 19:13, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
This template is now generating errors on hundreds of user pages, judging from the latest additions to Category:Pages with script errors. Please restore the previous non-module version to fix the errors until the errors are fixed. JohnBlackburne words deeds 23:20, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Old:
1+ |
New:
1+ |
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
100,000+ |
Not sure if anyone's aware but the 100000 userbox above has been changed from black background/yellow text to yellow background/black text which looks rather odd, Wasn't sure if this should be changed back ?, Thanks –
Davey2010
Talk
17:58, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
@
Zackmann08: did you recently remove the logs=yes
parameter? If so will you be restoring this? —
xaosflux
Talk
15:17, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
I'm trying to use the instructions on the template page to change the colors of the template on my user page, using the id-bg, info-bg, border, id-font, and info-font parameters, but it doesn't seem to be working. What am I doing wrong?
45,000+ |
—
Mudwater (
Talk)
13:07, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
This user has autoconfirmed rights on the English Wikipedia. ( verify) |
@ Mudwater: so this is all based off of {{ Userbox}} so that's where you will find the documentation and just a reminder you can always create your own custom box. But let me see if I can't do it for ya...
45,000+ |
Hope that helps. --
Zackmann (
Talk to me/
What I been doing)
18:54, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Where have all the colours gone? In the past, the colours of this userbox varied according to the value fed in, and this is described at Template:User contrib#Color reference (expand the box). Now it's always two shades of grey, whatever the value. -- Redrose64 🌹 ( talk) 18:42, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
For anyone who wants to see the colors used for separate edit count templates for reference, click here. The template has been archived in the Wayback Machine. CHICHI7YT ( talk) 19:58, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Module:User contrib has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please merge
Module:User contrib/sandbox into
Module:User contrib, and
Template:User contrib/doc/sandbox into
Template:User contrib/doc. They are both identical, apart from the |reverted=
parameter, which I added, to show deleted edits instead of just edits to deleted pages.
WT79 (
Speak to me |
account info) 06:50, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
The sandbox also re-adds the |link=
parameter, which was lost during conversion to lua.
WT79 (
Speak to me |
account info)
07:32, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
deleted=
parameter.
WT79 (
Speak to me |
account info)
06:46, 22 June 2020 (UTC)|link=
parameter to sandbox so have temporally closed this request.
WT79 (
Speak to me |
account info)
07:01, 22 June 2020 (UTC)|deleted=
, |reverted=
, |articles=
, and |automated=
parameters, and a similar issue is present if the |distinct=
and |unique=
parameters are used together.
WT79 (
Speak to me |
account info)
07:30, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
The link=
parameter appears to be broken. This can be seen in the examples in doc. Does anyone know what is causing this issue, and how to fix?
WT79 (
Speak to me |
account info)
14:16, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
|link=
has been lost during
template's conversion into a Lua module.
Module:User contrib simply doesn't support it. —
andrybak (
talk)
23:08, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
|link=
, it looks like the conversion to use a Lua module was never tested thoroughly and was never finished. It may be best to revert to the previous non-Lua version. –
Jonesey95 (
talk)
01:45, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Module:User contrib has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please merge
Module:User contrib/sandbox into
Module:User contrib. It should be identical to the current version apart from that it re-adds the |link=
parameter (with alias |url=
), which was lost when the template was converted to lua.
WT79 (
Speak to me |
account info)
09:46, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Instead of me manually changing over time. Can we make a userbox that detects your contributions? -- MirahezeGuy ( talk) 15:38, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
269,000+ |
{{
adminstats}}
, for example {{
adminstats|Redrose64|style=raw ed+del}}
emits 269813 which I can then use thus: {{User contrib|{{rounddown|{{adminstats|Redrose64|style=raw ed+del}}|-3}}|Redrose64}}
, see right. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
21:04, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
I have opened a phab ticket requesting a magic word that would allow this template to be updated automatically. See phab:T278506. {{u| Sdkb}} talk 02:57, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Unless I am misunderstanding the documentation, it appears that |linked=no
does not work. I also tried blank |link=
and blank |url=
, but in each case, the link in the body of the userbox is generated. Please see
this testcase.
