![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 30 | ← | Archive 34 | Archive 35 | Archive 36 | Archive 37 | Archive 38 | → | Archive 40 |
A user has taken the liberty to add a few additional RAW personalities to the Superstar list. I dunno how everyone wants this template to look, but I don't think Grisham should be included (not a superstar) and Austin's name (if included) shouldn't be listed as just Stone Cold. I figured I'd bring this to everyone's attention instead of editing this myself without discussing it with the template creators. -- Endless Dan 13:39, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Considering Todd Grisham has a RAW Superstar page, I'd say that probably qualifies him Tromboneguy0186 ( talk) 19:03, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
My proposal is to only add WWE employees who have a superstar page as apart of their "brand" (excluding referees). TrUcO9311 ( talk) 22:03, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Rory McAllister needs to be on the list. Feed back ☎ 02:21, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
I still disagree with the term Superstar applying to Grisham or announcers as per my reasons above, but that's neither here nor there. To help reduce the size of the table, why not eliminate the 'Inactive' sections of the table. Is it that vital that someone see this on the table? If someone reads (for example) Lashley's article, it will note that he is out of action. -- Endless Dan 14:08, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
I don't see what everyone means by the table being "too big" or anything. It is a little crowded, but it's no bigger (matter of fact, it might even be smaller) than the templates used for the rosters of every sports team with a wikipedia article. Tromboneguy0186 ( talk) 15:30, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
What the title says. This means that the '05, '06 and '07 editions of No Way Out all have their own article. If anyone wishes to complete the No Way Out set and create '00, '01, '02, '03 and '04, please do. :) Dav nel 03 07:54, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
I might just be stating the obvious here, but I've thought this for awhile and nobody else has brought it up. After any of the pay-per-views are fully expanded (I'll use No Way Out as an example, so years 2000-2007) we should take the old article that used to have all the results ( WWE No Way Out) and turn the dates/venues part into a Featured List. We might even be able to make some of the pay-per-views into Featured Topics. Just a thought that might help with motivation. Nikki 311 19:38, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
I think this project has done a great job lately with the focus on Good Article and Featured Article/List development. We've made significant progress in this area. One thing that I've been thinking about, though, is that we still have 779 stub articles (that are not likely to be chosen at Collaboration of the Week). I was thinking that it would be nice to challenge ourselves to see if we can improve a certain number of articles from Stub Class to Start Class by the end of the year. I was thinking of something like 15 articles. I was looking through some of the stubs, and quite a few stood out as articles that would have adequate resources for improvement or might already fit the criteria for Start Class. A few that stood out are:
I thought that if we had a place to show our progress (eg. a subpage, or making a list here and crossing out the ones that get promoted), a few people might be interested in helping trim the number of stubs. What do people think? Is this a worthwhile endeavor? GaryColemanFan ( talk) 21:10, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Whoa, I am busy like I dont know what with No Way Out (2004), List of WWE Hardcore Champions, and now the article above.
1) Should I move this article to List of professional wrestling pay-per-view events? 2) Should I make a big sort-table and put all the PPV's there? 3) Should I list other Indy-Promotions PPV's?
Thanx. -- TrUcO9311 ( talk) 05:00, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
If we keep Wrestling Pay-Per-View Events, what should we do about List of WWE pay-per-view events, List of WCW pay-per-view events, and List of ECW pay-per-view events? It's redundant to have all four when we could just have one. Nikki 311 17:39, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Just to let you guys know that I am planning to nominate WWE One Night Stand for FL status tomorrow night. Before I do, can you have a quick look at it and fix any typos or ref errors, dead links etc. Thanks, Dav nel 03 09:49, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
I got a chance to do some copyediting on this article. There are a couple of things that I don't think are very clear in the article, though, that I'm not sure how to fix:
And on a similar note, although not related to this article, is there a description of what a six-man match is in any article? I often find that I'd like to include a wikilink to clarify what the term means, but I don't know where I would link it to. Thanks. GaryColemanFan 18:05, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
I keep seeing this editor note in wrestling article subsections. Is this a real Wikipedia thing?«» bd( talk stalk) 19:36, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
