![]() |
Essays Mid‑impact ![]() | |||||||||
|
![]() | Department of Fun Project‑class Bottom‑importance | |||||||||
|
Would this make more sense in alphabetical order? — iride scent 19:15, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Casliber sorted the list, but now there are several unsorted entries, starting at Cool Down Blocks. Not sure if they're intentionally unsorted? dorftrottel ( talk) 16:02, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
A place to send an article created by an editor that you don't like.
OK, I've read the Brigg railway station article and seen the rusty iron bridge pic; now I'm so depressed I've lost the desire to live!
Whoopee, three trains in each direction no less, I can hardly contain my excitement! I imagine the "Kid in Africa" would think all his Christmases had come at once if the bridge was given a coat of paint and an extra train was put on every other Sunday. Ah well, off to write my will now, giving Iridescent a special mention. Cheers. -- Red Sunset 21:39, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Although the National Rail Enquiries' station facilities site states that the station is closed Monday–Sunday (sic. – which means it's permanently closed!), you will all be relieved to know that despite there not being a nearby bus service, taxi rank, car or cycle hire facility, the car park is open 24 hours a day Monday–Friday. Therefore, should you find yourself in the unfortunate position of needing to catch a train on the only day that they pass through Brigg, namely Saturday, you will find the car park closed! You couldn't make this stuff up! -- Red Sunset 22:41, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
←Malleus, please - A215 road at least has some interesting facts on it. My personal champions at the moment are Pate Hole and The Mall Wood Green (which I very nearly managed to slip through the GA hoop, too). If anyone wants to join Risker and my long-term ambition to get Hypnodog onto the main page, do feel free. — iride scent 00:19, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Incidentally, all you people who are deriding Brigg railway station for only having three trains a week need to have a look at Manchester's greatest contributions to the rail network, Reddish South railway station and Denton railway station - served by a mighty one train a week in one direction only, which a week later comes back the other way, and the mighty Watford West railway station ("temporarily closed for repairs" since 1996). — iride scent 00:19, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Everyone's second-favourite BADSITE now includes a link here; expect some of the more dubious characters from Wikipedia's history to start "improving" this page.
Malleus, just to remind you that, while it can't be done until the page has been subject to "vandalism or disruption", a user page can be indefinitely semi-protected at the request of the page's owner... — iride scent 23:07, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Fantastic, Malleus (& other contributors), I've spent half the evening chuckling at these. It's the closest thing to an 'insider's guide' I've seen yet ;) EyeSerene talk 20:13, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The Destroyer of the Wiki Barnstar | |
Is hereby granted to Malleus for his sterling efforts. And for his battle against the scourge that is the em-dash. Apparently. — iride scent 21:02, 6 June 2008 (UTC) |
My bad, I thought this was a serious encyclopedia page run by FAC reviewers. Am I going to be sent to ArbCom by administrators now? giggy ( :O) 10:27, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Can anyone think of what whoever uploaded this image was actually trying to illustrate? I can't imagine we ever had an article on How to answer the telephone whilst tied up with a tow-rope and wearing a very unflattering bikini. Huge bonus points, barnstars, whatever you want to anyone who manages to work this image into a genuine article. — iride scent 21:54, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Further captions:
DDStretch (talk) 14:17, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
EyeSerene talk 16:12, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
-- Red Sunset 11:49, 8 June 2008 (UTC) Why's everyone picking on Angela all of a sudden. · AndonicO Engage. 15:59, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
-- Red Sunset 18:04, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
-- Red Sunset 17:58, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
I guess even an old Yank like myself can learn something new every day... Never heard that one. By the way, I abhor the deterioration of perfectly good old U.S. slang words, like geek and twerp, both of which have lost all their bite in recent decades to become synonyms of nerd. We've even got a home-computer-repair company that drives around in vans labeled, "Geek Squad". My 9-year-old asked me what that was for. I told him probably if you had chickens running around your yard, and you needed someone to come and bite their heads off, you called those guys. To his credit-- and to the evidence that his old man is a generation older than the parents of his friends-- he understood the reference... And "twerp"? You don't even want to know what the really meant... Dekkappai ( talk) 18:49, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
←I always liked planes - I even made a special trip to Heathrow to see the last three Concordes land. Don't write on them though, as there are too many people here who know more than I ever will. One of the more surreal interludes in the whole "Lara is a Nazi" flamewar last month was someone who came to my talkpage to flame me and ended up discussing the aesthetic value of nuclear tests and the Vulcan bomber. – iride scent 22:12, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
I can't find any appropriate place to insert it (if anyone can, do feel free) but I think the fact that this was a featured article less than four years ago needs to be shared. Depending on your point of view, it either shows how far we've come since then, or how low we slipped.
