![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | ← | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | → | Archive 30 |
![]() | Food and drink Project‑class | |||||||||||||
|
![]() | This is an archive of discussions from Q1 2013. |
What is the Russian food, viziga, referred to on page 121 of Margaret Powell's "Servants' Hall"? 204.13.204.194 ( talk) 19:56, 3 February 2013 (UTC)etjart@hotmail.com
I would welcome comments at Talk:Plantain#Proposed move. Peter coxhead ( talk) 11:39, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
By now, I have started doubting about my revert at Template:British cuisine. Is my revert correct, or was I in the wrong here? The Banner talk 15:24, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
is now being served at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nash salad. Shoulda left a note here when i saw the article. Any feedback/expertise on this salad would be welcome. Thanks Dloh cierekim 21:53, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Does the scope of the Food and Drink project include only HUMAN food and drink? I ask this because some legumes included under the Category 'Edible Legumes' are normally eaten only by animals (example: Lathyrus aphaca). However, because of this categorization they are included (incorrectly, I believe) within the scope of project Food and Drink. Unless it can be successfully argued that Category 'Edible Legumes' should include animal feed, I will go through the legumes one by one, deleting non-human foods from the Edible Legumes category, which will cause them to lose their 'Food and Drink' tag. Piedmont ( talk) 15:05, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
I see overlapping boxes on several pages. My most recent, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerber_sandwich, is not too bad, and others are worse. Should they be fixed? I don't know how. Should the originators avoid the overlaps? 20rdj04 ( talk) 04:00, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
An admin recently sent me the contents of Names for soft drinks, which was PRODded for poor sourcing and potential OR. That may sound harsh, but I can understand why, looking at it. The article just listed what soft drinks are called in countries around the world, which is great in terms of globalizing and fighting WP:BIAS, but the only sources dealt with the "pop vs. soda" debate in the United States (perhaps to a lesser extent in Canada). I don't know if it's just my bias as an American, but it seems like that issue definitely passes WP:GNG, whereas talking about names elsewhere in the world feels like an indiscriminate infodump. The way I see it, there are basically three ways I can proceed (and I do want this to stand as an article, one way or another):
I'm not 100% comfortable with any of these. What do you think? -- BDD ( talk) 17:32, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Is the proper name for the category, Category:Wine navbox templates or Category:Wine navigational boxes? I thought we were using "XXXX navigational boxes", but an editor has been renaming all of them to "XXXX navbox templates". Which is correct? 174.56.57.138 ( talk) 04:02, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Should Office québécois de la langue française be updated to account for pastagate? It did garner international attention (especially in Italy), unlike many of the other OLF gaffes. -- 65.92.180.137 ( talk) 04:20, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Sumac has been proposed to be renamed, see talk:Sumac -- 65.92.180.137 ( talk) 09:57, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 March 16 where several food related files are up for deletion -- 65.92.180.137 ( talk) 23:59, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
I was looking over at Commons, and while I may not have used the correct keywords, I was unable to find images of either a Chorleywood mixing machine or a pressure-vacuum mixer. If you have such a dough-mixing machine, can you perhaps snap a picture of it and donate it to Commons? Gzuufy ( talk) 20:05, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
I've boldly removed the quote that was previously atop the project's main page:
It is quite subjective per the personal opinion of one person, Alton Brown, and doesn't really have much to say about food and foodstuffs in and of itself. Is this quote really needed atop the page at this time? I don't believe that all journeys are "spiritual" myself. Why would they all be as such? Also, this could confer to almost anything else besides food. For example, consider: "If you search carefully, you will find good taxis all along the way." Any noun fits into this type of generic analogy. Northamerica1000 (talk) 00:20, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Sandbox • Sandbox 1 • Sandbox 2
Northamerica1000 has been making some bold changes to the Project main page. While I applaud his eagerness, this is an issue that really needs to be discussed because unlike an article, this is a page for the members of this project and individual members should consult with the project. I have asked him to please stop editing the main page and discuss the issue here be fore making any more changes ( WP:BRD). I have also asked him to use the sandbox to design any changes he wishes so he can display what he wishes to do.
Personally, I have no issue making changes to the page despite his opinion. I went through this same issue with the Beer WikiProject several years ago and we were able to come a consensus to implement a new page design. What I am asking for is a reasonable discussion per WP:BRD before whole scale changes are made based on one person's personal opinion.