New article. All thanks goes to Mshake3, who has been working hard on creating the article in his sandbox. Dav nel 03 21:40, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Would it be a good idea if I included details in the McMahons verses HBK and God match for Backlash, where Vince informed the referee to "check" God for foreign objects and his actions before the match? I need some suggestions. Zenlax T C S 20:43, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Could people from this project possibly support or oppose the above FAC, as at the moment, it only has 2 supports and 1 oppose. I've addressed all the issues raised so far, but it will be failed as it doesn't have a consensus at the moment. Can people please support/oppose the FAC otherwise it will be failed because of the lack of votes. Thanks! Dav nel 03 21:49, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Hey you all, I improved the List.-- TrUcO9311 ( talk) 00:40, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Just letting you guys know that I have nominated WWE One Night Stand for FL status. Dav nel 03 17:29, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Just thought I'd let everyone know that I've listed SummerSlam (2007) for Peer Review. Please comment here, thanks. -- L A X 17:35, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Well seems like the user has stop improving the article. Should we put it up for grabs?-- TrUcO9311 ( talk) 19:00, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
An IP edited the article and removed all references to Benoit, so that "WWE would not get bad publicity. I thought it might be worthwhile to bring it up, as I recall a time when a IP Checker tracked edits to WWE Headquarters in Stanford. Just a heads-up, as if that is the case, they'll likely be back. The edit can be found here. [ [1]]. Gavyn Sykes 02:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
I just put Category:TNA Champion Belts in CFD, but I didn't see anywhere to list it for the project. Does a section exist? RobJ1981 21:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
I've added columns to the ROH World Championship, ROH World Tag Team Championship, and ROH Pure Championship showing how many times each champion(s) successfully defended the title. I thought it was appropriate since it's often brought up in ROH's storylines and is something that can easily be tracked and verified. But I thought I'd let you all know, in case you all are opposed to it or something :p Tromboneguy0186 ( talk) 10:24, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Me and LAX are teaming up to work on Survivor Series 'o7.-- TrUcO9311 ( talk) 02:48, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
I recently created a sub user page for Force One Pro Wrestling ( User:Kris Classic/Force One Pro Wrestling). I was wondering, if anybody thinks this is notable enough for me to create its own article on wiki, and any suggestions for improvements? Thanks, Kris 23:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure about notability. I'm hesitant to give an okay about moving it into mainspace until there are some reliable third party sources. That would help prove notability. Nikki 311 00:04, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
It was featured on the first page of The Atlantic City Press, would a link to that be sufficient for notability? Kris 00:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Is that a newspaper/magazine/ or what? TrUcO9311 ( talk) 00:15, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
It is a Newspaper. Kris 00:17, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Well there really aren't any other sources to take from, unless you count results from wrestling websites. Kris 00:21, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Obseessed With Wrestling is one of the only reliable wrestling results site that we accept here. You can use that. Also cite another article that you find (not in the internet but in a paper) TrUcO9311 ( talk) 00:32, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
I have added several sources. Is it sufficient? Kris 00:51, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
I have two of the six sources from other websites. About how many more would be needed? Kris 01:00, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Well, I am unable to find any more outside sources. If anybody can find any that I can use, please let me know! Kris 01:29, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Okay, I have 3 outside sources, and 7 sources in total, I am going to create the article now. Thank you Nikki and Truco for all of your help! Kris 01:45, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
~ The Chronic 00:00, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Oh hey, look... I posted the comment at exactly 00:00. Yay me! :P The Chronic 00:50, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Should this even have an article? For those who don't know, it's an unofficial title in TNA (the same way the Million Dollar Championship was in WWF) that started at the TNA Genesis 2007 PPV, and they even created a belt for it that Young wears. If it does deserve an article, it needs to be cleaned up and sourced. TJ Spyke 23:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
From what was said here, I'm going to prod it. Nikki 311 04:24, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Davnel03 has changed his username to D.M.N.. The Chronic 23:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Is there an article on a tag team which has GA status or B status. Because I want to work on the APA and I want a point of reference. TrUcO9311 ( talk) 21:47, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
The Fabulous Kangaroos is a GA. -- Scorpion 0422 03:59, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