If anyone gets this back to FA status again, you'll win a special barnstar including this piece of Commons's finest. – iride scent 22:08, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
As as response to the original post, I think that the fact that this was a featured article is even scarier. Nousernamesleft copper, not wood 18:55, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
I've been waiting for months to pass this along to the right person on the right occasion. Maralia pointed me to this Wicktionary several days ago, and it made me laugh out loud several times, notably the entry for "Userbox". I was reminded of it while visiting your userpage during the recent GA review. I thought it prudent to wait until after the review was completed to prevent any untoward suggestion that we might be in kahootz. The barnstar for GA pass scandal might not be something Wikipedia could recover from. It's such a gentle thing. -- Moni3 ( talk) 00:46, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the barnstar, but I thought we had a deal? You're not trying to weasel out of it are you?</joke> -- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 01:25, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
I appreciate this has nothing whatsoever to do with this page, but I had to share this with someone. It's so refreshing to see that WP addresses the burning issues of the day. – iride scent 19:54, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
[1]The iorny...-- Koji † Dude (C) 03:14, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
I don't know who wrote the entry on wikimarkup (been too lazy to check), but whoever it was has my deepest respect. (Try to edit it to see what I mean.) -- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 19:04, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
I decided to be bold and added an interwiki with an user page using the same humor. Barraki ( talk) 17:26, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
I just made the inordinate mistake of following that bondage image to its uploader's gallery... at work. *sigh* Qb | your 2 cents 17:23, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
This is absolutely hilarious. I wish I'd known about it earlier. Truly brilliant. ~Jennavecia (Talk) 04:21, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
The page is fairly well-fleshed out and refined now, any thoughts of moving it into the project space? – xeno ( talk) 19:57, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Hey! Where do I go to complain about abuse of admin power?</joke> -- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 20:39, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Koji just made my funnies page. That's where I sstore diffs of vandals, and other fuckwittery, in order to tank future Requestss. (it may be a redlink, but it's watchlisted now....the cobra waits quietly in the grass....) Keeper ǀ 76 20:52, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
To the writers before the move. Its a very enjoyable read. Syn ergy 21:16, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Actually, I think rollback can be added to ones tools on request, without having to be an administrator. It is misleading to indicate that Twinkle is the only way to use rollback without being an administrator. Anyway, as far as I know, Twinkle does not use rollback, but something else that has some rolling back functionality. Snowman ( talk) 21:27, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
A recent tweak has resulted in the addition of an entry for the infamous [citation needed] tag. It's fun, but there is also a fun entry under {{fact}}. (I wonder how one could think that with all this stuff here the template would not be covered. :-D) Should I just merge the two entries?
Until someone replies, I'll try to catch up with the Moscow Debates. (sigh) Waltham, The Duke of 22:33, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Some redundancy with Wikipedia:Glossary? --—— Gadget850 (Ed) talk - 16:49, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
As this list is a glossary, Wikipedia:Manual of Style (glossaries) would apply. It is still a proposal, but it does have guidelines for list formatting. --—— Gadget850 (Ed) talk - 17:04, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Noticed the MfD. Enigma message 06:26, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
This article contains a spaced em dash. It is about to be deleted. Tony (talk) 03:23, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
Ever thought about adding an entry about the word Regards...?
Often appears at the end of a veiled threat from an admin, notification you're article is about to be deleted or just when someone's "constructively" calling you a plain fucknut.