My goal is to provide an option for editors who have added a wikilink to the edit count, as in the second testcase. I think this used to work fine, but now it creates a "wikilink inside external link" Linter error. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:34, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Userboxes | ||||
|
As the number of edits get higher, is it possible to shrink the text in the icon box somehow? Otherwise, theoretically, we could end up with this:
100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000+ |
JPG-GR
00:22, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000+ |
100, 000,000, 000,000, 000,000, 000,000+ |
100,000,000, 000,000,000, 000,000,000+ |
1026+ |
I have added a table on the documentation page showing the colors that were used for each range in the original templates, in case users want to emulate these. -- PhantomS 08:33, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
The Color Reference is broken, {{ Template:User 10e}} does not exist, and the other ones don't exist either. Tcrow777 talk 20:27, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Before this page goes much further into "mass-effect", I'd like to suggest a more specific rename to Template:User edit count. "contrib" is too vague for the usage, and could mean any number of things. - jc37 17:17, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
The list currently on the page was generated by Gracenotes ( talk · contribs) specifically to be used for the merger of the existing edit count userboxes to the use of this one. Therefor I have move it here, in its entirety rather than transcluding it. Adam McCormick 04:06, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
APerson ( talk!) 14:18, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Would anyone support me in re-adding the ", and as a result may be slightly insane" text for contribution numbers over 100,000? This would be the simple addition of two ParserFunctions, one inside the other:
Wikipedia.
would become "Wikipedia{{#ifeq:{{#expr: {{{1}}} > 100000}}|1|, and as a result may be slightly insane|<!--null-->}}.
I think it'd be nice, since this improves the emulation of the old templates, but I don't know what other people think. What's your opinion? Nihiltres( t. c. s) 22:47, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
If as seems likely per Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2007_May_5#Numerous_edit-count_userboxes this box will replace all the existing boxes, shouldn't it output categories like the other boxes do? -- kingboyk 17:33, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
When I use the userbox, I get a 200+ edits boxs with the number in white! Take a look to see what I mean: User:PostScript/ImportantBoxes —The preceding unsigned comment was added by PostScript ( talk • contribs) 17:59, 13 May 2007 (UTC).
I got an 'Expression error: Unrecognised punctuation character "?"' with the userbox today. I'm assuming it was because I stuck a ³ in which messes up the script. Is it possible to be able to use the old userbox for now, until the script is finalised.
Not only did it mess up my userbox, for some bizarre reason it messed up the __NOTOC__ magic word! Centy 13:03, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi. A minor issue: there's an extra line at the bottom of the template that is transcluding onto user pages. This is generally not an issue except when the userbox is placed in a table or next to other userboxes. See, for example, the transclusions here and here. Could someone please fix it? Thanks, Black Falcon ( Talk) 18:06, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
The categories corresponding to this template are all up for deletion, please weight in at the discussion if you care. Adam McCormick 04:36, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
In the sentence "This user has made over 100,000 contributions to Wikipedia, and, as a result, may be slightly insane," the comma after "Wikipedia" shouldn't be there. It's a list with two items, and a comma only needed with three or more (and even then, it's optional). I tried to fix it myself, but in removing the comma, it wound up displaying as "...to Wikipediaand, as..." -- Brandon Dilbeck 07:02, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
I propose a new box/colour for 150,000 contribs, as some users have attained/are close to attaining this number of contribs. I propose that this box be really really outstanding, with loyd colours etc. What does everyone think? -- Anonymous Dissident Talk 09:36, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Is there anyway I can change where the link goes to? I'd like it to go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Rockfang instead of where it currently goes. Rockfang ( talk) 12:21, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Is there a way to make this same thing work for a Wikia project? or is there already one on wikia? if you could respond on my talk page that would be great. Thanks! Sirkad talk 03:05, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Recently there was an edit concerning which edit counter this template should use. I have always been of the opinion that the counter by wantanabe_kate is the best (and easiest to read) out there. The new edit pointed here I think there needs to be more discussion before this is made the default. If the new link is decided to be "better" I'll add a parameter to allow the original as I find it much more legible. Adam McCormick ( talk) 06:37, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
{{User contrib|100}} makes:
100+ |
{{User contrib|100|link=http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/count_edits?user={{urlencode:{{BASEPAGENAME}}}}&dbname=enwiki_p}} makes:
100+ |
{{User contrib|100|link=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Alanbly}} makes:
100+ |
Noticed that since the last change, any boxes with a comma in them break. Compare
49,000+ |
with
49,000+ |
Lugnuts (
talk)
