This talk page is not monitored by many editors. For more prompt attention, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBT studies. |
LGBT studies Project‑class | |||||||
|
Hmm... well I started doing some copyediting on this and adding ISBN's then updated the class to B before reading the the Jumpaclass page. Maybe I should've done it the other way around! Aleta 02:16, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
This is an excellent idea, by the way. I'm just struggling to find an article that I'm interested in and that I have the resources to write on hand for. Rebecca 08:55, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Do you think it would be more fair to change the points system from 1 for stub to start, 2 for start to B, and 3 for B to GA, to reflect the growing difficulty of jumping the classes? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 15:56, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
End Class | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Begin Class |
Start | B | GA | ||
Stub | 1 | 3 | 6 | ||
Start | - | 2 | 5 | ||
B | - | - | 3 |
Table of points given
for jumping from "beginning"
class to "ending" class.
What's the difference between the two sections "January" and "Jumped"? -- SatyrTN ( talk | contribs) 03:06, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
When someone gets a chance, Nicola Griffith needs a review to see how much I jumped it. I think I've only managed to jump from stub to start, though :) -- SatyrTN ( talk | contribs) 19:52, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure how to class San Francisco 2004 same-sex weddings - it's three days overdue, however, so does anyone want to take a look? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 16:26, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Well, it's been seven days. Would someone please assess the Feb 19 articles? Thank you. :) — Emiellaiendiay 05:27, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
FYI, sadly, my DSL modem died so I had only 5 days to work on San Francisco Gay Men's Chorus. Wish I could have done more! MusicMen 00:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Can new articles, rated higher than Stub initially, count as part of Jump-a-Class? I started one yesterday, which has been rated Start, and I started one in February that was rated B-class. Both were rated within a week of instigation. MusicMen 14:49, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
I noticed that San Francisco Gay Men's Chorus has been removed from the March list (originally posted for JAC consideration on March 8). If the article's not getting upgraded, will someone provide feedback or suggestions? Thanks. MusicMen 01:42, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Due to the huge backlog of stories to be reviewed for GA, so we think that taking articles from B to GA should be rethought under the one week timeframe here?? I had a B class article listed for GA status review for over three weeks until someone prodded someone to specifically look at it to do the GA review. In order to get more LGBT articles to the top of the class system, we may want to rethink the time limits on the upper level reviews... just a thought I had... jtowns 17:32, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Is there arny reason why the Gateways Club didn't jump for March?
Also the tally at the end of the Jump a class section doesn't seem to be being updated?
Fluffball70 18:38, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
I'm new to this - not sure where to put this or quite how it works (and I'm impatient, too! Reading about it doesn't audibly tell me how it happens...)
But I created several articles: Ann Bannon and her series of lesbian pulp fiction novels from 1957 - 1962 including Odd Girl Out (novel), I Am A Woman, and Women In The Shadows. I plan to write the other two articles for the books in the series within the next several days, but already Odd Girl Out got a Wiki Novels categorization as stub/low and I don't think it deserves it. Any assistance would be appreciated. (Now I have to figure out how to get back here to read any replies...) Moni3 16:26, 5 July 2007 (UTC)Moni3
I really am not sure how to improve the article further. I've used the current issue to supplement some other articles (for references), but as for this specific page, no clue...(Well maybe a picture could be taken, as long as it doesn't breach any copyright law.) Zigzig20s 18:08, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
I was looking at the fact that the points reset at the end of the year and wondering if perhaps we should instead aim to have it as a rolling 12 months, so points expire at 12 months instead of dying at the end of the calendar year. The winner at the end of each month would then choose the collaboration subject for the next month. We'd also want to keep an honour roll of monthly winners.