On a serious note though, it's quite provocative, thus being the exact opposite of the apparent desired effect, which is often the actual desired effect, regards ;) Ryan4314 ( talk) 18:19, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Has everything you want, including horrible spelling. Enigma msg 05:33, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
The dictionary would be well-served if someone of superior wit and insight to me were to chronicle the (fading?) phenomenon of the guestbook and all it represents. Skomorokh 06:49, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
I wonder whether there would be any objections to adding an anchor to every entry. I know it would add some clutter to the code (not very good for editing), and that most of them might not be used in the end, but I do not find the current section-links system satisfactory. We might, of course, only add a few anchors to serve the most popular entries, but that would be rather uneven a treatment, and leave us with most of the disadvantages of both situations and few of the benefits of either. Waltham, The Duke of 20:10, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Last call for input. If there are no objections, I'll finish the job as soon as I have time. Waltham, The Duke of 05:59, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Very enjoyable. I think a definition for "Dick" would be a good addition. -- Dweller ( talk) 12:13, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
I'm from Ukraine.I can speak English so-so. I can read better than speak. There are many inaccuracies in the article about Buchach. Your programme cancelled trooth changes. The article about Buchach have a little historical information and some lie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.94.167.106 ( talk) 09:36, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
I make the effort swing by to read this every now and then. Always enjoyable and grounding. Manning ( talk) 06:04, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
It took me a while to discover this page, and for your wonderful efforts Malleus, I salute you. I have some further observations for all y'all:
Hillbillyholiday talk 13:53, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, I mean: *applause*. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:01, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Double sharp ( talk) 04:55, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
And also:
Naturally, I have not yet come up with definitions for any of them, and perhaps this sort of action (suggesting improvements that are so non-specific that they are hard to act on) should also receive a definition. (Although, come to think of it, I can't think of a short phrase to describe it at the moment.) Double sharp ( talk) 04:58, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
OK I've done some more. Any suggestions or other comments? If not I guess I'll add them. -- Mrjulesd (talk) 14:22, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
{{{t|{{#ifeq:{{{v|}}}|1|{{{1|}}}|{{{2|}}}}}
does have meaning, isn't it nice?-- Mrjulesd (talk) 14:22, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Re: Wikipedia:WikiSpeak#Cabal,
There Is No Cabal (TINC). We discussed this at the last cabal meeting, and everyone agreed that there is no cabal. An announcement was made in Cabalist: The Official Newsletter of The Cabal making it clear that there is no cabal. The words "There Is No Cabal" are in ten-foot letters on the side of the international cabal headquarters, and we the announcement that there is no cabal is shown at the start of every program on the Cabal Network. If that's doesn't convince people that there is no cabal, I don't know what will. -- Guy Macon ( talk) 23:05, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
I have a picture, can anyone think of a suitable description / caption? -- Hillbillyholiday talk 10:54, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Similar to above, any ideas for this? It seems appropriate for "copyedit", "start class article" or the average WP page. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:53, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Like either would be OK I think with a good caption. I have added one possible one.
--Jules
(Mrjulesd)
12:54, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
Admittedly this might suggest either a cursory look at Chomsky or an irresistible urge to quote Monty Python out of context and turn it into a bunch of simple catchphrases. Double sharp ( talk) 07:38, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Given the large scale of that category at WP:LEW, it strikes me that perhaps we need a definition for "nationality". Double sharp ( talk) 15:36, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Essays Mid‑impact ![]() | |||||||||
|
![]() | Department of Fun Project‑class Bottom‑importance | |||||||||
|
Would this make more sense in alphabetical order? — iride scent 19:15, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Casliber sorted the list, but now there are several unsorted entries, starting at Cool Down Blocks. Not sure if they're intentionally unsorted? dorftrottel ( talk) 16:02, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
A place to send an article created by an editor that you don't like.
OK, I've read the Brigg railway station article and seen the rusty iron bridge pic; now I'm so depressed I've lost the desire to live!
Whoopee, three trains in each direction no less, I can hardly contain my excitement! I imagine the "Kid in Africa" would think all his Christmases had come at once if the bridge was given a coat of paint and an extra train was put on every other Sunday. Ah well, off to write my will now, giving Iridescent a special mention. Cheers. -- Red Sunset 21:39, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Although the National Rail Enquiries' station facilities site states that the station is closed Monday–Sunday (sic. – which means it's permanently closed!), you will all be relieved to know that despite there not being a nearby bus service, taxi rank, car or cycle hire facility, the car park is open 24 hours a day Monday–Friday. Therefore, should you find yourself in the unfortunate position of needing to catch a train on the only day that they pass through Brigg, namely Saturday, you will find the car park closed! You couldn't make this stuff up! -- Red Sunset 22:41, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
←Malleus, please - A215 road at least has some interesting facts on it. My personal champions at the moment are Pate Hole and The Mall Wood Green (which I very nearly managed to slip through the GA hoop, too). If anyone wants to join Risker and my long-term ambition to get Hypnodog onto the main page, do feel free. — iride scent 00:19, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Incidentally, all you people who are deriding Brigg railway station for only having three trains a week need to have a look at Manchester's greatest contributions to the rail network, Reddish South railway station and Denton railway station - served by a mighty one train a week in one direction only, which a week later comes back the other way, and the mighty Watford West railway station ("temporarily closed for repairs" since 1996). — iride scent 00:19, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Everyone's second-favourite BADSITE now includes a link here; expect some of the more dubious characters from Wikipedia's history to start "improving" this page.
