![]() | This is an RfA talk page.
While
voting and most discussion should occur on the main RfA page, sometimes discussions stray off-topic or otherwise clutter that page. The RfA talk page serves to unclutter the main RfA page by hosting discussions that are not related to the candidacy.
|
Steel1943 ( t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created ( xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ( blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
as of 14:55, 11 July 2016 (UTC) per xTools added by -- samtar talk or stalk 14:55, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
First edit: Oct 21, 2011, 2:18 PM Latest edit: Jul 11, 2016, 5:10 AM Live edits: 64,832 Deleted edits: 9,625 Total edits: 74,457 Unique pages edited: 33,699 Pages created: 7,380 Pages moved: 3,589 Ø edits per page: 1.9 Files uploaded: 89 Files uploaded (Commons): 2 Reverted edits: 196 Edits with summary: 63,777 Number of minor edits (tagged): 6,184
As of 11 July 2016, using toollabs:musikanimal/nonautomated_edits:
— MusikAnimal talk 15:30, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Oppose - per past RfA comments by the candidate, I feel like they do not understand what adminship is. Commenting on the % of edits to the user talk space is clearly unrelated to whether or not a candidate would make a good administrator, and it makes me concerned that Steel views the role too much like a job or status symbol, rather than a few extra tools that allow people to help more. We don't need that; we need people that recognise that Wikipedia is a hobby, and that being an administrator is no big deal. Ajraddatz ( talk) 16:34, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This is an RfA talk page.
While
voting and most discussion should occur on the main RfA page, sometimes discussions stray off-topic or otherwise clutter that page. The RfA talk page serves to unclutter the main RfA page by hosting discussions that are not related to the candidacy.
|
Steel1943 ( t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created ( xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ( blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
as of 14:55, 11 July 2016 (UTC) per xTools added by -- samtar talk or stalk 14:55, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
First edit: Oct 21, 2011, 2:18 PM Latest edit: Jul 11, 2016, 5:10 AM Live edits: 64,832 Deleted edits: 9,625 Total edits: 74,457 Unique pages edited: 33,699 Pages created: 7,380 Pages moved: 3,589 Ø edits per page: 1.9 Files uploaded: 89 Files uploaded (Commons): 2 Reverted edits: 196 Edits with summary: 63,777 Number of minor edits (tagged): 6,184
As of 11 July 2016, using toollabs:musikanimal/nonautomated_edits:
— MusikAnimal talk 15:30, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Oppose - per past RfA comments by the candidate, I feel like they do not understand what adminship is. Commenting on the % of edits to the user talk space is clearly unrelated to whether or not a candidate would make a good administrator, and it makes me concerned that Steel views the role too much like a job or status symbol, rather than a few extra tools that allow people to help more. We don't need that; we need people that recognise that Wikipedia is a hobby, and that being an administrator is no big deal. Ajraddatz ( talk) 16:34, 11 July 2016 (UTC)