College football Project‑class | |||||||
|
I had this on the main page talk page, but it was buried under a previous lengthy discussion and didn't get any responses, so I moved it here.--
NMajdan•
talk
18:39, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
I came across a template the NFL uses at the top of its Season-by-Season records. {{
Start NFL SBS}} is the template and it uses {{
end box}} at the end of the table. You can see it here. We could use something similar to this at the top of our schedule. That way every schedule will be formatted the same. Look at these templates as well: {{
Start game list}} and {{
Sports game}}. We could make our own versions of those.--NMajdan•talk 18:47, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
The 2006 Colorado Buffaloes football team page got hit by the Fair Use folks (I use folks generously). See the history page: [1]. They bascically removed all images. I could see removing the logos, but promotional images? Aren't those under a difference fair use category? -- MECU≈ talk 18:46, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
I took a good hard swipe, with my reasoning explained in the Discussion page ( Talk:2006 Colorado Buffaloes football team). Remember to be sure that all the college logos you use are appropriately licensed (some are not, I fixed all the logos in that article to have {{Univ-logo}}), and be sure to have the rationale discussed on the talk page of the article to at least give yourself some breathing space. Steal my rationales if you want. If you have any questions, I'll watch this page. -- Bobak 22:47, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
This is not my interpretation fair use, this is Wikipedia's policy for unfree images. You guys may disagree with it, but this project is free as in speech, not free as in beer. ed g2s • talk 00:01, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Just off the top of my head, there was Talk:NHL Entry Draft. ed g2s • talk 02:56, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
I am responding to the following posted on [[ this page: Jimbo Wales' statement
Dispute resolution: Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-08-01 Fair Use Images on Sports Page - College Football Specific -- MECU≈ talk 13:37, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
I'm going to attempt to add all the relative links on this topic from the various locations they have occured. If you find of or know of others, please add them to the list. Please make the link go directly there, and junotest just to the page. Please centralize all discussions here. -- MECU≈ talk 01:03, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
I have seen several year pages with additional fields in the chart, such as attendance and BCS ranking. Why is the coaches poll the only one that is listed? AP and BCS should be included. Other interesting fields could include opponent's end ranking (in one or more of the polls) and the highest ranking an opponent had during the course of the season. These fields would be interesting to see how good or bad a team truly did, since losing to an unranked team looks a lot better when it shows that team ended the season in the top 10. However, adding these fields could make it a bit long and I could live without them, however I still think they would be interesting. Also, I have seen some pages under "ranking" put ranks past the top 25, since one can extrapolate their rank if any votes are received for them in the polls. I am fine with this, but it should be done for all year pages and not just some if done at all, and a note should be included explaining how one can extrapolate the rankings past the top 25 if any votes are given to a team. In the "Opponent" section I have seen teams put an "@" symbol for away games in front of the name, this doesn't specify if you should do that or not. It also doesn't specify if you should add a rank in front of an opponent if they are ranked, and doesn't specify which poll to use for that rank if that is to be included. Lastly, there should be a double dagger or some other symbol to represent a bowl game. Thoughts? VegaDark 19:01, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
I think it should look like the following:
Date | Time | Opponent | AP# | Coaches# | BCS# | Location | TV | Attendance | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
08/31/2006* | 7:00 p.m. | Eastern Washington | RV | RV | N/A | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | FSN NW | 50,000 | W 56-17 |
09/07/2006* | 4:30 p.m. | @ Boise State | RV | RV | N/A | Bronco Stadium · Boise, Idaho | ESPN | 50,000 | L 14-42 |
09/23/2006* | 7:15 p.m. | Idaho | NR | NR | N/A | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | FSN NW | 50,000 | W 38-0 |
09/30/2006 | 1:05 p.m. | #20 California | NR | NR | N/A | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | 50,000 | L 13-41 | |
10/07/2006 | 4:00 p.m. | Washington State | NR | NR | N/A | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | FSN NW | 50,000 | L 6-13 |
10/14/2006 | 3:30 p.m. | @ Washington | NR | NR | N/A | Husky Stadium · Seattle, Washington | FSN NW | 50,000 | W 27-17 |
