This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
I'm starting to notice a major increase of content and participants in this Task Force. I think it would be a good idea if we massively overhaul the project itself. For example:
This task force is continually growing, and we simply don't have the right resources (templates, fancruft/spam guides, etc.) to provide to the participants who edit RS pages. Other suggestions are welcome.-- Ed ¿Cómo estás? Reviews? 03:49, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
The overhaul is doing great! The overhaul may need an archive page to itself where we're heading! Greeves ( talk • contribs) 14:50, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Done
We now have consensus to move the page to it's new location.
Arguments brought up supporting the move were the title is currently too long, especially with the MMO and CVG project logos with the title and thus the logos were overlapping the title. Arguments brought up against the move were none. We may have not actually needed to find consensus as this move is uncontroversial but it's better than having arguments post-move. Greeves ( talk • contribs) 19:49, 27 January 2007 (UTC) |
I actually think I liked it better to have the page name as Wikipedia:WikiProject Massively multiplayer online games/RuneScape instead of Wikipedia:WikiProject Massively multiplayer online games/RuneScape Task Force. The latter is simply too long for the project page to adequately display the page name along with those two images at the top. Any ideas?-- Ed ¿Cómo estás? Reviews? 01:23, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Next order of business: subpages? I'm just raising up this suggestion since it was also mentioned in The Giant Puffins's comment. Basically, I think that the Participants, Templates, and Collaboration could get their own subpages. That way, editors can have more free space to write on rather than having some spacing restrictions on the main project page. I guess this can also tie in with a major redesign of the task force page as well. Perhaps we can have a link directory for all of the project's subpages, like the one on WP:ASUE.-- Ed ¿Cómo estás? Reviews? 22:09, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
BTW, WikiProject MMO has a sidebar that is placed on all of our pages (with a link to this task force). I doubt that this is possible, but would the bar be able to go on the main task force page. I understand if this is not possible with the task force organized in a portal-like fashion (which I have to say is unique compared to other projects on the English Wikipedia). Greeves ( talk • contribs) 23:18, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Done
Wow! This is the third comment that I am making at once! On all RuneScape talk pages there is a GIANT notice about cruft and such. It is a nice reminder due to the large amount of vandalism and cruft on those articles. However, it is horribly cluttering the talk pages. Would we be able to shorten it in any fashion?
Greeves (
talk •
contribs)
23:18, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Done
Hi everyone! For the member list I am wondering if we could merge it with the main one as people should be joining
WP:MMO first and then optionally joining the task force(s). I have been copying and pasting names from your member list here and also adding a ref saying also part of the RS task force. I am thinking, we could simply use the one list and use the refs. What do you all think?
Greeves (
talk •
contribs •
reviews)
14:55, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Done! Greeves ( talk • contribs • reviews) 19:57, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Done
I would really like to revive our overhaul that we started earlier on. I think that it would be a good idea if we blend our collaboration with that of the MMOG WikiProject. We have a scarce amount of articles; until we have a larger number of reasonable and policy-abiding articles, the current collaboration is ineffective.--
Ed
¿Cómo estás?
01:53, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
It seems like not much people are participating in discussions both on this project and all RuneScape subpage talk pages. I think that we need to encourage more participation in this project. Any ideas?-- Ed ¿Cómo estás? 16:24, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
I'm starting to notice a major increase of content and participants in this Task Force. I think it would be a good idea if we massively overhaul the project itself. For example:
This task force is continually growing, and we simply don't have the right resources (templates, fancruft/spam guides, etc.) to provide to the participants who edit RS pages. Other suggestions are welcome.-- Ed ¿Cómo estás? Reviews? 03:49, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
The overhaul is doing great! The overhaul may need an archive page to itself where we're heading! Greeves ( talk • contribs) 14:50, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Done
We now have consensus to move the page to it's new location.
Arguments brought up supporting the move were the title is currently too long, especially with the MMO and CVG project logos with the title and thus the logos were overlapping the title. Arguments brought up against the move were none. We may have not actually needed to find consensus as this move is uncontroversial but it's better than having arguments post-move. Greeves ( talk • contribs) 19:49, 27 January 2007 (UTC) |
I actually think I liked it better to have the page name as Wikipedia:WikiProject Massively multiplayer online games/RuneScape instead of Wikipedia:WikiProject Massively multiplayer online games/RuneScape Task Force. The latter is simply too long for the project page to adequately display the page name along with those two images at the top. Any ideas?-- Ed ¿Cómo estás? Reviews? 01:23, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Next order of business: subpages? I'm just raising up this suggestion since it was also mentioned in The Giant Puffins's comment. Basically, I think that the Participants, Templates, and Collaboration could get their own subpages. That way, editors can have more free space to write on rather than having some spacing restrictions on the main project page. I guess this can also tie in with a major redesign of the task force page as well. Perhaps we can have a link directory for all of the project's subpages, like the one on WP:ASUE.-- Ed ¿Cómo estás? Reviews? 22:09, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
BTW, WikiProject MMO has a sidebar that is placed on all of our pages (with a link to this task force). I doubt that this is possible, but would the bar be able to go on the main task force page. I understand if this is not possible with the task force organized in a portal-like fashion (which I have to say is unique compared to other projects on the English Wikipedia). Greeves ( talk • contribs) 23:18, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Done
Wow! This is the third comment that I am making at once! On all RuneScape talk pages there is a GIANT notice about cruft and such. It is a nice reminder due to the large amount of vandalism and cruft on those articles. However, it is horribly cluttering the talk pages. Would we be able to shorten it in any fashion?
Greeves (
talk •
contribs)
23:18, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Done
Hi everyone! For the member list I am wondering if we could merge it with the main one as people should be joining
WP:MMO first and then optionally joining the task force(s). I have been copying and pasting names from your member list here and also adding a ref saying also part of the RS task force. I am thinking, we could simply use the one list and use the refs. What do you all think?
Greeves (
talk •
contribs •
reviews)
14:55, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Done! Greeves ( talk • contribs • reviews) 19:57, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Done
I would really like to revive our overhaul that we started earlier on. I think that it would be a good idea if we blend our collaboration with that of the MMOG WikiProject. We have a scarce amount of articles; until we have a larger number of reasonable and policy-abiding articles, the current collaboration is ineffective.--
Ed
¿Cómo estás?
01:53, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
It seems like not much people are participating in discussions both on this project and all RuneScape subpage talk pages. I think that we need to encourage more participation in this project. Any ideas?-- Ed ¿Cómo estás? 16:24, 2 March 2007 (UTC)