![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Sigh! In its infinite wisdom, the new Republican majority in the General Assembly has decided to dump the old http://www.legislature.state.tn.us/ URL and change everything over to http://www.capitol.tn.gov/ . Suffixes also have been changed from "htm" to "html". This means that many links in reflists and EL lists are now bad and will need to be updated. -- Orlady ( talk) 17:33, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
This article says that Judge Norman was elected to the Tennessee House of Representatives in 1962. Online records don't seem to go back that far; is anyone in a position to verify this with offline resources? Thanks. Gonzonoir ( talk) 09:20, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Chattanooga's Hunter Museum of American Art is one of sixteen art museums that is participating in the Wikipedia Loves Art project. If you're going to be anywhere near Chattanooga during the month of February, bring your camera to the museum and join the contest. More details are here. Kaldari ( talk) 22:01, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
|
I thought this WikiProject might be interested. Ping me with any specific queries or leave them on the page linked to above. Thanks! - Jarry1250 ( t, c) 22:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Here are the first hundred or so people covered in the Tennessee Encyclopedia of History and Culture:
It looks like we're missing about half of them in Wikipedia. Kaldari ( talk) 02:21, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
From searching the DYK archives:
98.166.139.216 ( talk) 23:23, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.
All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot ( Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 06:43, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey there, I am going to rate the unrated TN articles for quality and importance in the next few days. For the TN project, it looks pretty bad that there are new articles accumulating that do not receive a rating, it looks like no one cares about additions and changes to articles related to TN. Ratings do not only help Wikipedia to classify articles and to get the status quo regarding the quality, it also gives feedback and encouragement to users who created the article. If - like it was the case many months ago - there are different opinions about my ratings, feel free to just change it without complaining in a 1000 words about something that can be fixed in 2 seconds. If - like months ago - you feel that one of 100 articles was rated wrong, please just change the rating without filling a book of complaints which would take another book to answer. If you think that 99% of my ratings are fine, please just correct the 1% that you think I got wrong to the rating you find appropriate without leaving a book full of comments about why you would have done that differently. If you can fix my mistake in two seconds, please do it, do not waste hours on explaining why. Thank you! doxTxob \ talk 06:52, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Hey, is it possible to implement the B-class quality criteria checklist into the TN project banner like the Military history project does? Example here: Talk:Andrew Jackson Caldwell. The criteria are listed in the banner code and can be checked yes or no there and the result is on display in the banner. That is pretty neat and it would let article creators know about the criteria and give help to the one who rates the articles. Thank you, doxTxob \ talk 07:06, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Does anyone know why Trousdale County, Tennessee is lacking a infobox? I tried searching for it but it redirected to the Tennessee State Box. Terrancee ( talk) 22:55, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Hey, I have changed the TN project banner to read "priority" instead of "importance" to avoid confusion. As discussed many months ago, the formulation "priority" was preferred over "importance" as the latter sounds to much as a general determination of the importance of the topic. I agree fully. I have changed parameters in the baner to now read "priority" instead of "importance". There is no need to rename the categories in my opinion, article would still land in the Category:XXX-importance-TN-articles but the banner would read "priority" instead. The banner tag parameter "|importance=XXX" would still be used as it was. I have updated the Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennessee/Assessment page to reflect the new wording and the banner links to the new headings. It now reads: "An article's priority assessment is generated from the importance parameter", that is alright. The importance parameter determins the prority assessment. IMO there is no reason to change the name of the priority or importance categories or any other syntax. If you hate it, please revert my edits. If you love it, please use it. Take care, doxTxob \ talk 05:47, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows ( full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.
If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to
report bugs and
request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a
"news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none
parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at
Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.
Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.
Thanks. — Headbomb { ταλκ κοντριβς – WP Physics} 09:45, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)
Since Tennessee's weather has entered into warm Spring weather, fellow members are encouraged to expand articles about Tennessee's Protected Areas including State Parks and State Forests. If you find yourself visiting any of these areas this Spring, Summer, or Fall why not take a few pictures and/or report about the history of the area? -- Ichabod ( talk) 21:22, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
This message is being sent to WikiProjects with GAs under their scope. Since August 2007, WikiProject Good Articles has been participating in GA sweeps. The process helps to ensure that articles that have passed a nomination before that date meet the GA criteria. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. Instead of reviewing by topic, editors can consider picking and choosing whichever articles they are interested in.