21:20, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Just letting everyone know that I added a new parameter to the template that when a user adds unique=X to the variables it adds the text "X of which are unique". E.g. "This user has made over 826 contributions to Wikipedia , 448 of which are unique." or "This user has made over 826 contributions to Wikipedia , 448 of which are unique and X of which are deleted" . It has all been fixed so that it doesn't interfere with the deleted= variable. I added this when I noticed that wannabe_kate lists the number of unique edits per page and I think that would be a useful thing for a user to display as well as their total edit count. Happy Editing! Atyndall93 | talk 11:47, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Prior to my long absence starting back around October 2006, I had the thought to merge these templates and to give them a new color scheme as well. If anyone is interested, click here. Also, there is another template that is floating around which seems to be a duplicate of this one User mainspace edits. If there are differences between the two, it is suggested they be merged and one deleted. - LA @ 07:55, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Would it be possible to create a second Babel with all contributions of a single user to all projects of Wikimedia? Marcus Cyron ( talk) 00:58, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
the top+ |
I am a member of the wiki Lostpedia. I copied this template and edited it onto there at [2].But it will not display correctly [3]. I copied my version to my page on Wikipedia and it works [4] [5]. Does anyone know why this is?-- Connor401 ( talk) 20:25, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Is there a way to change the link from showing Kate's Tool to SQL's Tool, which shows deleted contributions? Ctjf83 Talk 18:58, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
The query.php link is dead so this needs to be updated. Snappy56 ( talk) 08:56, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
I've copied this template and created {{
User contrib SUL}}. Is it an idea to specify in this template that this is a count for the English language wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)?
Nsaa (
talk)
22:44, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
I'm reposting the tag because this suggestion wasn't discussed. I'm with Marcus, if you really want to specify English Wikipedia it should be a flag you can set, not the default. Please change it back or make it a parameter. Adam McCormick ( talk) 00:27, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
{{editprotected}}
Currently this userbox expands vertically if the text if forced onto three lines. This can be fixed by reducing the line height slightly. Change the line beginning:
| style="font-size: 8pt; padding: 4pt; line-height: 1.25em; color:
to read
| style="font-size: 8pt; padding: 4pt; line-height: 1.1em; color:
Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 18:58, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Reading all of the above (if I haven't overlooked something), the user boxes seem limited to the contributions in one Wikipedia only. What can a user do who has >5000 contributions in the English Wikipedia and >3000 in the German? One user box with 5000 or 8000? Or two user boxes??-- Ratzer ( talk) 08:18, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
8,000+ |
8,000+ |
5,000+ |
3,000+ |
It says it has a 69 hour high database server tag, but when I use the wannabe kate tool, it counts fine.-- Tr uc o 23:45, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Could we make the 30,000+ edits golden-ish instead of purple? Considering that once you pass 30,000, the colors never change, I'd rather look at a lighter color than purple. Gary King ( talk) 19:47, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
Could this template be changed so that it uses the {{
Userbox}} template. I've done a version in the
sandbox which does that. So can it be copied over. Thanks. --
WOSlinker (
talk)
18:20, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
"There are various edit counters here."
The "here" link is broken, just thought I should let somebody know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iankap99 ( talk • contribs) 22:26, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
May I suggest the addition of bot=(yes|no)
, script=(yes|no)
, script_wrote=(yes|no)
, broke=(yes|no)
and busted=(yes|no)
parameters which may encourage bot and script users to be more honest in their edit counts. As in: "I've made 20,000 edits to Wikipedia, 19,783 of which were by a script, but I wrote it myself, and it only broke 17 articles, and I never got busted for it!" --
Lexein (
talk)
14:30, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Regardless of the setting of |lang=
, the link to Soxred's edit counter stays as English Wikipedia, although the text changes. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
16:52, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Would it be possible to add a parameter so that other projects can be specified? For example |project=Wikimedia Commons
would show that string instead of "Wikipedia". This will also allow combinations such as |lang=French
|project=Wiktionary
. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
16:56, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add "|id-p=2px" to make large edit numbers more legible. Yours aye, Buaidh 17:33, 11 April 2011 (UTC) Buaidh 17:33, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
Can the template be copied to other language wikipedias? If yes, how do we do the attribution, since a simple copy-paste would attribute it to the copier. Thanks.-- Siddhartha Ghai ( talk) 00:34, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
I'd just like to humbly request some sort of Easter egg when an editor's count is over 9000. -- BDD ( talk) 18:54, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please replace http://toolserver.org/~tparis/pcount/index.php?name={{urlencode:{{{2|{{BASEPAGENAME}}}}}}}&lang=en&wiki=wikipedia
with http://toolserver.org/~River/cgi-bin/count_edits?user={{urlencode:{{{2|{{BASEPAGENAME}}}}}}}&dbname=enwiki_p
for the time being.