10/21/2006 | 4:00 p.m. | @ Arizona | NR | NR | NR | Arizona Stadium · Tucson, Arizona | 50,000 | W 17-10 | |
10/28/2006 | 12:30 p.m. | #2 USC | NR | NR | NR | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | FSN | 50,000 | W 33-31 |
11/04/2006† | 1:05 p.m. | Arizona State | RV | RV | NR | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | 50,000 | W 44-10 | |
11/11/2006 | 3:15 p.m. | @ UCLA | RV | RV | #24 | Rose Bowl · Pasadena, California | FSN Prime Ticket | 50,000 | L 7-25 |
11/18/2006 | 12:30 p.m. | @ Stanford | NR | NR | NR | Stanford Stadium · Stanford, California | FSN NW | 49 | W 30-7 |
11/24/2006 | 12:30 p.m. | Oregon | RV | RV | NR | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | FSN | 50,000 | W 30-28 |
12/02/2006* | 9:00 p.m. | @ #23 Hawaii | RV | RV | #24 | Aloha Stadium · Honolulu, Hawaii | ESPN | 50,000 | W 35-32 |
12/29/2006‡ | 11:00 p.m. | vs. Missouri | #24 | #25 | #22 | Sun Bowl Stadium · El Paso, Texas | CBS | TBA | W 117-0 |
*Non-Conference Game †Homecoming ‡Bowl Game #Poll rankings released prior to game. NR = Not ranked, RV = Received votes. All times Pacific Standard Time ( UTC-8) and subject to change. |
Note the following changes: Addition of BCS poll, AP poll, and attendance columns. Bowl game color changed. "Site" changed to "Location". NR and RV used, double dagger symbol used for bowl games, lower case a.m. and p.m. (think that is the correct way of writing them), and "vs." is used before bowl game opponents to show it is played at a neutral location. Opponents should wikilink to their football team (or season article if it exists) but I didn't bother. Personally I think this looks a lot better and includes more useful information than currently, and doesn't look too cluttered. If people disagree perhaps we could take a straw poll on each change on the main college football wikiproject talk page. VegaDark 04:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
(reset)Sounds like we're pretty far apart in coming to a consensus. I'll list all the areas of contention below and try to align them with what I think people want to get a more visual sense of how far we are. Perhaps if someone is alone in thinking one way they can give it up in the sense to get the more agreed upon items by others. If I mis-placed your name, please fix it by all means (and I'm sorry, it wasn't intentional). If I was right, replace with ~~~ so we'll know you approved (it will change to your signature name then). -- MECU≈ talk 17:44, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
I do hope nobody minds, but I added myself to the opinions above. I hadn't noticed this before, but I will now participate in discussion regarding the yearly team page formats. In all honesty, I do think that the BCS should be added if and only if the team is rated in the BCS standings. There's no point in having nobody-teams having 'N/A' the entire year in their boxes.... if this is possible, of course. -- Nomader Talk 22:54, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Date | Time | Opponent | AP# | Coaches# | Location | TV | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
08/31/2006* | 7:00 p.m. | Eastern Washington | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | FSN NW | W 56-17 | ||||
09/07/2006* | 4:30 p.m. | @ #22/#25 Boise State | Bronco Stadium · Boise, Idaho | ESPN | L 14-42 | ||||
09/23/2006* | 7:15 p.m. | Idaho | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | FSN NW | W 38-0 | ||||
09/30/2006 | 1:05 p.m. | #15/#20 California | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | L 13-41 | |||||
10/07/2006 | 4:00 p.m. | Washington State | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | FSN NW | L 6-13 | ||||
10/14/2006 | 3:30 p.m. | @ Washington | Husky Stadium · Seattle, Washington | FSN NW | W 27-17 | ||||
10/21/2006 | 4:00 p.m. | @ Arizona | Arizona Stadium · Tucson, Arizona | W 17-10 | |||||
10/28/2006 | 12:30 p.m. | #2/#2 USC | #25 | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | FSN | W 33-31 | |||
11/04/2006† | 1:05 p.m. | Arizona State | #25 | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | W 44-10 | ||||
11/11/2006 | 3:15 p.m. | @ #15/#16 UCLA | #24 | #24 | Rose Bowl · Pasadena, California | FSN Prime Ticket | L 7-25 | ||
11/18/2006 | 12:30 p.m. | @ Stanford | Stanford Stadium · Stanford, California | FSN NW | W 30-7 | ||||
11/24/2006 | 12:30 p.m. | Oregon | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | FSN | W 30-28 | ||||
12/02/2006* | 9:00 p.m. | @ #22/#23 Hawaii | Aloha Stadium · Honolulu, Hawaii | ESPN | W 35-32 | ||||
12/29/2006‡ | 11:00 p.m. | Missouri | #24 | #25 | Sun Bowl Stadium · El Paso, Texas | CBS | W 117-0 | ||
*Non-Conference Game †Homecoming ‡Bowl Game #Poll rankings released prior to game. All times Pacific Standard Time ( UTC-8) and subject to change. |
For the opponents, the first # is AP, second is Coaches. -- MECU≈ talk 16:17, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
I hate to bring up another question, but if we make the table larger, or even if we don't, what is everyone's opinion on making the text inside the table smaller?