We are always looking for new members to assist with reviewing the remaining articles, and since this project has GAs under its scope, it would be beneficial if any of its members could review a few articles (perhaps your project's articles). Your project's members are likely to be more knowledgeable about your topic GAs then an outside reviewer. As a result, reviewing your project's articles would improve the quality of the review in ensuring that the article meets your project's concerns on sourcing, content, and guidelines. However, members can also review any other article in the worklist to ensure it meets the GA criteria.
If any members are interested, please visit the GA sweeps page for further details and instructions in initiating a review. If you'd like to join the process, please add your name to the running total page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles from the worklist or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. With ~1,300 articles left to review, we would appreciate any editors that could contribute in helping to uphold the quality of GAs. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 06:54, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Just a heads up - I've tagged the article with your project. APK straight up now tell me 14:45, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Could someone familiar with NRHP verify that Cades Cove is not a historic district? Apparently I'm confused as to what constitutes a historic district and what does not. User:Nyttend says it is not a historic district, but rather a series of individual listings. Bms4880 ( talk) 14:13, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
P.S. Here is the nomination form. Bms4880 ( talk) 15:15, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Carter, Pickett, Hamblen, and the distant world that is Johnson County are in the bag, leaving the following remaining county pages that do not have courthouse images in their infoboxes. Most are in West or west-Middle, the exceptions being Hancock, Hamilton, and Coffee.
- Bms4880 ( talk) 18:50, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Is there a Wikipedia policy regarding creationist viewpoints? Someone added a "separate creationist viewpoint" to the Appalachian Mountains article. He basically just made some language passive, but I figured this issue would come up again at some point. Bms4880 ( talk) 13:47, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
I'm submitting a request to have this project indexed by "popular pages" (at this link), which produces lists of the pages with the most page views. This could be useful in identifying articles deserving of editing attention. -- Orlady ( talk) 00:42, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Their url has for years been tennesseeencyclopedia.net. Did it change? Our reference sections may contain several hundred links to their articles. Bms4880 ( talk) 20:03, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
After a recent request, I added WikiProject Tennessee to the list of projects to compile monthly pageview stats for. The data is the same used by http://stats.grok.se/en/ but the program is different, and includes the aggregate views from all redirects to each page. The stats are at Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennessee/Most-viewed pages.
The page will be updated monthly with new data. The edits aren't marked as bot edits, so they will show up in watchlists. You can view more results, request a new project be added to the list, or request a configuration change for this project using the toolserver tool. If you have any comments or suggestions, please let me know. Thanks! Mr. Z-man 01:49, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
I've just overhauled the Interstate 40 in Tennessee article, adding a route description and history section. While I know the section of I-40 between Cookeville and North Carolina very well, I'm not familiar with I-40 west of Nashville, having only driven it a few times. Someone familiar with the Middle and West Tennessee sections of I-40 may want to check and/or expand these sections under the article's route description. Bms4880 ( talk) 14:55, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl ( CBM · talk) 04:00, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Would anyone be interested in forming a WikiProject based on the City of Memphis and the surrounding area? Normally I would propose a task force, but the metro area is in multiple states (AR, MS, and TN), so I am instead proposing a WikiProject as the group cannot be a task force of any one state. WhisperToMe ( talk) 13:56, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
A User:Talamachusee is adding large blocks of unsourced information to the Chiaha article, and I'm going to commit 3RR if I go any further in reverting it. If someone could check on this, I would appreciate it. Bms4880 ( talk) 21:26, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. You are being notified as your project banner is on the talk page of the article. I have found a number of concerns which you can see at Talk:Tennessee Volunteers women's basketball/GA1. I have immediately de-listed the article as the referencing is so poor. When these issues are fixed the article can be re-nominated at WP:GAN. If you disagree with the reassessment please contest this at WP:GAR. Thanks. Jezhotwells ( talk) 21:09, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
User:DASHBot/Wikiprojects provides a list, updated daily, of unreferenced living people articles ( BLPs) related to your project. There has been a lot of discussion recently about deleting these unreferenced articles, so it is important that these articles are referenced.
The unreferenced articles related to your project can be found at >>> Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennessee/Archive 3/Unreferenced BLPs<<<
If you do not want this wikiproject to participate, please add your project name to this list.