TParis' tools are currently down, and it's unknown how long it will take before his tools are up and running again. Right now, the link does not work. Thanks in advance,
Hey
Mid (
contribs)
16:32, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The text should read "This user has made more than..." not "This user has made over..." Please can this be changed. Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:49, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The additional count for the number of article-space edits made should also have commas; as you can see in this example, 2,038 is missing a comma:
3,123+ |
This could be done using the {{formatnum:<NUMBER>}}
magic word.
APerson (
talk!) 14:25, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
APerson (
talk!)
01:58, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
{{#switch: {{{format|yes}}}|yes = '''{{FORMATNUM:{{{articles}}}}}'''|no = '''{{{articles}}}'''}}
so that it is only formated when the top number is formated. Happy editing!
Technical 13 (
talk)
05:18, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
{{#switch:}}
when there are only two outcomes (comma or no comma)? One of the {{#if:}}
variants would be far more efficient. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
20:50, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
'''{{#ifeq:{{{format|}}}|no|{{{articles}}}|{{FORMATNUM:{{{articles}}} }} }}'''
--
Redrose64 (
talk)
11:01, 29 January 2014 (UTC)This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change {{{link|http://tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/pcount/index.php?name={{urlencode:{{{2|{{BASEPAGENAME}}}}}}}&wiki=wikipedia&lang=en}} to {{{link|//tools.wmflabs.org/supercount/index.php?user={{urlencode:{{{2|{{BASEPAGENAME}}}}}}}&project=en.wikipedia}}, because that's the new location of the edit counter. Armbrust The Homunculus 17:18, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Make a ,
appear in e.g. 30351 when it is in
as the rest of the template. See
User:Josve05a/userboxes that it is not doing that.
(
t)
Josve05a (
c)
21:27, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
|distinct=
30351
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add formatnum to the parameter |deleted=
as well. See above request.
(
t)
Josve05a (
c)
08:58, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
The stats link doesn't make any sense for the |log=yes
option. That should change it to a link to some tool that actually counts log actions. In the interim I've made it be the Special:Log&user=
link, as better than nothing.
I also added, tested and documented a |projsite=
parameter, e.g. |projsite=commons.wikimedia
or |projsite=fr.wiktinoary
to change the stats link to be correct when |project=
is used. —
SMcCandlish ☺
☏
¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼
12:42, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
I propose removing the |total=yes
feature, as it is malfunctional and serves no purpose any longer. The link it creates goes to some XML gibberish that provides inaccurate stats, at least for users who've been on the system a long time (they're supposed to include all edits, even deleted, but in my case the number reported there is lower than the count produced minus deleted edits, by the external too. The external too in main link, meanwhile, provides both non-deleted and total edit counts. A third problem is that it doesn't show in the right place in complex uses of the template (it should have always been immediately after the regular number of edits (i.e. parameter 1) as formatted in the template output, and before add-on stats like those produced by |distinct=
and other such parameters; it didn't make any sense at the very end, after such parameters' output. —
SMcCandlish ☺
☏
¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼
12:42, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
When insane=yes as well as deleted=# are used, the userbox ends up looking like this:
9,001+ |
This implies that the pages that were deleted may be slightly insane. I'm not sure where else to put the phrase generated by insane=yes; maybe the words "This user" could be added in front of "may be slightly insane" if deleted=# is used? APerson ( talk!) 22:05, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Needs updating for the new edit counter (so mine would be [8] instead of [9], for example) Thanks. :) -- AmaryllisGardener talk 21:08, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The xtools link was wonky all last weekend and it now goes to a 404 message. Can we please switch back to the old edit counter (I just checked and though it takes about a minute to load it is still working) - at least until the xtools one is working again? If not no worries and thanks for your time. MarnetteD| Talk 03:43, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Site has been moved, requesting links be updated. DragonZero ( Talk · Contribs) 11:27, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
xtools is down again.