Date | Time | Opponent | AP# | Coaches# | Location | TV | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
08/31/2006* | 7:00 p.m. | Eastern Washington | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | FSN NW | W 56-17 | ||||
09/30/2006 | 1:05 p.m. | #15/#20 California | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | L 13-41 | |||||
10/07/2006 | 4:00 p.m. | Washington State | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | FSN NW | L 6-13 | ||||
10/14/2006 | 3:30 p.m. | @ Washington | Husky Stadium · Seattle, Washington | FSN NW | W 27-17 | ||||
10/21/2006 | 4:00 p.m. | @ Arizona | Arizona Stadium · Tucson, Arizona | W 17-10 | |||||
10/28/2006 | 12:30 p.m. | #2/#2 USC | #25 | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | FSN | W 33-31 | |||
11/04/2006† | 1:05 p.m. | Arizona State | #25 | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | W 44-10 | ||||
*Non-Conference Game †Homecoming ‡Bowl Game #Poll rankings released prior to game. All times Pacific Standard Time ( UTC-8) and subject to change. |
Just another suggestion.-- NMajdan• talk 18:56, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Date | Time | Opponent | AP# | Coaches# | Location | TV | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
08/31/2006* | 7:00 p.m. | Eastern Washington | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | FSN NW | W 56-17 | ||||
09/30/2006 | 1:05 p.m. | #15/#20 California | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | L 13-41 | |||||
10/07/2006 | 4:00 p.m. | Washington State | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | FSN NW | L 6-13 | ||||
10/14/2006 | 3:30 p.m. | @ Washington | Husky Stadium · Seattle, Washington | FSN NW | W 27-17 | ||||
10/21/2006 | 4:00 p.m. | @ Arizona | Arizona Stadium · Tucson, Arizona | W 17-10 | |||||
10/28/2006 | 12:30 p.m. | #2/#2 USC | #25 | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | FSN | W 33-31 | |||
11/04/2006† | 1:05 p.m. | Arizona State | #25 | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | W 44-10 | ||||
*Non-Conference Game †Homecoming ‡Bowl Game #Poll rankings released prior to game. All times Pacific Standard Time ( UTC-8) and subject to change. |
Also, "Optional" cannot mean don't put it unless they are ranked, that's what Mandatory means. Optional was intended to mean if someone wanted to put it on a page, then they could, but weren't required to do so... but I regret even putting that option up there now. Ohwell. -- MECU≈ talk 19:21, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Regarding the current discusion
Other randon thoughts:
Thanks for listening. AUTiger ʃ talk/ work 05:57, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
I've seen different ways of labeling the "Opponent" section name. Some pages use: "University of Michigan", others use "Michigan" or "Week 1: Michigan" and others might use "Michigan Wolverines". I'd like to propose that just "Michigan" be used. I believe "University of ..." is too formal, "Week 1:" is semi-redundant (it only becomes semi-useful when they have a bye week, but is seeing "Week 1:" and then "Week 4:" really useful? The text should describe if they have a layoff). Any comments? -- MECU≈ talk 17:36, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
What, if any, place does a team roster have on the yearly team pages?
