![]() | This page was nominated for deletion on 6 May 2024. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() |
Essays Low‑impact ![]() | |||||||||
|
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Stress marks in East Slavic words page. |
|
Archives:
Index,
1Auto-archiving period: 365 days
![]() |
![]() | On 23 July 2023, it was proposed that this page be moved to Wikipedia:Stress marks in Russian and Ukrainian words. The result of the discussion was moved to Wikipedia:Stress marks in East Slavic words. |
The result of the move request was: moved to Wikipedia:Stress marks in East Slavic words per WP:NOTCURRENTTITLE. ( closed by non-admin page mover) – Material Works 19:42, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Stress marks in Russian words → Wikipedia:Stress marks in Russian and Ukrainian words – The native convention is practically the same in Ukrainian as in Russian. This advice should be expanded to cover both.
I presume it might be similar in Belarusian too, so perhaps it should be moved to Stress marks in Belarusian, Russian, and Ukrainian words or Stress marks in East Slavic words. Or is it still more broadly used? — Michael Z. 19:00, 23 July 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. – Material Works 20:48, 3 August 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE 20:17, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
|lang=
.) I'd appreciate it if someone comes up with more ideas. —
Mike Novikoff
23:15, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
This is not a community-vetted guideline and one cannot make massive changes in Wikipedia citing this page. There is an established procedure to promote essays to guideline status, WP:PROPOSAL. If one is seriously concerned with this issue, please do this.
P.S. I am not particularly in favor of stress marks and probably vote against them, but I am against massive changes without establishing a community-wide consensus. - Altenmann >talk 18:22, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Since the RfC below is inextricably linked to the preceding discussion it makes the most sense to evaluate them as a singular whole. Many RfC comments explicitly invoked the preceding discussion so it would be inappropriate to apply a formal close to the RfC only, so there would be even more than five participants.
this discussion can be linked as normal to demonstrate this interpretation has consensus support). Malerisch ( talk) 00:32, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
If yoiu continue reverting my edits, I report you for the voiolation of the WP:OWN policy. First time I was reverted because I assume there was no reference. Now I added text with reference. If you have objections, state them, not play revert wars. - Altenmann >talk 18:27, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
The edit summary was "and realize that this essay was *never* meant to advocate and promote *any* usage of stress marks at all" - as clear a statement of ownership as it can be, which is inadmissible in a cooperative project of Wikipedia. If you want to remove something, you have to have stronger objections that WP:IDONTLIKEIT. - Altenmann >talk 18:31, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
In the 2021 MoS RfC the vast majority was for retaining stress marks however hard you were pushing your opinion. - Altenmann >talk 18:37, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
<
s>
there?And I just wonder why you are so aggressive if we already agree on a most important point (quoting your words): I am personally nearly always against stress marks, because in 99.9% it is original research and wikipedia is not dictionary. — Mike Novikoff 23:15, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This page was nominated for deletion on 6 May 2024. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() |
Essays Low‑impact ![]() | |||||||||
|
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Stress marks in East Slavic words page. |
|
Archives:
Index,
1Auto-archiving period: 365 days
![]() |
![]() | On 23 July 2023, it was proposed that this page be moved to Wikipedia:Stress marks in Russian and Ukrainian words. The result of the discussion was moved to Wikipedia:Stress marks in East Slavic words. |
The result of the move request was: moved to Wikipedia:Stress marks in East Slavic words per WP:NOTCURRENTTITLE. ( closed by non-admin page mover) – Material Works 19:42, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Stress marks in Russian words → Wikipedia:Stress marks in Russian and Ukrainian words – The native convention is practically the same in Ukrainian as in Russian. This advice should be expanded to cover both.
I presume it might be similar in Belarusian too, so perhaps it should be moved to Stress marks in Belarusian, Russian, and Ukrainian words or Stress marks in East Slavic words. Or is it still more broadly used? — Michael Z. 19:00, 23 July 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. – Material Works 20:48, 3 August 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE 20:17, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
|lang=
.) I'd appreciate it if someone comes up with more ideas. —
Mike Novikoff
23:15, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
This is not a community-vetted guideline and one cannot make massive changes in Wikipedia citing this page. There is an established procedure to promote essays to guideline status, WP:PROPOSAL. If one is seriously concerned with this issue, please do this.
P.S. I am not particularly in favor of stress marks and probably vote against them, but I am against massive changes without establishing a community-wide consensus. - Altenmann >talk 18:22, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Since the RfC below is inextricably linked to the preceding discussion it makes the most sense to evaluate them as a singular whole. Many RfC comments explicitly invoked the preceding discussion so it would be inappropriate to apply a formal close to the RfC only, so there would be even more than five participants.
this discussion can be linked as normal to demonstrate this interpretation has consensus support). Malerisch ( talk) 00:32, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
If yoiu continue reverting my edits, I report you for the voiolation of the WP:OWN policy. First time I was reverted because I assume there was no reference. Now I added text with reference. If you have objections, state them, not play revert wars. - Altenmann >talk 18:27, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
The edit summary was "and realize that this essay was *never* meant to advocate and promote *any* usage of stress marks at all" - as clear a statement of ownership as it can be, which is inadmissible in a cooperative project of Wikipedia. If you want to remove something, you have to have stronger objections that WP:IDONTLIKEIT. - Altenmann >talk 18:31, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
In the 2021 MoS RfC the vast majority was for retaining stress marks however hard you were pushing your opinion. - Altenmann >talk 18:37, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
<
s>
there?And I just wonder why you are so aggressive if we already agree on a most important point (quoting your words): I am personally nearly always against stress marks, because in 99.9% it is original research and wikipedia is not dictionary. — Mike Novikoff 23:15, 11 May 2024 (UTC)