Television: Broadcasting Project‑class | ||||||||||
|
I suggest that we use American English names and descriptions for technical aspects of television, with the explicit exception of colour or analogue when referring to technologies that are based almost entirely outside of North America (examples include PAL, SECAM, and SCART). -- tonsofpcs ( Talk) 03:57, 13 July 2008 (UTC), edited before any replies: tonsofpcs ( Talk) 03:47, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
I suggest that we use the following conventions:
I am more familiar with distribution than the actual platforms... but, I do enjoy templating so if you would like I can throw together a couple of templates for ya. for example, here is a userbox you could use if you want
This user is a member of the B.E.a.T. Taskforce. |
if you want I can add that as a sub page for the task force. I can also create one for talk pages to explain when an article is within the scope of your task force.
Other than that I may could help you with a few articles about distribution if you want. I am not as familiar with NTSC and PAL and have nothing really to add those those subjects but let me know, I have this page watched so I will see it if you reply here. %% -SYKKO-%% ( talk to me) 20:09, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
The community should come to a consensus on how to handle issues of analog resolution, pixel resolution, comparisons thereof, and how to handle non-square pixels and comparison thereof. Please leave suggestions and discuss these issues. -- tonsofpcs ( Talk) 18:00, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
I have marked this task force as semi-active because I am here and because I have invited others to join. We'll see what happens. ~ Kvng ( talk) 20:37, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Editor Rocklaw ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) keeps asserting that the S-VHS ( talk) article is wrong in its resolution claims.
Rocklaw keeps changing e.g. the "330" figure for NTSC's lines of horizontal resolution per picture height to 480, stating ~"NTSC had [sic] 525 scan lines and about 480 visible!" Well, it does, but...
To her/his credit, Rocklaw did start a section at talk:S-VHS. But then s/he ignored my explanation there and continued to edit the article per the mistaken belief that the claim of "330 lines" was talking about the horizontal scan lines.
Please see history at S-VHS and the talk page discussion.
If a few technically knowledgeable people can back me up (and help keep the article correct, because I'm close to 3RR today) that'd be great. Jeh ( talk) 22:53, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
Per [1], "M" designations have been removed from standards names. Do we want to rename a bunch of articles and links? I'm happy to do the work but want to raise it here before doing all that and having it reverted for some unforeseen reason. Contents of {{ SMPTE standards}} will give you an idea of the extent of the changes. ~ Kvng ( talk) 16:43, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Mango från yttre rymden has changed project status from semi-active to inactive. Don't turn the lights out, I'm still here. Is anyone else? ~ Kvng ( talk) 14:39, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Television: Broadcasting Project‑class | ||||||||||
|
I suggest that we use American English names and descriptions for technical aspects of television, with the explicit exception of colour or analogue when referring to technologies that are based almost entirely outside of North America (examples include PAL, SECAM, and SCART). -- tonsofpcs ( Talk) 03:57, 13 July 2008 (UTC), edited before any replies: tonsofpcs ( Talk) 03:47, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
I suggest that we use the following conventions:
I am more familiar with distribution than the actual platforms... but, I do enjoy templating so if you would like I can throw together a couple of templates for ya. for example, here is a userbox you could use if you want
This user is a member of the B.E.a.T. Taskforce. |
if you want I can add that as a sub page for the task force. I can also create one for talk pages to explain when an article is within the scope of your task force.
Other than that I may could help you with a few articles about distribution if you want. I am not as familiar with NTSC and PAL and have nothing really to add those those subjects but let me know, I have this page watched so I will see it if you reply here. %% -SYKKO-%% ( talk to me) 20:09, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
The community should come to a consensus on how to handle issues of analog resolution, pixel resolution, comparisons thereof, and how to handle non-square pixels and comparison thereof. Please leave suggestions and discuss these issues. -- tonsofpcs ( Talk) 18:00, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
I have marked this task force as semi-active because I am here and because I have invited others to join. We'll see what happens. ~ Kvng ( talk) 20:37, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Editor Rocklaw ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) keeps asserting that the S-VHS ( talk) article is wrong in its resolution claims.
Rocklaw keeps changing e.g. the "330" figure for NTSC's lines of horizontal resolution per picture height to 480, stating ~"NTSC had [sic] 525 scan lines and about 480 visible!" Well, it does, but...
To her/his credit, Rocklaw did start a section at talk:S-VHS. But then s/he ignored my explanation there and continued to edit the article per the mistaken belief that the claim of "330 lines" was talking about the horizontal scan lines.
Please see history at S-VHS and the talk page discussion.
If a few technically knowledgeable people can back me up (and help keep the article correct, because I'm close to 3RR today) that'd be great. Jeh ( talk) 22:53, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
Per [1], "M" designations have been removed from standards names. Do we want to rename a bunch of articles and links? I'm happy to do the work but want to raise it here before doing all that and having it reverted for some unforeseen reason. Contents of {{ SMPTE standards}} will give you an idea of the extent of the changes. ~ Kvng ( talk) 16:43, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Mango från yttre rymden has changed project status from semi-active to inactive. Don't turn the lights out, I'm still here. Is anyone else? ~ Kvng ( talk) 14:39, 16 November 2022 (UTC)