See example: DAWGinRoswell Dawginroswell ( talk) 22:20, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
2007 Georgia Bulldogs by Position [1] | ||||||
Quarterbacks
|
Offensive Line
Defensive Line
|
Linebackers
|
Safeties
Punters
Long Snappers
|
Should this template change {{ Linescore Amfootball}} to {{ AFB game box start}}? - AllisonFoley ( talk) 00:13, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
@ Cbl62:, @ Jweiss11: according to this game summaries should be prose. Does that mean that we should work to remove game boxes, example current version of North Carolina?- UCO2009bluejay ( talk) 22:17, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
College football Project‑class | |||||||
|
I had this on the main page talk page, but it was buried under a previous lengthy discussion and didn't get any responses, so I moved it here.--
NMajdan•
talk
18:39, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
I came across a template the NFL uses at the top of its Season-by-Season records. {{
Start NFL SBS}} is the template and it uses {{
end box}} at the end of the table. You can see it here. We could use something similar to this at the top of our schedule. That way every schedule will be formatted the same. Look at these templates as well: {{
Start game list}} and {{
Sports game}}. We could make our own versions of those.--NMajdan•talk 18:47, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
The 2006 Colorado Buffaloes football team page got hit by the Fair Use folks (I use folks generously). See the history page: [1]. They bascically removed all images. I could see removing the logos, but promotional images? Aren't those under a difference fair use category? -- MECU≈ talk 18:46, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
I took a good hard swipe, with my reasoning explained in the Discussion page ( Talk:2006 Colorado Buffaloes football team). Remember to be sure that all the college logos you use are appropriately licensed (some are not, I fixed all the logos in that article to have {{Univ-logo}}), and be sure to have the rationale discussed on the talk page of the article to at least give yourself some breathing space. Steal my rationales if you want. If you have any questions, I'll watch this page. -- Bobak 22:47, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
This is not my interpretation fair use, this is Wikipedia's policy for unfree images. You guys may disagree with it, but this project is free as in speech, not free as in beer. ed g2s • talk 00:01, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Just off the top of my head, there was Talk:NHL Entry Draft. ed g2s • talk 02:56, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
I am responding to the following posted on [[ this page: Jimbo Wales' statement
Dispute resolution: Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-08-01 Fair Use Images on Sports Page - College Football Specific -- MECU≈ talk 13:37, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
I'm going to attempt to add all the relative links on this topic from the various locations they have occured. If you find of or know of others, please add them to the list. Please make the link go directly there, and junotest just to the page. Please centralize all discussions here. -- MECU≈ talk 01:03, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
I have seen several year pages with additional fields in the chart, such as attendance and BCS ranking. Why is the coaches poll the only one that is listed? AP and BCS should be included. Other interesting fields could include opponent's end ranking (in one or more of the polls) and the highest ranking an opponent had during the course of the season. These fields would be interesting to see how good or bad a team truly did, since losing to an unranked team looks a lot better when it shows that team ended the season in the top 10. However, adding these fields could make it a bit long and I could live without them, however I still think they would be interesting. Also, I have seen some pages under "ranking" put ranks past the top 25, since one can extrapolate their rank if any votes are received for them in the polls. I am fine with this, but it should be done for all year pages and not just some if done at all, and a note should be included explaining how one can extrapolate the rankings past the top 25 if any votes are given to a team. In the "Opponent" section I have seen teams put an "@" symbol for away games in front of the name, this doesn't specify if you should do that or not. It also doesn't specify if you should add a rank in front of an opponent if they are ranked, and doesn't specify which poll to use for that rank if that is to be included. Lastly, there should be a double dagger or some other symbol to represent a bowl game. Thoughts? VegaDark 19:01, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
I think it should look like the following:
Date | Time | Opponent | AP# | Coaches# | BCS# | Location | TV | Attendance | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
08/31/2006* | 7:00 p.m. | Eastern Washington | RV | RV | N/A | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | FSN NW | 50,000 | W 56-17 |
09/07/2006* | 4:30 p.m. | @ Boise State | RV | RV | N/A | Bronco Stadium · Boise, Idaho | ESPN | 50,000 | L 14-42 |
09/23/2006* | 7:15 p.m. | Idaho | NR | NR | N/A | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | FSN NW | 50,000 | W 38-0 |
