|
This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||
|
WikiProject Academic Journals was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 21 November 2011. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 120 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
See Open peer review and ScienceOpen. Do we treat them the same way as we do traditional peer review? Doug Weller talk 13:42, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Acta zool. cracov. is on the list of most-cited journals that don't have an article, in the top 10. However in trying to remedy the missing page I found barely anything independent about it, not even a list of places it's indexed. Has anyone else tried to document this before and ran into the same issues I've had? (For anyone interested, I've made a draft: Draft:Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia) Recon rabbit 20:55, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
I think editors are needed to take a look at recent edits at Journal of Health Psychology and see what should be considered acceptable. An enthusiastic IP has made some edits in good faith, adding links to Special issues [4] and Special collections [5]. But these types of edits are not usually acceptable in Academic Journal articles.
Also, is it necessary to explicitly quote and retain these remarks pertaining to a controversy about the journal? [6]. --- Steve Quinn ( talk) 14:57, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
This AFD could use some input from knowledgeable editors. -- Randykitty ( talk) 08:57, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
This one, too. -- Randykitty ( talk) 00:04, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:TACL#Requested move 12 March 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Brusquedandelion ( talk) 01:08, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
If people could comment on this, that would be great. It's an obvious case IMO but people are bringing weird arguments into it. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 23:40, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
I started an article on the journal Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases, based on a translation from the German Wikipedia. I have a question about the ISO 4 abbreviation. Should the B of borne in the abbreviation be a cap, as it is in the German Wikipedia? Also, the impact factor from 2014 is out of date, but I don't know where to find a more current value. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 16:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
There is a content disagreement on this article's talk page concerning the section on its academic journal Occupational Health Science. The issue is discussed in this section of the article's talk page. The participation of knowledgeable editors would be welcome. -- Randykitty ( talk) 18:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Some of you may have some thoughts on the proposed bot task. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 20:11, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
|
This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||
|
WikiProject Academic Journals was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 21 November 2011. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 120 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
See Open peer review and ScienceOpen. Do we treat them the same way as we do traditional peer review? Doug Weller talk 13:42, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Acta zool. cracov. is on the list of most-cited journals that don't have an article, in the top 10. However in trying to remedy the missing page I found barely anything independent about it, not even a list of places it's indexed. Has anyone else tried to document this before and ran into the same issues I've had? (For anyone interested, I've made a draft: Draft:Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia) Recon rabbit 20:55, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
I think editors are needed to take a look at recent edits at Journal of Health Psychology and see what should be considered acceptable. An enthusiastic IP has made some edits in good faith, adding links to Special issues [4] and Special collections [5]. But these types of edits are not usually acceptable in Academic Journal articles.
Also, is it necessary to explicitly quote and retain these remarks pertaining to a controversy about the journal? [6]. --- Steve Quinn ( talk) 14:57, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
This AFD could use some input from knowledgeable editors. -- Randykitty ( talk) 08:57, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
This one, too. -- Randykitty ( talk) 00:04, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:TACL#Requested move 12 March 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Brusquedandelion ( talk) 01:08, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
If people could comment on this, that would be great. It's an obvious case IMO but people are bringing weird arguments into it. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 23:40, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
I started an article on the journal Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases, based on a translation from the German Wikipedia. I have a question about the ISO 4 abbreviation. Should the B of borne in the abbreviation be a cap, as it is in the German Wikipedia? Also, the impact factor from 2014 is out of date, but I don't know where to find a more current value. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 16:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
There is a content disagreement on this article's talk page concerning the section on its academic journal Occupational Health Science. The issue is discussed in this section of the article's talk page. The participation of knowledgeable editors would be welcome. -- Randykitty ( talk) 18:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Some of you may have some thoughts on the proposed bot task. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 20:11, 19 May 2024 (UTC)