does it really make sense to list all the brands on ppv articles (beyond wrestlemania). I mean the whole company is featured. Shouldnt it be better like the 2001 PPV articles. TrUcO9311 ( talk) 21:50, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
I'm all for each PPV being given its own page, however does that necessarily mean we have to remove the card from the non-year specific pages. IE on the WWF Vengeance page it lists the PPVs from 2001 to 2008, yet the 2007 card isn't on the page because it has been moved. I'd like to propose the idea of keeping just the results on the page as well as having the detailed article seperate, much like International cricket in 2007 shows the dates and results of the matches, then the "see also" pages give individual scorecards, descriptions squads etc. Tony2Times 02:24, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
I actually meant to keep the bare minimum results regardless of the PPV having its own year page on the basis that the specific page will have build up, show and aftermath details as well as card with bullet point details afterwards. I'm suggesting having a link to those pages but also keep a single page that lists the card and the info box for all the years of a PPV. Tony2Times ( talk) 13:26, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
I've been working on the Royal Rumble article in my sandbox. I've got the list of venues, dates, winners, entry numbers, etc. etc. all sourced, but I'm having trouble sourcing the rules, match description, and effects of the brand extension. I've got the bare bones of it done, but there are a lot of rules and exceptions to rules that aren't sourced or deleted entirely. Help! :) If anybody can help me source this information or add to it (only if you cite a reliable source or it'll get deleted) it would be much appreciated. Thanks. Nikki 311 03:18, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
I nominated Royal Rumble (1994) for a Good Article review a while back. A user began the review, but it's been 13 days and nothing more has been said. Is it acceptable to post a polite message on her talk page to ask how the review is going? I appreciate someone being willing to do the review, and I don't want to seem pushy. I'm just concerned that, after two weeks, she might have forgotten about it. Any opinions? GaryColemanFan ( talk) 03:23, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
In Your House 1 has had its FA candidate failed, with many reviewers listing a ton of problems. I would therefore like to request if several members of this project are willing to copy-edit the article for me, as there seems to be several major problems with it. Cheers, Dav nel 03 16:33, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Now that Royal Rumble (1994) has been promoted to GA status, I was wondering if anyone is waiting to nominate another pay-per-view article. I posted notice a while back that I was planning to nominate Royal Rumble (1994) and King of the Ring (1994) for GA reviews. If someone else is waiting to nominate an article that they've been working on, though, I'm willing to wait. I have very little time for Wikipedia right now, so I'm in no hurry. GaryColemanFan ( talk) 04:00, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
NEW ARTICLE, however It is not complete and is under construction and I encourage you all to come help and improve this biography stub. In case you dont know he is the upcoming debuting ECW superstar from Jamaica. TrUcO9311 ( talk) 04:18, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Does anyone know much about this site under WP:RS? It has apparently been used for the Brock Lesnar article, and a user is trying to use it for wrestler CIMA on the Australian Wrestling Federation article. I recall this site not being mentioned specifically as a "dirtsheet" during the RFC on WWE spoilers but I got the impression some users would regard it as failing WP:RS. But I just want to make sure. !! Justa Punk !! 21:12, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Could somebody else please give an unbiased opinion without the personal backchat? !! Justa Punk !! 09:23, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Yes it is a reliable source. There is stuff on things other than wrestling if you haven't noticed! The website also provides columns and TV reports that can help in articles. Anyway. I've seen a load of reliable websites have credits from PWInsider, its what one article out of 10,000 that you've picked out there. Ah, there again.... Dav nel 03 16:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Just as a note, I came across this through a WQA request. Here is my comment. The citation in question, [2], is a blog entry. Note that the entry was "posted" by a username and not a journalist, and that it was credited to a more authoritative news source. Cite _that_ source if it meets WP:V, WP:CITE, etc. (PWInsider.com). I trust that it can be met; if not, the source should not be used. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seicer ( talk • contribs) 03:09, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
This article was passed as a Good Article today. Thank you to everyone who contributed to the article and/or gave feedback. It helped quite a bit.
With that said, the reviewer did add the following: "Does require another couple of images to say, illustrate a "casket" match and the even poster would be good as other wrestling PPV articles have them. I shall pass the imaes criteria now, but may re-assess as a fail if this is not rectified."