09/30/2006 | 1:05 p.m. | #20 California | NR | NR | N/A | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | 50,000 | L 13-41 | |
10/07/2006 | 4:00 p.m. | Washington State | NR | NR | N/A | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | FSN NW | 50,000 | L 6-13 |
10/14/2006 | 3:30 p.m. | @ Washington | NR | NR | N/A | Husky Stadium · Seattle, Washington | FSN NW | 50,000 | W 27-17 |
10/21/2006 | 4:00 p.m. | @ Arizona | NR | NR | NR | Arizona Stadium · Tucson, Arizona | 50,000 | W 17-10 | |
10/28/2006 | 12:30 p.m. | #2 USC | NR | NR | NR | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | FSN | 50,000 | W 33-31 |
11/04/2006† | 1:05 p.m. | Arizona State | RV | RV | NR | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | 50,000 | W 44-10 | |
11/11/2006 | 3:15 p.m. | @ UCLA | RV | RV | #24 | Rose Bowl · Pasadena, California | FSN Prime Ticket | 50,000 | L 7-25 |
11/18/2006 | 12:30 p.m. | @ Stanford | NR | NR | NR | Stanford Stadium · Stanford, California | FSN NW | 49 | W 30-7 |
11/24/2006 | 12:30 p.m. | Oregon | RV | RV | NR | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | FSN | 50,000 | W 30-28 |
12/02/2006* | 9:00 p.m. | @ #23 Hawaii | RV | RV | #24 | Aloha Stadium · Honolulu, Hawaii | ESPN | 50,000 | W 35-32 |
12/29/2006‡ | 11:00 p.m. | vs. Missouri | #24 | #25 | #22 | Sun Bowl Stadium · El Paso, Texas | CBS | TBA | W 117-0 |
*Non-Conference Game †Homecoming ‡Bowl Game #Poll rankings released prior to game. NR = Not ranked, RV = Received votes. All times Pacific Standard Time ( UTC-8) and subject to change. |
Note the following changes: Addition of BCS poll, AP poll, and attendance columns. Bowl game color changed. "Site" changed to "Location". NR and RV used, double dagger symbol used for bowl games, lower case a.m. and p.m. (think that is the correct way of writing them), and "vs." is used before bowl game opponents to show it is played at a neutral location. Opponents should wikilink to their football team (or season article if it exists) but I didn't bother. Personally I think this looks a lot better and includes more useful information than currently, and doesn't look too cluttered. If people disagree perhaps we could take a straw poll on each change on the main college football wikiproject talk page. VegaDark 04:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
(reset)Sounds like we're pretty far apart in coming to a consensus. I'll list all the areas of contention below and try to align them with what I think people want to get a more visual sense of how far we are. Perhaps if someone is alone in thinking one way they can give it up in the sense to get the more agreed upon items by others. If I mis-placed your name, please fix it by all means (and I'm sorry, it wasn't intentional). If I was right, replace with ~~~ so we'll know you approved (it will change to your signature name then). -- MECU≈ talk 17:44, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
I do hope nobody minds, but I added myself to the opinions above. I hadn't noticed this before, but I will now participate in discussion regarding the yearly team page formats. In all honesty, I do think that the BCS should be added if and only if the team is rated in the BCS standings. There's no point in having nobody-teams having 'N/A' the entire year in their boxes.... if this is possible, of course. -- Nomader Talk 22:54, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Date | Time | Opponent | AP# | Coaches# | Location | TV | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
08/31/2006* | 7:00 p.m. | Eastern Washington | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | FSN NW | W 56-17 | ||||
09/07/2006* | 4:30 p.m. | @ #22/#25 Boise State | Bronco Stadium · Boise, Idaho | ESPN | L 14-42 | ||||
09/23/2006* | 7:15 p.m. | Idaho | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | FSN NW | W 38-0 | ||||
09/30/2006 | 1:05 p.m. | #15/#20 California | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | L 13-41 | |||||
10/07/2006 | 4:00 p.m. | Washington State | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | FSN NW | L 6-13 | ||||
10/14/2006 | 3:30 p.m. | @ Washington | Husky Stadium · Seattle, Washington | FSN NW | W 27-17 | ||||
10/21/2006 | 4:00 p.m. | @ Arizona | Arizona Stadium · Tucson, Arizona | W 17-10 | |||||
10/28/2006 | 12:30 p.m. | #2/#2 USC | #25 | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | FSN | W 33-31 | |||
11/04/2006† | 1:05 p.m. | Arizona State | #25 | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | W 44-10 | ||||
11/11/2006 | 3:15 p.m. | @ #15/#16 UCLA | #24 | #24 | Rose Bowl · Pasadena, California | FSN Prime Ticket | L 7-25 | ||
11/18/2006 | 12:30 p.m. | @ Stanford | Stanford Stadium · Stanford, California | FSN NW | W 30-7 | ||||
11/24/2006 | 12:30 p.m. | Oregon | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | FSN | W 30-28 | ||||
12/02/2006* | 9:00 p.m. | @ #22/#23 Hawaii | Aloha Stadium · Honolulu, Hawaii | ESPN | W 35-32 | ||||
12/29/2006‡ | 11:00 p.m. | Missouri | #24 | #25 | Sun Bowl Stadium · El Paso, Texas | CBS | W 117-0 | ||
*Non-Conference Game †Homecoming ‡Bowl Game #Poll rankings released prior to game. All times Pacific Standard Time ( UTC-8) and subject to change. |
For the opponents, the first # is AP, second is Coaches. -- MECU≈ talk 16:17, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
I hate to bring up another question, but if we make the table larger, or even if we don't, what is everyone's opinion on making the text inside the table smaller?