Malleus, just to remind you that, while it can't be done until the page has been subject to "vandalism or disruption", a user page can be indefinitely semi-protected at the request of the page's owner... — iride scent 23:07, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Fantastic, Malleus (& other contributors), I've spent half the evening chuckling at these. It's the closest thing to an 'insider's guide' I've seen yet ;) EyeSerene talk 20:13, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The Destroyer of the Wiki Barnstar | |
Is hereby granted to Malleus for his sterling efforts. And for his battle against the scourge that is the em-dash. Apparently. — iride scent 21:02, 6 June 2008 (UTC) |
My bad, I thought this was a serious encyclopedia page run by FAC reviewers. Am I going to be sent to ArbCom by administrators now? giggy ( :O) 10:27, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Can anyone think of what whoever uploaded this image was actually trying to illustrate? I can't imagine we ever had an article on How to answer the telephone whilst tied up with a tow-rope and wearing a very unflattering bikini. Huge bonus points, barnstars, whatever you want to anyone who manages to work this image into a genuine article. — iride scent 21:54, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Further captions:
DDStretch (talk) 14:17, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
EyeSerene talk 16:12, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
-- Red Sunset 11:49, 8 June 2008 (UTC) Why's everyone picking on Angela all of a sudden. · AndonicO Engage. 15:59, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
-- Red Sunset 18:04, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
-- Red Sunset 17:58, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
I guess even an old Yank like myself can learn something new every day... Never heard that one. By the way, I abhor the deterioration of perfectly good old U.S. slang words, like geek and twerp, both of which have lost all their bite in recent decades to become synonyms of nerd. We've even got a home-computer-repair company that drives around in vans labeled, "Geek Squad". My 9-year-old asked me what that was for. I told him probably if you had chickens running around your yard, and you needed someone to come and bite their heads off, you called those guys. To his credit-- and to the evidence that his old man is a generation older than the parents of his friends-- he understood the reference... And "twerp"? You don't even want to know what the really meant... Dekkappai ( talk) 18:49, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
←I always liked planes - I even made a special trip to Heathrow to see the last three Concordes land. Don't write on them though, as there are too many people here who know more than I ever will. One of the more surreal interludes in the whole "Lara is a Nazi" flamewar last month was someone who came to my talkpage to flame me and ended up discussing the aesthetic value of nuclear tests and the Vulcan bomber. – iride scent 22:12, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
I can't find any appropriate place to insert it (if anyone can, do feel free) but I think the fact that this was a featured article less than four years ago needs to be shared. Depending on your point of view, it either shows how far we've come since then, or how low we slipped.
If anyone gets this back to FA status again, you'll win a special barnstar including this piece of Commons's finest. – iride scent 22:08, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
As as response to the original post, I think that the fact that this was a featured article is even scarier. Nousernamesleft copper, not wood 18:55, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
I've been waiting for months to pass this along to the right person on the right occasion. Maralia pointed me to this Wicktionary several days ago, and it made me laugh out loud several times, notably the entry for "Userbox". I was reminded of it while visiting your userpage during the recent GA review. I thought it prudent to wait until after the review was completed to prevent any untoward suggestion that we might be in kahootz. The barnstar for GA pass scandal might not be something Wikipedia could recover from. It's such a gentle thing. -- Moni3 ( talk) 00:46, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the barnstar, but I thought we had a deal? You're not trying to weasel out of it are you?</joke> -- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 01:25, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
I appreciate this has nothing whatsoever to do with this page, but I had to share this with someone. It's so refreshing to see that WP addresses the burning issues of the day. – iride scent 19:54, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
[1]The iorny...-- Koji † Dude (C) 03:14, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
I don't know who wrote the entry on wikimarkup (been too lazy to check), but whoever it was has my deepest respect. (Try to edit it to see what I mean.) -- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 19:04, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
I decided to be bold and added an interwiki with an user page using the same humor. Barraki ( talk) 17:26, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
I just made the inordinate mistake of following that bondage image to its uploader's gallery... at work. *sigh* Qb | your 2 cents 17:23, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
This is absolutely hilarious. I wish I'd known about it earlier. Truly brilliant. ~Jennavecia (Talk) 04:21, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
The page is fairly well-fleshed out and refined now, any thoughts of moving it into the project space? – xeno ( talk) 19:57, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Hey! Where do I go to complain about abuse of admin power?</joke> -- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 20:39, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Koji just made my funnies page. That's where I sstore diffs of vandals, and other fuckwittery, in order to tank future Requestss. (it may be a redlink, but it's watchlisted now....the cobra waits quietly in the grass....) Keeper ǀ 76 20:52, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
To the writers before the move. Its a very enjoyable read. Syn ergy 21:16, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Actually, I think rollback can be added to ones tools on request, without having to be an administrator. It is misleading to indicate that Twinkle is the only way to use rollback without being an administrator. Anyway, as far as I know, Twinkle does not use rollback, but something else that has some rolling back functionality. Snowman ( talk) 21:27, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
A recent tweak has resulted in the addition of an entry for the infamous [citation needed] tag. It's fun, but there is also a fun entry under {{fact}}. (I wonder how one could think that with all this stuff here the template would not be covered. :-D) Should I just merge the two entries?
Until someone replies, I'll try to catch up with the Moscow Debates. (sigh) Waltham, The Duke of 22:33, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Some redundancy with Wikipedia:Glossary? --—— Gadget850 (Ed) talk - 16:49, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
As this list is a glossary, Wikipedia:Manual of Style (glossaries) would apply. It is still a proposal, but it does have guidelines for list formatting. --—— Gadget850 (Ed) talk - 17:04, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Noticed the MfD. Enigma message 06:26, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
This article contains a spaced em dash. It is about to be deleted. Tony (talk) 03:23, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
Ever thought about adding an entry about the word Regards...?
Often appears at the end of a veiled threat from an admin, notification you're article is about to be deleted or just when someone's "constructively" calling you a plain fucknut.
On a serious note though, it's quite provocative, thus being the exact opposite of the apparent desired effect, which is often the actual desired effect, regards ;) Ryan4314 ( talk) 18:19, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Has everything you want, including horrible spelling. Enigma msg 05:33, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
The dictionary would be well-served if someone of superior wit and insight to me were to chronicle the (fading?) phenomenon of the guestbook and all it represents. Skomorokh 06:49, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
I wonder whether there would be any objections to adding an anchor to every entry. I know it would add some clutter to the code (not very good for editing), and that most of them might not be used in the end, but I do not find the current section-links system satisfactory. We might, of course, only add a few anchors to serve the most popular entries, but that would be rather uneven a treatment, and leave us with most of the disadvantages of both situations and few of the benefits of either. Waltham, The Duke of 20:10, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Last call for input. If there are no objections, I'll finish the job as soon as I have time. Waltham, The Duke of 05:59, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Very enjoyable. I think a definition for "Dick" would be a good addition. -- Dweller ( talk) 12:13, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
I'm from Ukraine.I can speak English so-so. I can read better than speak. There are many inaccuracies in the article about Buchach. Your programme cancelled trooth changes. The article about Buchach have a little historical information and some lie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.94.167.106 ( talk) 09:36, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
I make the effort swing by to read this every now and then. Always enjoyable and grounding. Manning ( talk) 06:04, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
It took me a while to discover this page, and for your wonderful efforts Malleus, I salute you. I have some further observations for all y'all:
Hillbillyholiday talk 13:53, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, I mean: *applause*. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:01, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Double sharp ( talk) 04:55, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
And also:
Naturally, I have not yet come up with definitions for any of them, and perhaps this sort of action (suggesting improvements that are so non-specific that they are hard to act on) should also receive a definition. (Although, come to think of it, I can't think of a short phrase to describe it at the moment.) Double sharp ( talk) 04:58, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
OK I've done some more. Any suggestions or other comments? If not I guess I'll add them. -- Mrjulesd (talk) 14:22, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
{{{t|{{#ifeq:{{{v|}}}|1|{{{1|}}}|{{{2|}}}}}
does have meaning, isn't it nice?-- Mrjulesd (talk) 14:22, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Re: Wikipedia:WikiSpeak#Cabal,
There Is No Cabal (TINC). We discussed this at the last cabal meeting, and everyone agreed that there is no cabal. An announcement was made in Cabalist: The Official Newsletter of The Cabal making it clear that there is no cabal. The words "There Is No Cabal" are in ten-foot letters on the side of the international cabal headquarters, and we the announcement that there is no cabal is shown at the start of every program on the Cabal Network. If that's doesn't convince people that there is no cabal, I don't know what will. -- Guy Macon ( talk) 23:05, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
I have a picture, can anyone think of a suitable description / caption? -- Hillbillyholiday talk 10:54, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Similar to above, any ideas for this? It seems appropriate for "copyedit", "start class article" or the average WP page. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:53, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Like either would be OK I think with a good caption. I have added one possible one.
--Jules
(Mrjulesd)
12:54, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
Admittedly this might suggest either a cursory look at Chomsky or an irresistible urge to quote Monty Python out of context and turn it into a bunch of simple catchphrases. Double sharp ( talk) 07:38, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Given the large scale of that category at WP:LEW, it strikes me that perhaps we need a definition for "nationality". Double sharp ( talk) 15:36, 29 February 2020 (UTC)