I'm fairly sure that it would be hard to find a Free Use image of the casket match, but if anyone knows where to find a Free Use or Fair Use picture of the match, it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks again, GaryColemanFan ( talk) 22:05, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
The WWE website has some pictures that you might be able to use if you can dream up a suitable rationale. None of them are of a casket match, though. Nikki 311 22:36, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
There have been rumors posted on some news sites for the last few days of Senshi being granted his release from TNA. Allegedly, this took place on Monday. However, he has appeared at television tapings since then. If there could be someone(s) capable of clarifying on both Senshi's page and the one for the TNA roster, it would be much appreciated. Thank you. Hezekiah957 ( talk) 23:35, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
I dont know about you all, but there have been many IP edits in the past week. As you all know I created the Kofi Kingston article and an IP blanked 90% of the article, do any of you all know how to regain the original information?-- TrUcO9311 ( talk) 15:52, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
I've been trying to address concerns brought up during the Featured List nomination of IWGP World Tag Team Championship. The poster said he or she wanted the first four columns sortable. I've figured out most of the process, but I'm running into trouble. Because of the way the dates are listed, it's not sorting them correctly. It also seems to be having trouble with empty columns (for example, clicking on the "Location" box gives an empty box at the top. Clicking on it again gives the title changes in Yokohama at the top, followed by 7 empty boxes). And apparently there's supposed to be something with a "sortbottom" command, but I couldn't get it to work with that included. Would someone who understands tables well be able to look at it? The Featured List candidacy is on its 11th day, so I'm trying to address the concerns brought up before the nomination is closed. Thanks. GaryColemanFan ( talk) 21:32, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
I resized the image in the infobox for you. I set it at 150 px, but feel free to change it if you see fit. Nikki 311 02:55, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
May you all fellow Wikipedians go here for peer review. Thanks. TrUcO9311 ( talk) 05:13, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
The newsletter pages have been really quiet as of late (not a failure, but quiet). Do visit the newsletter's talk page now and then. It would help. :) The Chronic 07:23, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
I'd just like to quickly propose that uses of the word "legit" be changed to "legitimate". It reads more like an actual article and not something written by an "insider". Tnova4 ( talk) 16:16, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
As you probably know, Undertaker is the COTW. I'm proposing moving the nicknames, themes, and signature taunt lists from his main article to the Personas of The Undertaker article because the main article is so long. The discussion is HERE. Please comment and vote there. Thanks. Nikki 311 17:53, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
This article passed its Featured List nomination today. Thank you to everyone who worked on the page, and thank you to everyone who helped out with an editor's last-minute concerns. Once again, your help is appreciated. GaryColemanFan ( talk) 03:09, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Where the heck did that go? Now where do people go to see what PW articles are up for deletion? Prodded? In need of sources etc? when did this disappear and why? MPJ-DK ( talk) 05:45, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
I think this article should be nominated as a Featured List. My biggest concern is that some people don't like Featured Lists without pictures. Would it be okay to add the picture from http://www.bodyslamming.com/ajpw/pics/ajpwtriplecrown.jpg ? I don't know the origin of the picture, but it's available at a few places on the internet. GaryColemanFan ( talk) 05:48, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
I posted notice about nominating this article over a month ago. I waited to nominate it so that there wouldn't be too many wrestling pay-per-views nominated at once. After Royal Rumble (1994) passed its GA review, I inquired as to whether or not anyone else wanted to nominate a PPV. Nobody responded, so I nominated this article today. Thank you to all of the editors who helped build the article and who contributed to the peer review. As with Royal Rumble (1994), I have requested a reviewer from outside of this project to avoid accusations of conflict of interest. GaryColemanFan ( talk) 06:02, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
I need some help with the article. If anyone wants to help, I'll be grateful. Zenlax T C S 20:59, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Film at 11. Mshake3 ( talk) 05:43, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Um...... I won? Mshake3 ( talk) 00:45, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
(Oh and next time tell Justapunk to go to Request for User conduct instead of wikiquette alert.)
This user has gone to town uploading images without proper copyright information, mostly images straight from WCW or WWE that violate image policies, and putting them into the according wrestler's wiki articles. I think there is a bunch of undo-ing to be done. I would do it myself, but not sure the proper way to go about it really. Just wanted to alert the right people. Yagobo79 ( talk) 13:13, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
I know this has been asked before but which of these can be uses for as in results.