Date | Time | Opponent | AP# | Coaches# | Location | TV | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
08/31/2006* | 7:00 p.m. | Eastern Washington | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | FSN NW | W 56-17 | ||||
09/30/2006 | 1:05 p.m. | #15/#20 California | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | L 13-41 | |||||
10/07/2006 | 4:00 p.m. | Washington State | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | FSN NW | L 6-13 | ||||
10/14/2006 | 3:30 p.m. | @ Washington | Husky Stadium · Seattle, Washington | FSN NW | W 27-17 | ||||
10/21/2006 | 4:00 p.m. | @ Arizona | Arizona Stadium · Tucson, Arizona | W 17-10 | |||||
10/28/2006 | 12:30 p.m. | #2/#2 USC | #25 | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | FSN | W 33-31 | |||
11/04/2006† | 1:05 p.m. | Arizona State | #25 | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | W 44-10 | ||||
*Non-Conference Game †Homecoming ‡Bowl Game #Poll rankings released prior to game. All times Pacific Standard Time ( UTC-8) and subject to change. |
Just another suggestion.-- NMajdan• talk 18:56, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Date | Time | Opponent | AP# | Coaches# | Location | TV | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
08/31/2006* | 7:00 p.m. | Eastern Washington | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | FSN NW | W 56-17 | ||||
09/30/2006 | 1:05 p.m. | #15/#20 California | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | L 13-41 | |||||
10/07/2006 | 4:00 p.m. | Washington State | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | FSN NW | L 6-13 | ||||
10/14/2006 | 3:30 p.m. | @ Washington | Husky Stadium · Seattle, Washington | FSN NW | W 27-17 | ||||
10/21/2006 | 4:00 p.m. | @ Arizona | Arizona Stadium · Tucson, Arizona | W 17-10 | |||||
10/28/2006 | 12:30 p.m. | #2/#2 USC | #25 | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | FSN | W 33-31 | |||
11/04/2006† | 1:05 p.m. | Arizona State | #25 | Reser Stadium · Corvallis, Oregon | W 44-10 | ||||
*Non-Conference Game †Homecoming ‡Bowl Game #Poll rankings released prior to game. All times Pacific Standard Time ( UTC-8) and subject to change. |
Also, "Optional" cannot mean don't put it unless they are ranked, that's what Mandatory means. Optional was intended to mean if someone wanted to put it on a page, then they could, but weren't required to do so... but I regret even putting that option up there now. Ohwell. -- MECU≈ talk 19:21, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Regarding the current discusion
Other randon thoughts:
Thanks for listening. AUTiger ʃ talk/ work 05:57, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
I've seen different ways of labeling the "Opponent" section name. Some pages use: "University of Michigan", others use "Michigan" or "Week 1: Michigan" and others might use "Michigan Wolverines". I'd like to propose that just "Michigan" be used. I believe "University of ..." is too formal, "Week 1:" is semi-redundant (it only becomes semi-useful when they have a bye week, but is seeing "Week 1:" and then "Week 4:" really useful? The text should describe if they have a layoff). Any comments? -- MECU≈ talk 17:36, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
What, if any, place does a team roster have on the yearly team pages?
See example: DAWGinRoswell Dawginroswell ( talk) 22:20, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
2007 Georgia Bulldogs by Position [1] | ||||||
Quarterbacks
|
Offensive Line
Defensive Line
|
Linebackers
|
Safeties
Punters
Long Snappers
|
Should this template change {{ Linescore Amfootball}} to {{ AFB game box start}}? - AllisonFoley ( talk) 00:13, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
@ Cbl62:, @ Jweiss11: according to this game summaries should be prose. Does that mean that we should work to remove game boxes, example current version of North Carolina?- UCO2009bluejay ( talk) 22:17, 24 September 2023 (UTC)