Essays Low‑impact | ||||||||||
|
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Navel-gazing page. |
|
Created page on Navel-gazing within Wikipedia deletion debates. = started with fifty (50) cited Case study examples.
— Cirt ( talk) 19:47, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Definition of term itself incorporated example text from entry navel-gazing, with improved sources as in-line citations. — Cirt ( talk) 19:48, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
So far have fifty (50) cited examples in the Case study section, status ongoing is:
through so far with Results 121 - 140 of 445
Next to do = go through next set starting at result number 141.
— Cirt ( talk) 19:50, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
I would recommend that we add advice that if "navel gazing" has been introduced in an XFD as the topic deals with Wikipedia, that !voters should be guiding by judging the article as if there was no connection to Wikipedia - this is equally applicable to keep and delete !votes. Basically, just as navel-gazing is a bad argument to raise, similarly just because a topic deals with Wikipedia doesn't mean it is more important than an equivalent topic that has zero to do with Wikipedia. -- MASEM ( t) 20:28, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Should the history and discussion behind the mainspace article on The Wikipedia Adventure be included in the table? —Largo Plazo ( talk) 20:53, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
My thanks to Masem and Tony1 for the helpful additions and copy editing.
Much appreciated,
— Cirt ( talk) 01:58, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
thank you. Moscowamerican ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:44, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Essays Low‑impact | ||||||||||
|
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Navel-gazing page. |
|
Created page on Navel-gazing within Wikipedia deletion debates. = started with fifty (50) cited Case study examples.
— Cirt ( talk) 19:47, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Definition of term itself incorporated example text from entry navel-gazing, with improved sources as in-line citations. — Cirt ( talk) 19:48, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
So far have fifty (50) cited examples in the Case study section, status ongoing is:
through so far with Results 121 - 140 of 445
Next to do = go through next set starting at result number 141.
— Cirt ( talk) 19:50, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
I would recommend that we add advice that if "navel gazing" has been introduced in an XFD as the topic deals with Wikipedia, that !voters should be guiding by judging the article as if there was no connection to Wikipedia - this is equally applicable to keep and delete !votes. Basically, just as navel-gazing is a bad argument to raise, similarly just because a topic deals with Wikipedia doesn't mean it is more important than an equivalent topic that has zero to do with Wikipedia. -- MASEM ( t) 20:28, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Should the history and discussion behind the mainspace article on The Wikipedia Adventure be included in the table? —Largo Plazo ( talk) 20:53, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
My thanks to Masem and Tony1 for the helpful additions and copy editing.
Much appreciated,
— Cirt ( talk) 01:58, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
thank you. Moscowamerican ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:44, 17 April 2016 (UTC)