Submission declined on 22 November 2023 by
Theroadislong (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 22 November 2023 by
WikiOriginal-9 (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
WikiOriginal-9 8 months ago. |
Submission declined on 17 November 2023 by
WikiOriginal-9 (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
WikiOriginal-9 8 months ago. |
Submission declined on 14 November 2023 by
WikiOriginal-9 (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
WikiOriginal-9 8 months ago. |
Submission declined on 14 November 2023 by
Timtrent (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. "with the public[19][20][21][22][23][24]." is a prime example of
WP:CITEKILL. Instead we need one excellent reference per fact asserted. If you are sure it is beneficial, two, and at an absolute maximum, three. A fact you assert, once verified in a reliable source, is verified. More is gilding the lily. Please choose the very best in each case of multiple referencing for a single point and either drop or repurpose the remainder
Declined by
Timtrent 8 months ago.. "Matti has two papers and a profile listed on Google Scholar[28][29][30]. " Google Scholar is a specialised search engine. Unsuitable as a reference It all contributes to the WP:BOMBARD present all through this draft. Thin the references out. No reviewer is going check them all, so your referencing militates against a useful review. I get that you are keen on this being accepted. To achieve this you need a dramatic set of cuts. Cut text that adds no value, cut references that add no value. |
Submission declined on 5 November 2023 by
LEvalyn (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
LEvalyn 8 months ago. |
Submission declined on 8 October 2023 by
Johannes Maximilian (
talk). This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources. Please check your references and remove the external links from the body. Declined by
Johannes Maximilian 9 months ago. |
Submission declined on 3 October 2023 by
Hey man im josh (
talk). This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the
sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you. Declined by
Hey man im josh 9 months ago. |
Submission declined on 2 October 2023 by
Jamiebuba (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
Jamiebuba 9 months ago. |
Submission declined on 2 August 2023 by
Theroadislong (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
Theroadislong 11 months ago. |
Matti Charlton | |
---|---|
Born | |
Other names | Madison Matti Charlton |
Occupations |
|
Musical career | |
Genres |
|
Instruments |
|
Labels | |
Website |
matticharlton |
Madison Matti Charlton (born July 6, 1980), known professionally as Matti Charlton, is a Canadian music producer, publisher and author.[ citation needed] They identify as transgender and are politically active in 2SLGBTQIA+ rights demonstrations in Toronto.[ citation needed]
In 1997, they released their first poetry chapbook, "the burning of lake simcoe." [1]
Charlton brought social changes to the culture of the University of Toronto's Engineering Student Union (SKULE). [2]
Charlton was the creative director of The Telephasic Workshop, an art studio on Yonge street which had 3D printing services early in the market at the time. [3]
Charlton was interviewed by the Telemundo Costa Central news channel in Santa Barbara, California during the Earth Day festival in 2024. [4]
Review of Matthew Charlton's poetry chapbook The Burning of Lake Simcoe.
Submission declined on 22 November 2023 by
Theroadislong (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 22 November 2023 by
WikiOriginal-9 (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
WikiOriginal-9 8 months ago. |
Submission declined on 17 November 2023 by
WikiOriginal-9 (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
WikiOriginal-9 8 months ago. |
Submission declined on 14 November 2023 by
WikiOriginal-9 (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
WikiOriginal-9 8 months ago. |
Submission declined on 14 November 2023 by
Timtrent (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. "with the public[19][20][21][22][23][24]." is a prime example of
WP:CITEKILL. Instead we need one excellent reference per fact asserted. If you are sure it is beneficial, two, and at an absolute maximum, three. A fact you assert, once verified in a reliable source, is verified. More is gilding the lily. Please choose the very best in each case of multiple referencing for a single point and either drop or repurpose the remainder
Declined by
Timtrent 8 months ago.. "Matti has two papers and a profile listed on Google Scholar[28][29][30]. " Google Scholar is a specialised search engine. Unsuitable as a reference It all contributes to the WP:BOMBARD present all through this draft. Thin the references out. No reviewer is going check them all, so your referencing militates against a useful review. I get that you are keen on this being accepted. To achieve this you need a dramatic set of cuts. Cut text that adds no value, cut references that add no value. |
Submission declined on 5 November 2023 by
LEvalyn (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
LEvalyn 8 months ago. |
Submission declined on 8 October 2023 by
Johannes Maximilian (
talk). This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources. Please check your references and remove the external links from the body. Declined by
Johannes Maximilian 9 months ago. |
Submission declined on 3 October 2023 by
Hey man im josh (
talk). This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the
sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you. Declined by
Hey man im josh 9 months ago. |
Submission declined on 2 October 2023 by
Jamiebuba (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
Jamiebuba 9 months ago. |
Submission declined on 2 August 2023 by
Theroadislong (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
Theroadislong 11 months ago. |
Matti Charlton | |
---|---|
Born | |
Other names | Madison Matti Charlton |
Occupations |
|
Musical career | |
Genres |
|
Instruments |
|
Labels | |
Website |
matticharlton |
Madison Matti Charlton (born July 6, 1980), known professionally as Matti Charlton, is a Canadian music producer, publisher and author.[ citation needed] They identify as transgender and are politically active in 2SLGBTQIA+ rights demonstrations in Toronto.[ citation needed]
In 1997, they released their first poetry chapbook, "the burning of lake simcoe." [1]
Charlton brought social changes to the culture of the University of Toronto's Engineering Student Union (SKULE). [2]
Charlton was the creative director of The Telephasic Workshop, an art studio on Yonge street which had 3D printing services early in the market at the time. [3]
Charlton was interviewed by the Telemundo Costa Central news channel in Santa Barbara, California during the Earth Day festival in 2024. [4]
Review of Matthew Charlton's poetry chapbook The Burning of Lake Simcoe.