Here are some of my concerns:
-- Jeremy ( blah blah • I did it!) 05:19, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
G'day All. There's a discussion at Talk:Chili burger on whether the article should be merged. Being that the article falls under your jurisdiction, you might be interested in participating. ˜ danjel [ talk | contribs ] 07:02, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Please see this project's Sandbox page for proposed layout changes to the project's main page. Many of these would be beneficial to this project to promote higher viewership and participation. Others are aesthetic changes. The following changes are proposed, as displayed on the sandbox page as of this post:
The above changes have been implemented. Over seven days have passed, and consensus here is to go with the changes. Northamerica1000 (talk) 00:30, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
file:N518484998 146142 6541.jpg (Japanese curry) has been nominated for deletion -- 65.92.180.137 ( talk) 02:16, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
May I request for a picture for Vanilla ice cream?-- Lenticel ( talk) 02:40, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
Daikon (white radish) has been proposed to be renamed, see talk:Daikon -- 65.92.180.137 ( talk) 21:35, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
file:Ma-kok.jpg has been nominated for deletino -- 65.92.180.137 ( talk) 22:57, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | ← | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | → | Archive 30 |
![]() | Food and drink Project‑class | |||||||||||||
|
![]() | This is an archive of discussions from Q1 2013. |
What is the Russian food, viziga, referred to on page 121 of Margaret Powell's "Servants' Hall"? 204.13.204.194 ( talk) 19:56, 3 February 2013 (UTC)etjart@hotmail.com
I would welcome comments at Talk:Plantain#Proposed move. Peter coxhead ( talk) 11:39, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
By now, I have started doubting about my revert at Template:British cuisine. Is my revert correct, or was I in the wrong here? The Banner talk 15:24, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
is now being served at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nash salad. Shoulda left a note here when i saw the article. Any feedback/expertise on this salad would be welcome. Thanks Dloh cierekim 21:53, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Does the scope of the Food and Drink project include only HUMAN food and drink? I ask this because some legumes included under the Category 'Edible Legumes' are normally eaten only by animals (example: Lathyrus aphaca). However, because of this categorization they are included (incorrectly, I believe) within the scope of project Food and Drink. Unless it can be successfully argued that Category 'Edible Legumes' should include animal feed, I will go through the legumes one by one, deleting non-human foods from the Edible Legumes category, which will cause them to lose their 'Food and Drink' tag. Piedmont ( talk) 15:05, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
I see overlapping boxes on several pages. My most recent, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerber_sandwich, is not too bad, and others are worse. Should they be fixed? I don't know how. Should the originators avoid the overlaps? 20rdj04 ( talk) 04:00, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
An admin recently sent me the contents of Names for soft drinks, which was PRODded for poor sourcing and potential OR. That may sound harsh, but I can understand why, looking at it. The article just listed what soft drinks are called in countries around the world, which is great in terms of globalizing and fighting WP:BIAS, but the only sources dealt with the "pop vs. soda" debate in the United States (perhaps to a lesser extent in Canada). I don't know if it's just my bias as an American, but it seems like that issue definitely passes WP:GNG, whereas talking about names elsewhere in the world feels like an indiscriminate infodump. The way I see it, there are basically three ways I can proceed (and I do want this to stand as an article, one way or another):
I'm not 100% comfortable with any of these. What do you think? -- BDD ( talk) 17:32, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Is the proper name for the category, Category:Wine navbox templates or Category:Wine navigational boxes? I thought we were using "XXXX navigational boxes", but an editor has been renaming all of them to "XXXX navbox templates". Which is correct? 174.56.57.138 ( talk) 04:02, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Should Office québécois de la langue française be updated to account for pastagate? It did garner international attention (especially in Italy), unlike many of the other OLF gaffes. -- 65.92.180.137 ( talk) 04:20, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Sumac has been proposed to be renamed, see talk:Sumac -- 65.92.180.137 ( talk) 09:57, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 March 16 where several food related files are up for deletion -- 65.92.180.137 ( talk) 23:59, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
I was looking over at Commons, and while I may not have used the correct keywords, I was unable to find images of either a Chorleywood mixing machine or a pressure-vacuum mixer. If you have such a dough-mixing machine, can you perhaps snap a picture of it and donate it to Commons? Gzuufy ( talk) 20:05, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
I've boldly removed the quote that was previously atop the project's main page:
It is quite subjective per the personal opinion of one person, Alton Brown, and doesn't really have much to say about food and foodstuffs in and of itself. Is this quote really needed atop the page at this time? I don't believe that all journeys are "spiritual" myself. Why would they all be as such? Also, this could confer to almost anything else besides food. For example, consider: "If you search carefully, you will find good taxis all along the way." Any noun fits into this type of generic analogy. Northamerica1000 (talk) 00:20, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Sandbox • Sandbox 1 • Sandbox 2
Northamerica1000 has been making some bold changes to the Project main page. While I applaud his eagerness, this is an issue that really needs to be discussed because unlike an article, this is a page for the members of this project and individual members should consult with the project. I have asked him to please stop editing the main page and discuss the issue here be fore making any more changes ( WP:BRD). I have also asked him to use the sandbox to design any changes he wishes so he can display what he wishes to do.
Personally, I have no issue making changes to the page despite his opinion. I went through this same issue with the Beer WikiProject several years ago and we were able to come a consensus to implement a new page design. What I am asking for is a reasonable discussion per WP:BRD before whole scale changes are made based on one person's personal opinion.
Here are some of my concerns:
-- Jeremy ( blah blah • I did it!) 05:19, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
G'day All. There's a discussion at Talk:Chili burger on whether the article should be merged. Being that the article falls under your jurisdiction, you might be interested in participating. ˜ danjel [ talk | contribs ] 07:02, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Please see this project's Sandbox page for proposed layout changes to the project's main page. Many of these would be beneficial to this project to promote higher viewership and participation. Others are aesthetic changes. The following changes are proposed, as displayed on the sandbox page as of this post:
The above changes have been implemented. Over seven days have passed, and consensus here is to go with the changes. Northamerica1000 (talk) 00:30, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
file:N518484998 146142 6541.jpg (Japanese curry) has been nominated for deletion -- 65.92.180.137 ( talk) 02:16, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
May I request for a picture for Vanilla ice cream?-- Lenticel ( talk) 02:40, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
Daikon (white radish) has been proposed to be renamed, see talk:Daikon -- 65.92.180.137 ( talk) 21:35, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
file:Ma-kok.jpg has been nominated for deletino -- 65.92.180.137 ( talk) 22:57, 31 March 2013 (UTC)