Thank you.
Tennessee aficionados may wish to weigh in at Talk:Old Natchez Trace. The issue at hand is whether Old Natchez Trace should redirect to Natchez Trace or be a disambiguation page pointing to potential articles about National Register of Historic Places listings that include the words "Old Natchez Trace" in their record names. -- Orlady ( talk) 06:05, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
I'm interested in finding someone in the vicinity of Asheville, North Carolina, to take a photograph for me. If you're interested, please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Visual_arts#Picture_needed. Raul654 ( talk) 16:38, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
I'm going to overhaul the Knoxville Whig article, and I'm planning to move it to title that is more encompassing of all incarnations of Brownlow's Whig paper (it was basically the same paper, published under various titles at various locations over the years). I was wondering, what would be the best title? Possibilities are "Brownlow's Whig", which is a common name for all of his newspapers, or Whig followed by something in parentheses. Bms4880 ( talk) 18:07, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
The Political Cesspool has been nominated as a Featured Article. The discussion is here. Feel free to contribute. Stonemason89 ( talk) 00:40, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Someone is trying to add this link to the Norris Dam article - would this qualify as spam? Microsoft's Commercial Intent tool dubs it non-commercial, but there are an awful lot of banners on it. It doesn't add much to the article. Bms4880 ( talk) 15:45, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
I brought this up a year or two ago...and decided today I'd get around to doing it. I know that we've been removing the notable residents sections from a few articles...I'm going to try to do them all. They are all trivia, there is no criteria as to what constitutes a "resident" (the White House, Tennessee article included Andrew Jackson because he was rumored to have maybe spent the night there once) and they are mostly unreferenced. -- Smashville talk 21:13, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
Could a member of this project living in the Memphis area possibly take some photographs of Temple Israel (Memphis, Tennessee)? It's currently over 54kb (and over 5200 words), and a WP:GA candidate, but has not one picture! Jayjg (talk) 02:58, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
This page has been initiated - any help in filling in missing federal courthouses, or providing missing information on listed courthouses (especially pictures) would be appreciated. Cheers! bd2412 T 00:38, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Sigh! In its infinite wisdom, the new Republican majority in the General Assembly has decided to dump the old http://www.legislature.state.tn.us/ URL and change everything over to http://www.capitol.tn.gov/ . Suffixes also have been changed from "htm" to "html". This means that many links in reflists and EL lists are now bad and will need to be updated. -- Orlady ( talk) 17:33, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
This article says that Judge Norman was elected to the Tennessee House of Representatives in 1962. Online records don't seem to go back that far; is anyone in a position to verify this with offline resources? Thanks. Gonzonoir ( talk) 09:20, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Chattanooga's Hunter Museum of American Art is one of sixteen art museums that is participating in the Wikipedia Loves Art project. If you're going to be anywhere near Chattanooga during the month of February, bring your camera to the museum and join the contest. More details are here. Kaldari ( talk) 22:01, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
|
I thought this WikiProject might be interested. Ping me with any specific queries or leave them on the page linked to above. Thanks! - Jarry1250 ( t, c) 22:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Here are the first hundred or so people covered in the Tennessee Encyclopedia of History and Culture:
It looks like we're missing about half of them in Wikipedia. Kaldari ( talk) 02:21, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
From searching the DYK archives:
98.166.139.216 ( talk) 23:23, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.