Lords of Pain | Wrestle View | Wrestling Attitude | The History of WWE | Steve's Wrestling | Online on Slaught | TWNPnews | Gerweck | Wrestling Information Archive |
and if some of these arent may you give me links to which I may use (other than Online World of Wrestling, and hoffco-inc)-- TrUcO9311 ( talk) 16:33, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
I don't think Wrestleview should be a definite "no". They are a reliable source, and have been running for over 10 years. Kris ( talk) 23:03, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Yes, and they do have sources within the WWE. Kris ( talk) 02:54, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
hello everyone! I'm back after a LOOOOONG wikibreak! How is everyone? What have I missed? The Pink Panther ( talk) 23:53, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Cheers, Feed back ☎ 00:39, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Mshake has brought up a good point in this. Is it really notable of these Legends actually being "killed"? Zenlax T C S 20:12, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
I have nominated AJPW Triple Crown Championship for Featured List status. I've seen it referred to as the most important championship in professional wrestling, and the article is well-sourced. If anyone has a chance to look it over, please feel free to do so. If you Support or Oppose the nomination, please give an explanation for your vote on the nomination page. Thanks, GaryColemanFan ( talk) 16:11, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 30 | ← | Archive 34 | Archive 35 | Archive 36 | Archive 37 | Archive 38 | → | Archive 40 |
A user has taken the liberty to add a few additional RAW personalities to the Superstar list. I dunno how everyone wants this template to look, but I don't think Grisham should be included (not a superstar) and Austin's name (if included) shouldn't be listed as just Stone Cold. I figured I'd bring this to everyone's attention instead of editing this myself without discussing it with the template creators. -- Endless Dan 13:39, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Considering Todd Grisham has a RAW Superstar page, I'd say that probably qualifies him Tromboneguy0186 ( talk) 19:03, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
My proposal is to only add WWE employees who have a superstar page as apart of their "brand" (excluding referees). TrUcO9311 ( talk) 22:03, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Rory McAllister needs to be on the list. Feed back ☎ 02:21, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
I still disagree with the term Superstar applying to Grisham or announcers as per my reasons above, but that's neither here nor there. To help reduce the size of the table, why not eliminate the 'Inactive' sections of the table. Is it that vital that someone see this on the table? If someone reads (for example) Lashley's article, it will note that he is out of action. -- Endless Dan 14:08, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
I don't see what everyone means by the table being "too big" or anything. It is a little crowded, but it's no bigger (matter of fact, it might even be smaller) than the templates used for the rosters of every sports team with a wikipedia article. Tromboneguy0186 ( talk) 15:30, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
What the title says. This means that the '05, '06 and '07 editions of No Way Out all have their own article. If anyone wishes to complete the No Way Out set and create '00, '01, '02, '03 and '04, please do. :) Dav nel 03 07:54, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
I might just be stating the obvious here, but I've thought this for awhile and nobody else has brought it up. After any of the pay-per-views are fully expanded (I'll use No Way Out as an example, so years 2000-2007) we should take the old article that used to have all the results ( WWE No Way Out) and turn the dates/venues part into a Featured List. We might even be able to make some of the pay-per-views into Featured Topics. Just a thought that might help with motivation. Nikki 311 19:38, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
I think this project has done a great job lately with the focus on Good Article and Featured Article/List development. We've made significant progress in this area. One thing that I've been thinking about, though, is that we still have 779 stub articles (that are not likely to be chosen at Collaboration of the Week). I was thinking that it would be nice to challenge ourselves to see if we can improve a certain number of articles from Stub Class to Start Class by the end of the year. I was thinking of something like 15 articles. I was looking through some of the stubs, and quite a few stood out as articles that would have adequate resources for improvement or might already fit the criteria for Start Class. A few that stood out are:
I thought that if we had a place to show our progress (eg. a subpage, or making a list here and crossing out the ones that get promoted), a few people might be interested in helping trim the number of stubs. What do people think? Is this a worthwhile endeavor? GaryColemanFan ( talk) 21:10, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Whoa, I am busy like I dont know what with No Way Out (2004), List of WWE Hardcore Champions, and now the article above.
1) Should I move this article to List of professional wrestling pay-per-view events? 2) Should I make a big sort-table and put all the PPV's there? 3) Should I list other Indy-Promotions PPV's?
Thanx. -- TrUcO9311 ( talk) 05:00, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
If we keep Wrestling Pay-Per-View Events, what should we do about List of WWE pay-per-view events, List of WCW pay-per-view events, and List of ECW pay-per-view events? It's redundant to have all four when we could just have one. Nikki 311 17:39, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Just to let you guys know that I am planning to nominate WWE One Night Stand for FL status tomorrow night. Before I do, can you have a quick look at it and fix any typos or ref errors, dead links etc. Thanks, Dav nel 03 09:49, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
