Home | Assessment | Cleanup | Participants | Guidelines | To do list | Talkpage | Templates | Translators |
Wine Unassessed ( inactive) | |||||||
|
WikiProject Food and drink was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 11 December 2013. |
On 18 October 2023, it was proposed that this page be moved from Wikipedia:WikiProject Wine to WikiProject:Food and drink/Wines task force. The result of the discussion was moved. |
On 18 October 2023, it was proposed that this page be moved from Wikipedia:WikiProject Wine to Wikipedia:WikiProject Food and drink/Wines task force. The result of the discussion was moved. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Pinot noir#Requested move 31 January 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. UtherSRG (talk) 11:41, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
See this discussion. Have a nice wiki. Alexmar983 ( talk) 21:48, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Reading Beans ( talk) 18:35, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Wine → Wikipedia:WikiProject Food and drink/Wines task force – I propose that this inactive drinks wikiproject be merged into WP:FOOD as a task force, same as how Cheese TF and Beverage TF are, and how other inactive wikiprojects have been converted into taskforces over time. -- 65.92.244.127 ( talk) 08:33, 18 October 2023 (UTC)— Relisting. estar8806 ( talk) ★ 18:08, 25 October 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Reading Beans ( talk) 11:43, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
The bundle move of Wikipedia:WikiProject Wine and its subpages has been reverted per WP:PMRC#3, as the target's title is unambiguously erroneous and in the wrong namespace. Under the correct title Wikipedia:WikiProject Food and drink/Wines task force, the outcome of this closed discussion may still be valid, but please leave it for a further discussion. NmWTfs85lXusaybq ( talk) 16:16, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
WP:MOSCAPS: "...only words and phrases that are consistently capitalized in a substantial majority of independent, reliable sources are capitalized in Wikipedia."
...for the record. — AjaxSmack 01:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
I edited a bit on the Clos_(vineyard) page (added a few, officially recognised, to the Champagne section). The edits raised a question, on Good Form on W'pedia: The above page, and a number of others, refer to the Comité Interprofessionel du Vin de Champagne, CIVC with its own page. But at its own page (the only External Link on the CIVC wiki page), all their publicity materials, and anywhere that I met their official representatives (and talked to / emailed with them in person), they refer to themselves as 'Comité Champagne'. There is no CIVC web site anymore. Now, would we do better to use the short name e.g., in wiki texts, or do we stick with naming them something they don't seem to want to talk about anymore at all themselves ..? And/or, how would we bulk update all references to the CIVC on all sorts of wiki pages (possibly with reference to the "CIVC" as previous designator), without collaterally destroying the proper links to the TV channel or the private investment firm of the same name? A friendly editor pointed me to this talk page for definitive answers ... Jvdvlugt ( talk) 10:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Home | Assessment | Cleanup | Participants | Guidelines | To do list | Talkpage | Templates | Translators |
Wine Unassessed ( inactive) | |||||||
|
WikiProject Food and drink was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 11 December 2013. |
On 18 October 2023, it was proposed that this page be moved from Wikipedia:WikiProject Wine to WikiProject:Food and drink/Wines task force. The result of the discussion was moved. |
On 18 October 2023, it was proposed that this page be moved from Wikipedia:WikiProject Wine to Wikipedia:WikiProject Food and drink/Wines task force. The result of the discussion was moved. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Pinot noir#Requested move 31 January 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. UtherSRG (talk) 11:41, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
See this discussion. Have a nice wiki. Alexmar983 ( talk) 21:48, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Reading Beans ( talk) 18:35, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Wine → Wikipedia:WikiProject Food and drink/Wines task force – I propose that this inactive drinks wikiproject be merged into WP:FOOD as a task force, same as how Cheese TF and Beverage TF are, and how other inactive wikiprojects have been converted into taskforces over time. -- 65.92.244.127 ( talk) 08:33, 18 October 2023 (UTC)— Relisting. estar8806 ( talk) ★ 18:08, 25 October 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Reading Beans ( talk) 11:43, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
The bundle move of Wikipedia:WikiProject Wine and its subpages has been reverted per WP:PMRC#3, as the target's title is unambiguously erroneous and in the wrong namespace. Under the correct title Wikipedia:WikiProject Food and drink/Wines task force, the outcome of this closed discussion may still be valid, but please leave it for a further discussion. NmWTfs85lXusaybq ( talk) 16:16, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
WP:MOSCAPS: "...only words and phrases that are consistently capitalized in a substantial majority of independent, reliable sources are capitalized in Wikipedia."
...for the record. — AjaxSmack 01:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
I edited a bit on the Clos_(vineyard) page (added a few, officially recognised, to the Champagne section). The edits raised a question, on Good Form on W'pedia: The above page, and a number of others, refer to the Comité Interprofessionel du Vin de Champagne, CIVC with its own page. But at its own page (the only External Link on the CIVC wiki page), all their publicity materials, and anywhere that I met their official representatives (and talked to / emailed with them in person), they refer to themselves as 'Comité Champagne'. There is no CIVC web site anymore. Now, would we do better to use the short name e.g., in wiki texts, or do we stick with naming them something they don't seem to want to talk about anymore at all themselves ..? And/or, how would we bulk update all references to the CIVC on all sorts of wiki pages (possibly with reference to the "CIVC" as previous designator), without collaterally destroying the proper links to the TV channel or the private investment firm of the same name? A friendly editor pointed me to this talk page for definitive answers ... Jvdvlugt ( talk) 10:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC)