Korea NA‑class | |||||||
|
can we pare down the categories here, to maybe 4 or 5? "to create", "to translate", "need images", and everything else, under something like "to improve"? if we had a large active group of editors & articles constantly being worked on, it might make sense to triage expand/cleanup/review, but at this point, all these articles need any type of editing they can get, & it would improve the aesthetics & user-friendliness of this list & the portal, imho. Appleby 00:41, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Can someone clarify how such an article would differ in scope from hanbok?
Please do not blank redlinks for articles to be created; there is no necessity to do this if the article appears "long" to a particular editor. It must means that we, the members of WPKorea, need to work harder to create those articles, to empty the redlinks. Badagnani ( talk) 17:33, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Please do not blank redlinks for articles to be created; there is no necessity to do this if the article appears "long" to a particular editor. It must means that we, the members of WPKorea, need to work harder to create those articles, to empty the redlinks. Just chnage the dates on the entries rather than blanking, which does not enhance our encyclopedia. Badagnani ( talk) 20:21, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Please do not blank redlinks for articles to be created; there is no necessity to do this if the article appears "long" to a particular editor. It must means that we, the members of WPKorea, need to work harder to create those articles, to empty the redlinks. Just chnage the dates on the entries rather than blanking, which does not enhance our encyclopedia. Badagnani ( talk) 23:09, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
The text on how to add articles/suggestions does not in fact say HOW or where to add them! So, I'm putting my suggestion here: Tongch'on-ni ( http://www.localyte.com/places-to-visit/South%2BKorea----Tongduchon-ni ) .
Korea NA‑class | |||||||
|
can we pare down the categories here, to maybe 4 or 5? "to create", "to translate", "need images", and everything else, under something like "to improve"? if we had a large active group of editors & articles constantly being worked on, it might make sense to triage expand/cleanup/review, but at this point, all these articles need any type of editing they can get, & it would improve the aesthetics & user-friendliness of this list & the portal, imho. Appleby 00:41, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Can someone clarify how such an article would differ in scope from hanbok?
Please do not blank redlinks for articles to be created; there is no necessity to do this if the article appears "long" to a particular editor. It must means that we, the members of WPKorea, need to work harder to create those articles, to empty the redlinks. Badagnani ( talk) 17:33, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Please do not blank redlinks for articles to be created; there is no necessity to do this if the article appears "long" to a particular editor. It must means that we, the members of WPKorea, need to work harder to create those articles, to empty the redlinks. Just chnage the dates on the entries rather than blanking, which does not enhance our encyclopedia. Badagnani ( talk) 20:21, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Please do not blank redlinks for articles to be created; there is no necessity to do this if the article appears "long" to a particular editor. It must means that we, the members of WPKorea, need to work harder to create those articles, to empty the redlinks. Just chnage the dates on the entries rather than blanking, which does not enhance our encyclopedia. Badagnani ( talk) 23:09, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
The text on how to add articles/suggestions does not in fact say HOW or where to add them! So, I'm putting my suggestion here: Tongch'on-ni ( http://www.localyte.com/places-to-visit/South%2BKorea----Tongduchon-ni ) .