I got a chance to do some copyediting on this article. There are a couple of things that I don't think are very clear in the article, though, that I'm not sure how to fix:
And on a similar note, although not related to this article, is there a description of what a six-man match is in any article? I often find that I'd like to include a wikilink to clarify what the term means, but I don't know where I would link it to. Thanks. GaryColemanFan 18:05, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
I keep seeing this editor note in wrestling article subsections. Is this a real Wikipedia thing?«» bd( talk stalk) 19:36, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
New article. All thanks goes to Mshake3, who has been working hard on creating the article in his sandbox. Dav nel 03 21:40, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Would it be a good idea if I included details in the McMahons verses HBK and God match for Backlash, where Vince informed the referee to "check" God for foreign objects and his actions before the match? I need some suggestions. Zenlax T C S 20:43, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Could people from this project possibly support or oppose the above FAC, as at the moment, it only has 2 supports and 1 oppose. I've addressed all the issues raised so far, but it will be failed as it doesn't have a consensus at the moment. Can people please support/oppose the FAC otherwise it will be failed because of the lack of votes. Thanks! Dav nel 03 21:49, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Hey you all, I improved the List.-- TrUcO9311 ( talk) 00:40, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Just letting you guys know that I have nominated WWE One Night Stand for FL status. Dav nel 03 17:29, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Just thought I'd let everyone know that I've listed SummerSlam (2007) for Peer Review. Please comment here, thanks. -- L A X 17:35, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Well seems like the user has stop improving the article. Should we put it up for grabs?-- TrUcO9311 ( talk) 19:00, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
An IP edited the article and removed all references to Benoit, so that "WWE would not get bad publicity. I thought it might be worthwhile to bring it up, as I recall a time when a IP Checker tracked edits to WWE Headquarters in Stanford. Just a heads-up, as if that is the case, they'll likely be back. The edit can be found here. [ [1]]. Gavyn Sykes 02:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
I just put Category:TNA Champion Belts in CFD, but I didn't see anywhere to list it for the project. Does a section exist? RobJ1981 21:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
I've added columns to the ROH World Championship, ROH World Tag Team Championship, and ROH Pure Championship showing how many times each champion(s) successfully defended the title. I thought it was appropriate since it's often brought up in ROH's storylines and is something that can easily be tracked and verified. But I thought I'd let you all know, in case you all are opposed to it or something :p Tromboneguy0186 ( talk) 10:24, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Me and LAX are teaming up to work on Survivor Series 'o7.-- TrUcO9311 ( talk) 02:48, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
I recently created a sub user page for Force One Pro Wrestling ( User:Kris Classic/Force One Pro Wrestling). I was wondering, if anybody thinks this is notable enough for me to create its own article on wiki, and any suggestions for improvements? Thanks, Kris 23:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure about notability. I'm hesitant to give an okay about moving it into mainspace until there are some reliable third party sources. That would help prove notability. Nikki 311 00:04, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
It was featured on the first page of The Atlantic City Press, would a link to that be sufficient for notability? Kris 00:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Is that a newspaper/magazine/ or what? TrUcO9311 ( talk) 00:15, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
It is a Newspaper. Kris 00:17, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Well there really aren't any other sources to take from, unless you count results from wrestling websites. Kris 00:21, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Obseessed With Wrestling is one of the only reliable wrestling results site that we accept here. You can use that. Also cite another article that you find (not in the internet but in a paper) TrUcO9311 ( talk) 00:32, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
I have added several sources. Is it sufficient? Kris 00:51, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
I have two of the six sources from other websites. About how many more would be needed? Kris 01:00, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Well, I am unable to find any more outside sources. If anybody can find any that I can use, please let me know! Kris 01:29, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Okay, I have 3 outside sources, and 7 sources in total, I am going to create the article now. Thank you Nikki and Truco for all of your help! Kris 01:45, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
~ The Chronic 00:00, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Oh hey, look... I posted the comment at exactly 00:00. Yay me! :P The Chronic 00:50, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Should this even have an article? For those who don't know, it's an unofficial title in TNA (the same way the Million Dollar Championship was in WWF) that started at the TNA Genesis 2007 PPV, and they even created a belt for it that Young wears. If it does deserve an article, it needs to be cleaned up and sourced. TJ Spyke 23:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
