Television Project‑class | |||||||
|
Is anyone working on the assessment requests? It doesn't seem like anyone has even looked at these for months! Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk | Sign 10:51, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Some of the episode summaries here - for Series 4 in particular - are poorly written. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.100.218.175 ( talk) 01:32, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Because there are articles still waiting since... 2010. -- Niemti ( talk) 21:43, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I've asked this question a few places but have yet to get definitive feedback. Any guidance is appreciated.
I'm looking for clarification on stub articles vs. non-stub articles and the requirement of sources. Can an article without any reliable sources be considered anything but stub class? (Start or above)? The reason I believe they need at least one source is that the Start class description states "article should satisfy fundamental content policies such as notability and BLP, and provide sources to establish verifiability." (I see the assessment guidelines here have added the work "enough" sources). I have been told by another editor that start class articles don't need sources, and I am confused. Where does it say this, and if this is the case, should the assessment scale for start be changed accordingly to be a little more clear?
I've asked at WP:STUB, Wikipedia_talk:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Assessment and the wikiproject I've been working on, WP:SOAPS, but haven't gotten a lot of feedback and am looking to find the definite answer. Thanks for your help. Kelly Marie 0812 ( talk) 16:18, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Request for assessment for The Voice of the Philippines and The Voice of the Philippines (season 1). Thanks!-- AR E N Z O Y 1 6A •t a l k• 17:26, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
@ Serialjoepsycho: Assessed as C class, Low importance. It's well-written and organized but it needs more references, period. I kept it at Low importance because it's not really notable at all outside the field of television. Nick1372 ( talk) 20:07, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello! I am wondering if one of your project's assessors would be kind enough to do a reassessment on the article Bing_(TV_series) please. It was initially marked as a stub within the article itself; I have just been back to the article and made at least one major addition to it and, whilst doing so, I have removed the stub template from the page.
It is sufficiently detailed enough to no longer be considered a stub to the encyclopedia, but I am not prepared to edit your project's template on the talk page, since I am not part of your project and do not know your assessment guidelines. Your help in passing a second pair of eyes over this article would be warmly appreciated! Thank you. What does the Fish say? | Woof! 11:49, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
I was wondering if someone can re-evaluate the Quality and Importance of Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey. I just looked at other B quality shows and many seem less complete than this page. Regarding importance I am unclear on the criteria, but as a documentary series this sequel to the original Cosmos seems better than Low importance. RobP ( talk) 15:24, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Greetings, For Television wikiproject statistics, I added a link to "Popular pages", a bot-generated list of pageviews, useful for focused cleanup of frequently viewed articles. Regards, JoeHebda ( talk) 19:16, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
a brief summary of the plot (100–200 words) is applicableand
should generally be brief but complete, including spoilers). Also in WikiProject Big Brother's structure, there is a list of what specific events should be included, which is followed in the entire Episode section. Either way, I definitely want to make the article better and will be working on reception. Thank you for always responding quickly! Jayab 314 01:47, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television#Big Brother season article format on whether we should use, abandon, or rewrite Wikipedia:WikiProject Big Brother/Structure of series or season articles. Jayab 314 16:39, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Television Project‑class | |||||||
|
Is anyone working on the assessment requests? It doesn't seem like anyone has even looked at these for months! Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk | Sign 10:51, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Some of the episode summaries here - for Series 4 in particular - are poorly written. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.100.218.175 ( talk) 01:32, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Because there are articles still waiting since... 2010. -- Niemti ( talk) 21:43, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I've asked this question a few places but have yet to get definitive feedback. Any guidance is appreciated.
I'm looking for clarification on stub articles vs. non-stub articles and the requirement of sources. Can an article without any reliable sources be considered anything but stub class? (Start or above)? The reason I believe they need at least one source is that the Start class description states "article should satisfy fundamental content policies such as notability and BLP, and provide sources to establish verifiability." (I see the assessment guidelines here have added the work "enough" sources). I have been told by another editor that start class articles don't need sources, and I am confused. Where does it say this, and if this is the case, should the assessment scale for start be changed accordingly to be a little more clear?
I've asked at WP:STUB, Wikipedia_talk:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Assessment and the wikiproject I've been working on, WP:SOAPS, but haven't gotten a lot of feedback and am looking to find the definite answer. Thanks for your help. Kelly Marie 0812 ( talk) 16:18, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Request for assessment for The Voice of the Philippines and The Voice of the Philippines (season 1). Thanks!-- AR E N Z O Y 1 6A •t a l k• 17:26, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
@ Serialjoepsycho: Assessed as C class, Low importance. It's well-written and organized but it needs more references, period. I kept it at Low importance because it's not really notable at all outside the field of television. Nick1372 ( talk) 20:07, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello! I am wondering if one of your project's assessors would be kind enough to do a reassessment on the article Bing_(TV_series) please. It was initially marked as a stub within the article itself; I have just been back to the article and made at least one major addition to it and, whilst doing so, I have removed the stub template from the page.
It is sufficiently detailed enough to no longer be considered a stub to the encyclopedia, but I am not prepared to edit your project's template on the talk page, since I am not part of your project and do not know your assessment guidelines. Your help in passing a second pair of eyes over this article would be warmly appreciated! Thank you. What does the Fish say? | Woof! 11:49, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
I was wondering if someone can re-evaluate the Quality and Importance of Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey. I just looked at other B quality shows and many seem less complete than this page. Regarding importance I am unclear on the criteria, but as a documentary series this sequel to the original Cosmos seems better than Low importance. RobP ( talk) 15:24, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Greetings, For Television wikiproject statistics, I added a link to "Popular pages", a bot-generated list of pageviews, useful for focused cleanup of frequently viewed articles. Regards, JoeHebda ( talk) 19:16, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
a brief summary of the plot (100–200 words) is applicableand
should generally be brief but complete, including spoilers). Also in WikiProject Big Brother's structure, there is a list of what specific events should be included, which is followed in the entire Episode section. Either way, I definitely want to make the article better and will be working on reception. Thank you for always responding quickly! Jayab 314 01:47, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television#Big Brother season article format on whether we should use, abandon, or rewrite Wikipedia:WikiProject Big Brother/Structure of series or season articles. Jayab 314 16:39, 4 October 2019 (UTC)