After all, we don't want people to stop in about October and wait until January so that their points won't expire within a couple of months... :) -- AliceJMarkham 14:56, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Suppose you decide that a new article is needed / worth adding, and you decide to create it. You could (I suppose) create a tiny article, get it rated as stub, then work on it to gain points. So, can you just create it and work it up in a week (nominating that you are doing so in advance) and then collect points? I realise the idea is to work on existing articles, but wouldn't this be a worthwhile extension? Thoughts? Jay*Jay ( talk) 12:18, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
This talk page is not monitored by many editors. For more prompt attention, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBT studies. |
LGBT studies Project‑class | |||||||
|
Hmm... well I started doing some copyediting on this and adding ISBN's then updated the class to B before reading the the Jumpaclass page. Maybe I should've done it the other way around! Aleta 02:16, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
This is an excellent idea, by the way. I'm just struggling to find an article that I'm interested in and that I have the resources to write on hand for. Rebecca 08:55, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Do you think it would be more fair to change the points system from 1 for stub to start, 2 for start to B, and 3 for B to GA, to reflect the growing difficulty of jumping the classes? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 15:56, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
End Class | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Begin Class |
Start | B | GA | ||
Stub | 1 | 3 | 6 | ||
Start | - | 2 | 5 | ||
B | - | - | 3 |
Table of points given
for jumping from "beginning"
class to "ending" class.
What's the difference between the two sections "January" and "Jumped"? -- SatyrTN ( talk | contribs) 03:06, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
When someone gets a chance, Nicola Griffith needs a review to see how much I jumped it. I think I've only managed to jump from stub to start, though :) -- SatyrTN ( talk | contribs) 19:52, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure how to class San Francisco 2004 same-sex weddings - it's three days overdue, however, so does anyone want to take a look? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 16:26, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Well, it's been seven days. Would someone please assess the Feb 19 articles? Thank you. :) — Emiellaiendiay 05:27, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
FYI, sadly, my DSL modem died so I had only 5 days to work on San Francisco Gay Men's Chorus. Wish I could have done more! MusicMen 00:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Can new articles, rated higher than Stub initially, count as part of Jump-a-Class? I started one yesterday, which has been rated Start, and I started one in February that was rated B-class. Both were rated within a week of instigation. MusicMen 14:49, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
I noticed that San Francisco Gay Men's Chorus has been removed from the March list (originally posted for JAC consideration on March 8). If the article's not getting upgraded, will someone provide feedback or suggestions? Thanks. MusicMen 01:42, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Due to the huge backlog of stories to be reviewed for GA, so we think that taking articles from B to GA should be rethought under the one week timeframe here?? I had a B class article listed for GA status review for over three weeks until someone prodded someone to specifically look at it to do the GA review. In order to get more LGBT articles to the top of the class system, we may want to rethink the time limits on the upper level reviews... just a thought I had... jtowns 17:32, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Is there arny reason why the Gateways Club didn't jump for March?
Also the tally at the end of the Jump a class section doesn't seem to be being updated?
Fluffball70 18:38, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
I'm new to this - not sure where to put this or quite how it works (and I'm impatient, too! Reading about it doesn't audibly tell me how it happens...)
But I created several articles: Ann Bannon and her series of lesbian pulp fiction novels from 1957 - 1962 including Odd Girl Out (novel), I Am A Woman, and Women In The Shadows. I plan to write the other two articles for the books in the series within the next several days, but already Odd Girl Out got a Wiki Novels categorization as stub/low and I don't think it deserves it. Any assistance would be appreciated. (Now I have to figure out how to get back here to read any replies...) Moni3 16:26, 5 July 2007 (UTC)Moni3
I really am not sure how to improve the article further. I've used the current issue to supplement some other articles (for references), but as for this specific page, no clue...(Well maybe a picture could be taken, as long as it doesn't breach any copyright law.) Zigzig20s 18:08, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
I was looking at the fact that the points reset at the end of the year and wondering if perhaps we should instead aim to have it as a rolling 12 months, so points expire at 12 months instead of dying at the end of the calendar year. The winner at the end of each month would then choose the collaboration subject for the next month. We'd also want to keep an honour roll of monthly winners.
After all, we don't want people to stop in about October and wait until January so that their points won't expire within a couple of months... :) -- AliceJMarkham 14:56, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Suppose you decide that a new article is needed / worth adding, and you decide to create it. You could (I suppose) create a tiny article, get it rated as stub, then work on it to gain points. So, can you just create it and work it up in a week (nominating that you are doing so in advance) and then collect points? I realise the idea is to work on existing articles, but wouldn't this be a worthwhile extension? Thoughts? Jay*Jay ( talk) 12:18, 17 January 2008 (UTC)