All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot ( Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 06:43, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey there, I am going to rate the unrated TN articles for quality and importance in the next few days. For the TN project, it looks pretty bad that there are new articles accumulating that do not receive a rating, it looks like no one cares about additions and changes to articles related to TN. Ratings do not only help Wikipedia to classify articles and to get the status quo regarding the quality, it also gives feedback and encouragement to users who created the article. If - like it was the case many months ago - there are different opinions about my ratings, feel free to just change it without complaining in a 1000 words about something that can be fixed in 2 seconds. If - like months ago - you feel that one of 100 articles was rated wrong, please just change the rating without filling a book of complaints which would take another book to answer. If you think that 99% of my ratings are fine, please just correct the 1% that you think I got wrong to the rating you find appropriate without leaving a book full of comments about why you would have done that differently. If you can fix my mistake in two seconds, please do it, do not waste hours on explaining why. Thank you! doxTxob \ talk 06:52, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Hey, is it possible to implement the B-class quality criteria checklist into the TN project banner like the Military history project does? Example here: Talk:Andrew Jackson Caldwell. The criteria are listed in the banner code and can be checked yes or no there and the result is on display in the banner. That is pretty neat and it would let article creators know about the criteria and give help to the one who rates the articles. Thank you, doxTxob \ talk 07:06, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Does anyone know why Trousdale County, Tennessee is lacking a infobox? I tried searching for it but it redirected to the Tennessee State Box. Terrancee ( talk) 22:55, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Hey, I have changed the TN project banner to read "priority" instead of "importance" to avoid confusion. As discussed many months ago, the formulation "priority" was preferred over "importance" as the latter sounds to much as a general determination of the importance of the topic. I agree fully. I have changed parameters in the baner to now read "priority" instead of "importance". There is no need to rename the categories in my opinion, article would still land in the Category:XXX-importance-TN-articles but the banner would read "priority" instead. The banner tag parameter "|importance=XXX" would still be used as it was. I have updated the Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennessee/Assessment page to reflect the new wording and the banner links to the new headings. It now reads: "An article's priority assessment is generated from the importance parameter", that is alright. The importance parameter determins the prority assessment. IMO there is no reason to change the name of the priority or importance categories or any other syntax. If you hate it, please revert my edits. If you love it, please use it. Take care, doxTxob \ talk 05:47, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows ( full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.
If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to
report bugs and
request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a
"news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none
parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at
Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.
Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.
Thanks. — Headbomb { ταλκ κοντριβς – WP Physics} 09:45, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)
Since Tennessee's weather has entered into warm Spring weather, fellow members are encouraged to expand articles about Tennessee's Protected Areas including State Parks and State Forests. If you find yourself visiting any of these areas this Spring, Summer, or Fall why not take a few pictures and/or report about the history of the area? -- Ichabod ( talk) 21:22, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
This message is being sent to WikiProjects with GAs under their scope. Since August 2007, WikiProject Good Articles has been participating in GA sweeps. The process helps to ensure that articles that have passed a nomination before that date meet the GA criteria. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. Instead of reviewing by topic, editors can consider picking and choosing whichever articles they are interested in.
We are always looking for new members to assist with reviewing the remaining articles, and since this project has GAs under its scope, it would be beneficial if any of its members could review a few articles (perhaps your project's articles). Your project's members are likely to be more knowledgeable about your topic GAs then an outside reviewer. As a result, reviewing your project's articles would improve the quality of the review in ensuring that the article meets your project's concerns on sourcing, content, and guidelines. However, members can also review any other article in the worklist to ensure it meets the GA criteria.
If any members are interested, please visit the GA sweeps page for further details and instructions in initiating a review. If you'd like to join the process, please add your name to the running total page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles from the worklist or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. With ~1,300 articles left to review, we would appreciate any editors that could contribute in helping to uphold the quality of GAs. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 06:54, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Just a heads up - I've tagged the article with your project. APK straight up now tell me 14:45, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Could someone familiar with NRHP verify that Cades Cove is not a historic district? Apparently I'm confused as to what constitutes a historic district and what does not. User:Nyttend says it is not a historic district, but rather a series of individual listings. Bms4880 ( talk) 14:13, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
P.S. Here is the nomination form. Bms4880 ( talk) 15:15, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Carter, Pickett, Hamblen, and the distant world that is Johnson County are in the bag, leaving the following remaining county pages that do not have courthouse images in their infoboxes. Most are in West or west-Middle, the exceptions being Hancock, Hamilton, and Coffee.
- Bms4880 ( talk) 18:50, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Is there a Wikipedia policy regarding creationist viewpoints? Someone added a "separate creationist viewpoint" to the Appalachian Mountains article. He basically just made some language passive, but I figured this issue would come up again at some point. Bms4880 ( talk) 13:47, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
I'm submitting a request to have this project indexed by "popular pages" (at this link), which produces lists of the pages with the most page views. This could be useful in identifying articles deserving of editing attention. -- Orlady ( talk) 00:42, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Their url has for years been tennesseeencyclopedia.net. Did it change? Our reference sections may contain several hundred links to their articles. Bms4880 ( talk) 20:03, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
After a recent request, I added WikiProject Tennessee to the list of projects to compile monthly pageview stats for. The data is the same used by http://stats.grok.se/en/ but the program is different, and includes the aggregate views from all redirects to each page. The stats are at Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennessee/Most-viewed pages.