From what was said here, I'm going to prod it. Nikki 311 04:24, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Davnel03 has changed his username to D.M.N.. The Chronic 23:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Is there an article on a tag team which has GA status or B status. Because I want to work on the APA and I want a point of reference. TrUcO9311 ( talk) 21:47, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
The Fabulous Kangaroos is a GA. -- Scorpion 0422 03:59, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
does it really make sense to list all the brands on ppv articles (beyond wrestlemania). I mean the whole company is featured. Shouldnt it be better like the 2001 PPV articles. TrUcO9311 ( talk) 21:50, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
I'm all for each PPV being given its own page, however does that necessarily mean we have to remove the card from the non-year specific pages. IE on the WWF Vengeance page it lists the PPVs from 2001 to 2008, yet the 2007 card isn't on the page because it has been moved. I'd like to propose the idea of keeping just the results on the page as well as having the detailed article seperate, much like International cricket in 2007 shows the dates and results of the matches, then the "see also" pages give individual scorecards, descriptions squads etc. Tony2Times 02:24, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
I actually meant to keep the bare minimum results regardless of the PPV having its own year page on the basis that the specific page will have build up, show and aftermath details as well as card with bullet point details afterwards. I'm suggesting having a link to those pages but also keep a single page that lists the card and the info box for all the years of a PPV. Tony2Times ( talk) 13:26, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
I've been working on the Royal Rumble article in my sandbox. I've got the list of venues, dates, winners, entry numbers, etc. etc. all sourced, but I'm having trouble sourcing the rules, match description, and effects of the brand extension. I've got the bare bones of it done, but there are a lot of rules and exceptions to rules that aren't sourced or deleted entirely. Help! :) If anybody can help me source this information or add to it (only if you cite a reliable source or it'll get deleted) it would be much appreciated. Thanks. Nikki 311 03:18, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
I nominated Royal Rumble (1994) for a Good Article review a while back. A user began the review, but it's been 13 days and nothing more has been said. Is it acceptable to post a polite message on her talk page to ask how the review is going? I appreciate someone being willing to do the review, and I don't want to seem pushy. I'm just concerned that, after two weeks, she might have forgotten about it. Any opinions? GaryColemanFan ( talk) 03:23, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
In Your House 1 has had its FA candidate failed, with many reviewers listing a ton of problems. I would therefore like to request if several members of this project are willing to copy-edit the article for me, as there seems to be several major problems with it. Cheers, Dav nel 03 16:33, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Now that Royal Rumble (1994) has been promoted to GA status, I was wondering if anyone is waiting to nominate another pay-per-view article. I posted notice a while back that I was planning to nominate Royal Rumble (1994) and King of the Ring (1994) for GA reviews. If someone else is waiting to nominate an article that they've been working on, though, I'm willing to wait. I have very little time for Wikipedia right now, so I'm in no hurry. GaryColemanFan ( talk) 04:00, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
NEW ARTICLE, however It is not complete and is under construction and I encourage you all to come help and improve this biography stub. In case you dont know he is the upcoming debuting ECW superstar from Jamaica. TrUcO9311 ( talk) 04:18, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Does anyone know much about this site under WP:RS? It has apparently been used for the Brock Lesnar article, and a user is trying to use it for wrestler CIMA on the Australian Wrestling Federation article. I recall this site not being mentioned specifically as a "dirtsheet" during the RFC on WWE spoilers but I got the impression some users would regard it as failing WP:RS. But I just want to make sure. !! Justa Punk !! 21:12, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Could somebody else please give an unbiased opinion without the personal backchat? !! Justa Punk !! 09:23, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Yes it is a reliable source. There is stuff on things other than wrestling if you haven't noticed! The website also provides columns and TV reports that can help in articles. Anyway. I've seen a load of reliable websites have credits from PWInsider, its what one article out of 10,000 that you've picked out there. Ah, there again.... Dav nel 03 16:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Just as a note, I came across this through a WQA request. Here is my comment. The citation in question, [2], is a blog entry. Note that the entry was "posted" by a username and not a journalist, and that it was credited to a more authoritative news source. Cite _that_ source if it meets WP:V, WP:CITE, etc. (PWInsider.com). I trust that it can be met; if not, the source should not be used. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seicer ( talk • contribs) 03:09, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
This article was passed as a Good Article today. Thank you to everyone who contributed to the article and/or gave feedback. It helped quite a bit.
With that said, the reviewer did add the following: "Does require another couple of images to say, illustrate a "casket" match and the even poster would be good as other wrestling PPV articles have them. I shall pass the imaes criteria now, but may re-assess as a fail if this is not rectified."
I'm fairly sure that it would be hard to find a Free Use image of the casket match, but if anyone knows where to find a Free Use or Fair Use picture of the match, it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks again, GaryColemanFan ( talk) 22:05, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
The WWE website has some pictures that you might be able to use if you can dream up a suitable rationale. None of them are of a casket match, though. Nikki 311 22:36, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
There have been rumors posted on some news sites for the last few days of Senshi being granted his release from TNA. Allegedly, this took place on Monday. However, he has appeared at television tapings since then. If there could be someone(s) capable of clarifying on both Senshi's page and the one for the TNA roster, it would be much appreciated. Thank you. Hezekiah957 ( talk) 23:35, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
I dont know about you all, but there have been many IP edits in the past week. As you all know I created the Kofi Kingston article and an IP blanked 90% of the article, do any of you all know how to regain the original information?-- TrUcO9311 ( talk) 15:52, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
I've been trying to address concerns brought up during the Featured List nomination of IWGP World Tag Team Championship. The poster said he or she wanted the first four columns sortable. I've figured out most of the process, but I'm running into trouble. Because of the way the dates are listed, it's not sorting them correctly. It also seems to be having trouble with empty columns (for example, clicking on the "Location" box gives an empty box at the top. Clicking on it again gives the title changes in Yokohama at the top, followed by 7 empty boxes). And apparently there's supposed to be something with a "sortbottom" command, but I couldn't get it to work with that included. Would someone who understands tables well be able to look at it? The Featured List candidacy is on its 11th day, so I'm trying to address the concerns brought up before the nomination is closed. Thanks. GaryColemanFan ( talk) 21:32, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
I resized the image in the infobox for you. I set it at 150 px, but feel free to change it if you see fit. Nikki 311 02:55, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
May you all fellow Wikipedians go here for peer review. Thanks. TrUcO9311 ( talk) 05:13, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
The newsletter pages have been really quiet as of late (not a failure, but quiet). Do visit the newsletter's talk page now and then. It would help. :) The Chronic 07:23, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
I'd just like to quickly propose that uses of the word "legit" be changed to "legitimate". It reads more like an actual article and not something written by an "insider". Tnova4 ( talk) 16:16, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
As you probably know, Undertaker is the COTW. I'm proposing moving the nicknames, themes, and signature taunt lists from his main article to the Personas of The Undertaker article because the main article is so long. The discussion is HERE. Please comment and vote there. Thanks. Nikki 311 17:53, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
This article passed its Featured List nomination today. Thank you to everyone who worked on the page, and thank you to everyone who helped out with an editor's last-minute concerns. Once again, your help is appreciated. GaryColemanFan ( talk) 03:09, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Where the heck did that go? Now where do people go to see what PW articles are up for deletion? Prodded? In need of sources etc? when did this disappear and why? MPJ-DK ( talk) 05:45, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
I think this article should be nominated as a Featured List. My biggest concern is that some people don't like Featured Lists without pictures. Would it be okay to add the picture from http://www.bodyslamming.com/ajpw/pics/ajpwtriplecrown.jpg ? I don't know the origin of the picture, but it's available at a few places on the internet. GaryColemanFan ( talk) 05:48, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
I posted notice about nominating this article over a month ago. I waited to nominate it so that there wouldn't be too many wrestling pay-per-views nominated at once. After Royal Rumble (1994) passed its GA review, I inquired as to whether or not anyone else wanted to nominate a PPV. Nobody responded, so I nominated this article today. Thank you to all of the editors who helped build the article and who contributed to the peer review. As with Royal Rumble (1994), I have requested a reviewer from outside of this project to avoid accusations of conflict of interest. GaryColemanFan ( talk) 06:02, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
I need some help with the article. If anyone wants to help, I'll be grateful. Zenlax T C S 20:59, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Film at 11. Mshake3 ( talk) 05:43, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Um...... I won? Mshake3 ( talk) 00:45, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
(Oh and next time tell Justapunk to go to Request for User conduct instead of wikiquette alert.)
This user has gone to town uploading images without proper copyright information, mostly images straight from WCW or WWE that violate image policies, and putting them into the according wrestler's wiki articles. I think there is a bunch of undo-ing to be done. I would do it myself, but not sure the proper way to go about it really. Just wanted to alert the right people. Yagobo79 ( talk) 13:13, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
I know this has been asked before but which of these can be uses for as in results.
Lords of Pain | Wrestle View | Wrestling Attitude | The History of WWE | Steve's Wrestling | Online on Slaught | TWNPnews | Gerweck | Wrestling Information Archive |
and if some of these arent may you give me links to which I may use (other than Online World of Wrestling, and hoffco-inc)-- TrUcO9311 ( talk) 16:33, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
I don't think Wrestleview should be a definite "no". They are a reliable source, and have been running for over 10 years. Kris ( talk) 23:03, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Yes, and they do have sources within the WWE. Kris ( talk) 02:54, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
hello everyone! I'm back after a LOOOOONG wikibreak! How is everyone? What have I missed? The Pink Panther ( talk) 23:53, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Cheers, Feed back ☎ 00:39, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Mshake has brought up a good point in this. Is it really notable of these Legends actually being "killed"? Zenlax T C S 20:12, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
I have nominated AJPW Triple Crown Championship for Featured List status. I've seen it referred to as the most important championship in professional wrestling, and the article is well-sourced. If anyone has a chance to look it over, please feel free to do so. If you Support or Oppose the nomination, please give an explanation for your vote on the nomination page. Thanks, GaryColemanFan ( talk) 16:11, 11 December 2007 (UTC)