Psychology Project‑class

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles Project This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Women Project‑class

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles Project This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Women scientists Project‑class

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles Project This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This page was moved from the Wikipedia:Year_of_Science/Women_in_psychology in order to place this onto the main WikiProject domain. The Year of Science is scheduled to be inactive at the end of 2016. In order to preserve the work done and continue to add more pages for female psychologists, we have created this page here. This project will be promoted through in class assignments at the College of Staten Island, where undergraduate students will be instructed to research female psychologists, and create and contribute to their articles. Celizas ( talk)

		Welcome to Women in Red's April 2017 worldwide online editathon. Participation is welcome in any language.
		"Women in psychology" Biographies, writings, achievements, organizations

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

-- Ipigott ( talk) 11:14, 25 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Would it be useful to merge in some of the content of User:WebMaven2000/WikiProject_Women_of_psychology? It seems to include some useful links and info. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo) ^talk 20:04, 10 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Do members feel this project might be better as a task force for either WikiProject Women or WikiProject Women in Science? I don't feel strongly either way, but wonder if the consolidation makes sense. --- Another Believer _{( Talk)} 20:21, 18 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{ WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{ WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{ WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 ( talk) 22:36, 13 April 2023 (UTC) reply