This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Templates for discussion page. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
To help centralise discussions and keep related topics together, the following pages redirect here: |
V | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CfD | 0 | 0 | 16 | 3 | 19 |
TfD | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 9 |
MfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
FfD | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
RfD | 0 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 10 |
AfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Working/Manual § Other. Specifically, please see entry on the list entitled Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 13#Category:Harold B. Lee Library-related film articles. (I am leaving this note here because it involves templates and XfD.) Thanks! House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 18:58, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Template:Tfd top uses background color #e3f9df (as of Special:Permalink/1172064855). Part of the template's text is the red "Please do not modify it.", which looks like this:
This combination of colors – background #e3f9df and foreground #ff0000 – is not very readable. It fails WCAG for normal text in a contrast checker.
In the interest of accessibility, I suggest changing the colors. For example, the foreground color can be changed to maroon (aka #800000 ):
which passes the contrast check. You can see how maroon looks with the whole text in the sandbox. — andrybak ( talk) 20:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
we might as well change all of the affected templates– sure, I'll go be BOLD.
why is this thread small?– because it's out of scope. Important enough to be mentioned, but not important enough to have normal text size. — andrybak ( talk) 19:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
standard red for errors and other eye-catching text of a warning nature. The closed color is not? Do you mean that the chosen maroon color is not eye-catching? — andrybak ( talk) 20:49, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at WT:Deletion process § Deletion sorting should be advertised on all XFD venues. Nickps ( talk) 21:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
{{ d MENA topic}} The template was deemed delete-able mostly for not being in use, and is now on a list of things to remove from pages, this is a bit contradictory. MWQs ( talk) 06:29, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Templates for discussion page. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
To help centralise discussions and keep related topics together, the following pages redirect here: |
V | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CfD | 0 | 0 | 16 | 3 | 19 |
TfD | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 9 |
MfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
FfD | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
RfD | 0 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 10 |
AfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Working/Manual § Other. Specifically, please see entry on the list entitled Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 13#Category:Harold B. Lee Library-related film articles. (I am leaving this note here because it involves templates and XfD.) Thanks! House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 18:58, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Template:Tfd top uses background color #e3f9df (as of Special:Permalink/1172064855). Part of the template's text is the red "Please do not modify it.", which looks like this:
This combination of colors – background #e3f9df and foreground #ff0000 – is not very readable. It fails WCAG for normal text in a contrast checker.
In the interest of accessibility, I suggest changing the colors. For example, the foreground color can be changed to maroon (aka #800000 ):
which passes the contrast check. You can see how maroon looks with the whole text in the sandbox. — andrybak ( talk) 20:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
we might as well change all of the affected templates– sure, I'll go be BOLD.
why is this thread small?– because it's out of scope. Important enough to be mentioned, but not important enough to have normal text size. — andrybak ( talk) 19:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
standard red for errors and other eye-catching text of a warning nature. The closed color is not? Do you mean that the chosen maroon color is not eye-catching? — andrybak ( talk) 20:49, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at WT:Deletion process § Deletion sorting should be advertised on all XFD venues. Nickps ( talk) 21:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
{{ d MENA topic}} The template was deemed delete-able mostly for not being in use, and is now on a list of things to remove from pages, this is a bit contradictory. MWQs ( talk) 06:29, 17 June 2024 (UTC)