Policy | Technical | Proposals | Idea lab | WMF | Miscellaneous |
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
According to Wikipedia:Article titles (policy), "article titles are written using the English language". Why, then, are there over 200 articles with the title written in Chinese characters? See Category:Disambiguation pages with Chinese character titles. WWGB ( talk) 07:25, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
@
Pecopteris when you wrote remove content that is illegal or discusses things that are illegal like CP
, what were you referring to? I assume it wasn't
WP:CP.
RoySmith
(talk)
19:24, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
The redirect
Wikipedia:VPP has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 9 § Wikipedia:VPP until a consensus is reached. —Matr1x-101 (Ping me when replying) {
user page
(@ commons) -
talk}
14:54, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia talk:Village pump (proposals)#Looking for some unofficial clerks. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 16:05, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
So I'm here trying to figure out where to hold s discussion that spun off from an ANI thread on how information about active tropical cyclones (Hurricanes, typhoons etc) should be handled per WP:NOTNEWS and MOS:CURRENT. Between my own comments and those from others, there have been at least four different suggestions on where to hold the discussion, with the latest suggestion being this page. This page seems to be more about changes to policy but some discussions here do seem to be about application. Where ever it is held, this discussion would involve changes to long-standing practices within a WikiProject. TornadoLGS ( talk) 02:08, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The header for this Village pump begins with these words:
The policy section of the village pump is used to discuss already proposed policies and guidelines and to discuss changes to existing policies and guidelines.
A few editors seem to think that this means editors should not discuss changes to existing policies and guidelines on the talk pages of those same policies and guidelines (the talk pages that say, at their tops, things like "This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the What Wikipedia is not page").
If you are interested in this, please see Wikipedia talk:Policies and guidelines#Venue. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 00:11, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Please advise on why official sources such as Airlines and Airport websites cant be used when adding information to Wikipedia.
Using Indepandant sources provides incorrect information. For example using a outdated article from clare fm saying Shannon- Paris is ending in October. Which is wrong because the official Airline and airport site state its NOT.
Wikipedia is supposed to be reliable source providing old links like that is wrong and unrelibale. Please allow official sites be used AVGEEK7813 ( talk) 09:23, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
straightforward, descriptive statements of factslike whether that airport has certain flights. – Joe ( talk) 10:13, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Policy | Technical | Proposals | Idea lab | WMF | Miscellaneous |
![]() |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
According to Wikipedia:Article titles (policy), "article titles are written using the English language". Why, then, are there over 200 articles with the title written in Chinese characters? See Category:Disambiguation pages with Chinese character titles. WWGB ( talk) 07:25, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
@
Pecopteris when you wrote remove content that is illegal or discusses things that are illegal like CP
, what were you referring to? I assume it wasn't
WP:CP.
RoySmith
(talk)
19:24, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
The redirect
Wikipedia:VPP has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 9 § Wikipedia:VPP until a consensus is reached. —Matr1x-101 (Ping me when replying) {
user page
(@ commons) -
talk}
14:54, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia talk:Village pump (proposals)#Looking for some unofficial clerks. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 16:05, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
So I'm here trying to figure out where to hold s discussion that spun off from an ANI thread on how information about active tropical cyclones (Hurricanes, typhoons etc) should be handled per WP:NOTNEWS and MOS:CURRENT. Between my own comments and those from others, there have been at least four different suggestions on where to hold the discussion, with the latest suggestion being this page. This page seems to be more about changes to policy but some discussions here do seem to be about application. Where ever it is held, this discussion would involve changes to long-standing practices within a WikiProject. TornadoLGS ( talk) 02:08, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
The header for this Village pump begins with these words:
The policy section of the village pump is used to discuss already proposed policies and guidelines and to discuss changes to existing policies and guidelines.
A few editors seem to think that this means editors should not discuss changes to existing policies and guidelines on the talk pages of those same policies and guidelines (the talk pages that say, at their tops, things like "This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the What Wikipedia is not page").
If you are interested in this, please see Wikipedia talk:Policies and guidelines#Venue. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 00:11, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Please advise on why official sources such as Airlines and Airport websites cant be used when adding information to Wikipedia.
Using Indepandant sources provides incorrect information. For example using a outdated article from clare fm saying Shannon- Paris is ending in October. Which is wrong because the official Airline and airport site state its NOT.
Wikipedia is supposed to be reliable source providing old links like that is wrong and unrelibale. Please allow official sites be used AVGEEK7813 ( talk) 09:23, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
straightforward, descriptive statements of factslike whether that airport has certain flights. – Joe ( talk) 10:13, 9 July 2024 (UTC)