The page will be updated monthly with new data. The edits aren't marked as bot edits, so they will show up in watchlists. You can view more results, request a new project be added to the list, or request a configuration change for this project using the toolserver tool. If you have any comments or suggestions, please let me know. Thanks! Mr. Z-man 01:49, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
I've just overhauled the Interstate 40 in Tennessee article, adding a route description and history section. While I know the section of I-40 between Cookeville and North Carolina very well, I'm not familiar with I-40 west of Nashville, having only driven it a few times. Someone familiar with the Middle and West Tennessee sections of I-40 may want to check and/or expand these sections under the article's route description. Bms4880 ( talk) 14:55, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl ( CBM · talk) 04:00, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Would anyone be interested in forming a WikiProject based on the City of Memphis and the surrounding area? Normally I would propose a task force, but the metro area is in multiple states (AR, MS, and TN), so I am instead proposing a WikiProject as the group cannot be a task force of any one state. WhisperToMe ( talk) 13:56, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
A User:Talamachusee is adding large blocks of unsourced information to the Chiaha article, and I'm going to commit 3RR if I go any further in reverting it. If someone could check on this, I would appreciate it. Bms4880 ( talk) 21:26, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. You are being notified as your project banner is on the talk page of the article. I have found a number of concerns which you can see at Talk:Tennessee Volunteers women's basketball/GA1. I have immediately de-listed the article as the referencing is so poor. When these issues are fixed the article can be re-nominated at WP:GAN. If you disagree with the reassessment please contest this at WP:GAR. Thanks. Jezhotwells ( talk) 21:09, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
User:DASHBot/Wikiprojects provides a list, updated daily, of unreferenced living people articles ( BLPs) related to your project. There has been a lot of discussion recently about deleting these unreferenced articles, so it is important that these articles are referenced.
The unreferenced articles related to your project can be found at >>> Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennessee/Archive 3/Unreferenced BLPs<<<
If you do not want this wikiproject to participate, please add your project name to this list.
Thank you.
Tennessee aficionados may wish to weigh in at Talk:Old Natchez Trace. The issue at hand is whether Old Natchez Trace should redirect to Natchez Trace or be a disambiguation page pointing to potential articles about National Register of Historic Places listings that include the words "Old Natchez Trace" in their record names. -- Orlady ( talk) 06:05, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
I'm interested in finding someone in the vicinity of Asheville, North Carolina, to take a photograph for me. If you're interested, please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Visual_arts#Picture_needed. Raul654 ( talk) 16:38, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
I'm going to overhaul the Knoxville Whig article, and I'm planning to move it to title that is more encompassing of all incarnations of Brownlow's Whig paper (it was basically the same paper, published under various titles at various locations over the years). I was wondering, what would be the best title? Possibilities are "Brownlow's Whig", which is a common name for all of his newspapers, or Whig followed by something in parentheses. Bms4880 ( talk) 18:07, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
The Political Cesspool has been nominated as a Featured Article. The discussion is here. Feel free to contribute. Stonemason89 ( talk) 00:40, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Someone is trying to add this link to the Norris Dam article - would this qualify as spam? Microsoft's Commercial Intent tool dubs it non-commercial, but there are an awful lot of banners on it. It doesn't add much to the article. Bms4880 ( talk) 15:45, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
I brought this up a year or two ago...and decided today I'd get around to doing it. I know that we've been removing the notable residents sections from a few articles...I'm going to try to do them all. They are all trivia, there is no criteria as to what constitutes a "resident" (the White House, Tennessee article included Andrew Jackson because he was rumored to have maybe spent the night there once) and they are mostly unreferenced. -- Smashville talk 21:13, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
Could a member of this project living in the Memphis area possibly take some photographs of Temple Israel (Memphis, Tennessee)? It's currently over 54kb (and over 5200 words), and a WP:GA candidate, but has not one picture! Jayjg (talk) 02:58, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
This page has been initiated - any help in filling in missing federal courthouses, or providing missing information on listed courthouses (especially pictures) would be appreciated. Cheers! bd2412 T 00:38, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |