From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
User:EnSamulili

      run at Fri Sep 28 16:08:00 2007 GMT

Category:	1
Image:	1
Mainspace	481
Talk:	71
Template talk:	1
User talk:	15
User:	12
Wikipedia talk:	5
Wikipedia:	91
avg edits per page	1.31
earliest	17:45, 13 January 2005
number of unique pages	516
total	678

2005/1 	111 	
2005/2 	23 	
2005/3 	118 	
2005/4 	73 	
2005/5 	36 	
2005/6 	75 	
2005/7 	89 	
2005/8 	33 	
2005/9 	19 	
2005/10 	12 	
2005/11 	17 	
2005/12 	23 	
2006/1 	11 	
2006/2 	23 	
2006/3 	0 	
2006/4 	0 	
2006/5 	4 	
2006/6 	11

User:Samulili

      run at Fri Sep 28 16:07:58 2007 GMT

Category:	1
Image:	11
Mainspace	344
Talk:	32
Template talk:	2
Template:	9
User talk:	39
User:	5
Wikipedia talk:	12
Wikipedia:	17
avg edits per page	1.39
earliest	09:43, 22 September 2004
number of unique pages	340
total	472

2004/9 	1 	
2004/10 	0 	
2004/11 	0 	
2004/12 	0 	
2005/1 	0 	
2005/2 	0 	
2005/3 	0 	
2005/4 	0 	
2005/5 	0 	
2005/6 	0 	
2005/7 	0 	
2005/8 	0 	
2005/9 	0 	
2005/10 	0 	
2005/11 	0 	
2005/12 	0 	
2006/1 	0 	
2006/2 	9 	
2006/3 	33 	
2006/4 	10 	
2006/5 	6 	
2006/6 	3 	
2006/7 	23 	
2006/8 	44 	
2006/9 	85 	
2006/10 	27 	
2006/11 	14 	
2006/12 	15 	
2007/1 	42 	
2007/2 	30 	
2007/3 	13 	
2007/4 	21 	
2007/5 	27 	
2007/6 	26 	
2007/7 	29 	
2007/8 	5 	
2007/9 	9

Unfair treatment

Very few edits, especially to Wikipedia space (19), not good. Yet this looks like a very positive response from the community. Look at the two RfAs above this one. They all have more Wikipedia-space experience than Samulili, and yet look set to get automatic rejection. I don't see this as fair. How can we let such an inexperienced Wikipedian, who has yet to gain full trust of the community via his edits (which, looking at what is there, aren't bad at all, believe me) obtain adminship? It's madness - in my three or four months of consistent participation on RfA, I've never seen anything like this happen before. The more experienced a user is, the more he'll know when answering the questions, and the more he'll be able to assist as an admin. Lra drama 10:17, 30 September 2007 (UTC) reply

I would advise it is because he has already proved his ability to administrate in (several) other regions of the MediaWiki projects, Commons being his central area of expertise. Considering he only wants to work with images as an admin, and he is an admin on Commons... -- Anonymous Dissident Talk 10:20, 30 September 2007 (UTC) reply
Sorry! Sorry everybody I've been a fool, because I've misread something, which should be obvious to you all. Ignore this rant please! Sorry everybody! Lra drama 10:23, 30 September 2007 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
User:EnSamulili

      run at Fri Sep 28 16:08:00 2007 GMT

Category:	1
Image:	1
Mainspace	481
Talk:	71
Template talk:	1
User talk:	15
User:	12
Wikipedia talk:	5
Wikipedia:	91
avg edits per page	1.31
earliest	17:45, 13 January 2005
number of unique pages	516
total	678

2005/1 	111 	
2005/2 	23 	
2005/3 	118 	
2005/4 	73 	
2005/5 	36 	
2005/6 	75 	
2005/7 	89 	
2005/8 	33 	
2005/9 	19 	
2005/10 	12 	
2005/11 	17 	
2005/12 	23 	
2006/1 	11 	
2006/2 	23 	
2006/3 	0 	
2006/4 	0 	
2006/5 	4 	
2006/6 	11

User:Samulili

      run at Fri Sep 28 16:07:58 2007 GMT

Category:	1
Image:	11
Mainspace	344
Talk:	32
Template talk:	2
Template:	9
User talk:	39
User:	5
Wikipedia talk:	12
Wikipedia:	17
avg edits per page	1.39
earliest	09:43, 22 September 2004
number of unique pages	340
total	472

2004/9 	1 	
2004/10 	0 	
2004/11 	0 	
2004/12 	0 	
2005/1 	0 	
2005/2 	0 	
2005/3 	0 	
2005/4 	0 	
2005/5 	0 	
2005/6 	0 	
2005/7 	0 	
2005/8 	0 	
2005/9 	0 	
2005/10 	0 	
2005/11 	0 	
2005/12 	0 	
2006/1 	0 	
2006/2 	9 	
2006/3 	33 	
2006/4 	10 	
2006/5 	6 	
2006/6 	3 	
2006/7 	23 	
2006/8 	44 	
2006/9 	85 	
2006/10 	27 	
2006/11 	14 	
2006/12 	15 	
2007/1 	42 	
2007/2 	30 	
2007/3 	13 	
2007/4 	21 	
2007/5 	27 	
2007/6 	26 	
2007/7 	29 	
2007/8 	5 	
2007/9 	9

Unfair treatment

Very few edits, especially to Wikipedia space (19), not good. Yet this looks like a very positive response from the community. Look at the two RfAs above this one. They all have more Wikipedia-space experience than Samulili, and yet look set to get automatic rejection. I don't see this as fair. How can we let such an inexperienced Wikipedian, who has yet to gain full trust of the community via his edits (which, looking at what is there, aren't bad at all, believe me) obtain adminship? It's madness - in my three or four months of consistent participation on RfA, I've never seen anything like this happen before. The more experienced a user is, the more he'll know when answering the questions, and the more he'll be able to assist as an admin. Lra drama 10:17, 30 September 2007 (UTC) reply

I would advise it is because he has already proved his ability to administrate in (several) other regions of the MediaWiki projects, Commons being his central area of expertise. Considering he only wants to work with images as an admin, and he is an admin on Commons... -- Anonymous Dissident Talk 10:20, 30 September 2007 (UTC) reply
Sorry! Sorry everybody I've been a fool, because I've misread something, which should be obvious to you all. Ignore this rant please! Sorry everybody! Lra drama 10:23, 30 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook