This page is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all
LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the
project page or contribute to the
discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale.
Increase goals?
With over 125% good and over 100% featured articles, it seems to me we ought to set new goals for these. Perhaps double for each? –
Vipz (
talk)
06:10, 14 April 2023 (UTC)reply
I agree with increasing to 800 for good articles (putting us at 64%). For featured articles, I might go with something like 125 (putting us at 81%), as the first 100 represents many years of work, and it would be good not to have the next milestone too far off in the future.--
Trystan (
talk)
22:38, 2 May 2023 (UTC)reply
That sounds good. Far away goals can be demotivating, so it makes sense to pitch for something more achievable — OwenBlacker (he/him;
Talk; please {{
ping}} me in replies)06:15, 3 May 2023 (UTC)reply
This page is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all
LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the
project page or contribute to the
discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale.
Increase goals?
With over 125% good and over 100% featured articles, it seems to me we ought to set new goals for these. Perhaps double for each? –
Vipz (
talk)
06:10, 14 April 2023 (UTC)reply
I agree with increasing to 800 for good articles (putting us at 64%). For featured articles, I might go with something like 125 (putting us at 81%), as the first 100 represents many years of work, and it would be good not to have the next milestone too far off in the future.--
Trystan (
talk)
22:38, 2 May 2023 (UTC)reply
That sounds good. Far away goals can be demotivating, so it makes sense to pitch for something more achievable — OwenBlacker (he/him;
Talk; please {{
ping}} me in replies)06:15, 3 May 2023 (UTC)reply