{{ User contrib SUL}} uses this link: Special:CentralAuth. See:
49,000+ |
This is the link in that template:
It has separate numbers for many Wikimedia projects, and for Wikipedias in many languages. -- Timeshifter ( talk) 14:03, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
{{
edit template-protected}}
template. xTools seems to be working to me. The only time there has been any outages that I'm aware of (as an xTools maintainer) in the recent past have been due to Labs restarts and maintenance and outages. If you see xTools down, I encourage you to wait 15 minutes and try again (there is an automatic restarting tool for when things go wrong that checks every 15 minutes) and if it's still not working ping the tool maintainers. We all have talk pages and I believe we all have email available. — {{U|
Technical 13}} (
e •
t •
c)
01:52, 12 March 2015 (UTC)Whole server is non-responsive as of this moment. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 06:33, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
I'm not sure if I got this right: do you really have to manually fill in the edit-counts yourself? Or is there some bot already doing that automatically?
The
userpages on mobile already feature automatic edit-counts, so why isn't there a way to have these on the usual pages?
Or should I ask about this at
Wikipedia:Village pump?
--
Fixuture (
talk)
20:34, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Many of the colours used in this template are not compliant with WP:COLOR – that is, they do not meet the WCAG 2 AAA Compliancy level. I've taken the chance to modify the colours myself in my sandbox: these are the colours before modification, and these are the colours after modification – the colours (text and background) that have been changed are displayed in bold in the former link. I recommend that these be updated as soon as possible, to comply with policy. Alex| The| Whovian 17:33, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
I've taken the chance to modify the colours myself in my sandbox. Alex| The| Whovian 15:06, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Revisiting this, this has now been done in the sandbox, and can now be updated in the live version. Test cases are available in the specific subpage - the revised versions are on the left, whereas the original/current version is on the right. Alex| The| Whovian 13:49, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The template supports the additions of deleted contributions, distinct pages, images, etc. Per the sandbox, I've added automated contributions (e.g. Twinkle, AWB, etc). Example in test cases, code in sandbox ready to deploy. Alex|The|Whovian ? 03:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi all,
I'm sorry if I was being a little dim here, but is there any way to auto update the amounts recorded for this infobox? We have Special:Contributions, which gives a numerical amount on the list, is there a way to import this into the infobox, so that it doesn't need to be updated manually? It seems a little odd that we have the ability to see the amount, but no way to make this value appear in the infobox.
Of course, I could have simply missed it. Please let me know if this is/isn't possible. Many Thanks Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 11:00, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
#!/usr/bin/env python3
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
#
#/*
#* Copyright (C) 2019 Jimmy Olano (http://www.ks7000.net.ve/)
#*
#* This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
#* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
#* the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
#* https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html any later version.
#* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
#* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
#* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
#* GNU General Public License for more details.
#*
#* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
#* along with this program. If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
#*
#* Special thanks to Kenneth Reitz for created "Requests" <http for humans>
#* https://requests.kennethreitz.org/en/master/dev/authors/
#*/
import requests
from bs4 import BeautifulSoup
user = "Jimmy_Olano"
url = "https://xtools.wmflabs.org/ec/en.wikipedia.org/"+user
my_headers = {'User-Agent': 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_10_1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/39.0.2171.95 Safari/537.36'}
try:
page = requests.get(url, headers=my_headers)
if page.status_code == "200":
wiki_soup = BeautifulSoup(page.text, 'html.parser')
count_edits = wiki_soup.find_all(class_="xt-test--total-edits")[0].get_text()
print(_("User "+user+" has "+count_edits+" editions."))
except:
print(_("No connection with wmflabs!"));
As more people break the 100,000 edits mark, any objection to adding a few more color patterns? I'm happy to do it... -- Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 18:45, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
So I've decided to redo this template and make use of a module to do some much better calculations. This is in the VERY early stages and I would welcome any and all input! My thinking is that rather than having seemingly random colors, lets actually do things in a progressive way. He is my current plan of attack:
Right now this is just food for thought. I'm still playing with how to do it, but would welcome any ideas!
-- Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 19:13, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
This template is now generating errors on hundreds of user pages, judging from the latest additions to Category:Pages with script errors. Please restore the previous non-module version to fix the errors until the errors are fixed. JohnBlackburne words deeds 23:20, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Old:
1+ |
New:
1+ |
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
100,000+ |
Not sure if anyone's aware but the 100000 userbox above has been changed from black background/yellow text to yellow background/black text which looks rather odd, Wasn't sure if this should be changed back ?, Thanks –
Davey2010
Talk
17:58, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
@
Zackmann08: did you recently remove the logs=yes
parameter? If so will you be restoring this? —
xaosflux
Talk
15:17, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
I'm trying to use the instructions on the template page to change the colors of the template on my user page, using the id-bg, info-bg, border, id-font, and info-font parameters, but it doesn't seem to be working. What am I doing wrong?
45,000+ |
—
Mudwater (
Talk)
13:07, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
This user has autoconfirmed rights on the English Wikipedia. ( verify) |
@ Mudwater: so this is all based off of {{ Userbox}} so that's where you will find the documentation and just a reminder you can always create your own custom box. But let me see if I can't do it for ya...
45,000+ |
Hope that helps. --
Zackmann (
Talk to me/
What I been doing)
18:54, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Where have all the colours gone? In the past, the colours of this userbox varied according to the value fed in, and this is described at Template:User contrib#Color reference (expand the box). Now it's always two shades of grey, whatever the value. -- Redrose64 🌹 ( talk) 18:42, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
For anyone who wants to see the colors used for separate edit count templates for reference, click here. The template has been archived in the Wayback Machine. CHICHI7YT ( talk) 19:58, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Module:User contrib has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please merge
Module:User contrib/sandbox into
Module:User contrib, and
Template:User contrib/doc/sandbox into
Template:User contrib/doc. They are both identical, apart from the |reverted=
parameter, which I added, to show deleted edits instead of just edits to deleted pages.
WT79 (
Speak to me |
account info) 06:50, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
The sandbox also re-adds the |link=
parameter, which was lost during conversion to lua.
WT79 (
Speak to me |
account info)
07:32, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
deleted=
parameter.
WT79 (
Speak to me |
account info)
06:46, 22 June 2020 (UTC)|link=
parameter to sandbox so have temporally closed this request.
WT79 (
Speak to me |
account info)
07:01, 22 June 2020 (UTC)|deleted=
, |reverted=
, |articles=
, and |automated=
parameters, and a similar issue is present if the |distinct=
and |unique=
parameters are used together.
WT79 (
Speak to me |
account info)
07:30, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
The link=
parameter appears to be broken. This can be seen in the examples in doc. Does anyone know what is causing this issue, and how to fix?
WT79 (
Speak to me |
account info)
14:16, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
|link=
has been lost during
template's conversion into a Lua module.
Module:User contrib simply doesn't support it. —
andrybak (
talk)
23:08, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
|link=
, it looks like the conversion to use a Lua module was never tested thoroughly and was never finished. It may be best to revert to the previous non-Lua version. –
Jonesey95 (
talk)
01:45, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Module:User contrib has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please merge
Module:User contrib/sandbox into
Module:User contrib. It should be identical to the current version apart from that it re-adds the |link=
parameter (with alias |url=
), which was lost when the template was converted to lua.
WT79 (
Speak to me |
account info)
09:46, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Instead of me manually changing over time. Can we make a userbox that detects your contributions? -- MirahezeGuy ( talk) 15:38, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
269,000+ |
{{
adminstats}}
, for example {{
adminstats|Redrose64|style=raw ed+del}}
emits 269813 which I can then use thus: {{User contrib|{{rounddown|{{adminstats|Redrose64|style=raw ed+del}}|-3}}|Redrose64}}
, see right. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
21:04, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
I have opened a phab ticket requesting a magic word that would allow this template to be updated automatically. See phab:T278506. {{u| Sdkb}} talk 02:57, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Unless I am misunderstanding the documentation, it appears that |linked=no
does not work. I also tried blank |link=
and blank |url=
, but in each case, the link in the body of the userbox is generated. Please see
this testcase.
My goal is to provide an option for editors who have added a wikilink to the edit count, as in the second testcase. I think this used to work fine, but now it creates a "wikilink inside external link" Linter error. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:34, 8 May 2024 (UTC)