 | This is an RfA talk page.
While
voting and most discussion should occur on the main RfA page, sometimes discussions stray off-topic or otherwise clutter that page. The RfA talk page serves to unclutter the main RfA page by hosting discussions that are not related to the candidacy.
|
I have to say, as a general rule I find the Neutrals section mostly unhelpful and a bit useless. This is the first time in memory that there's anything worth reading there, and I've read the whole thing at least twice now. Valereee ( talk) 13:11, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- Whereas I often find the neutrals useful from day 2 onwards, but I concur that this is a particular beneficial case. Nosebagbear ( talk) 12:08, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
@ Redrose64: Not that I particularly care, but the numbered list of supports has 196 entries, which is why I changed the tally to 196. I apologize if there's something that I missed or am otherwise not aware of. — SamX [ talk · contribs 18:22, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- @
SamX:
This is entry no. 195. It is the last entry in the Support section. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
19:21, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- AJ29 struck their vote, which currently sits between entries 18 and 19 – it doesn't count, so it's 195. theleekycauldron ( talk • contribs) (she/her) 19:24, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- Weird. It's still rendering as 196 for me, but that's probably because I have Convenient Discussions enabled. It seems to be parsing Serial Number 54129's addendum as another numbered list item, which I overlooked. Sorry about that. — SamX [ talk · contribs 21:48, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
|
| This is an RfA talk page.
While
voting and most discussion should occur on the main RfA page, sometimes discussions stray off-topic or otherwise clutter that page. The RfA talk page serves to unclutter the main RfA page by hosting discussions that are not related to the candidacy.
|
I have to say, as a general rule I find the Neutrals section mostly unhelpful and a bit useless. This is the first time in memory that there's anything worth reading there, and I've read the whole thing at least twice now. Valereee ( talk) 13:11, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- Whereas I often find the neutrals useful from day 2 onwards, but I concur that this is a particular beneficial case. Nosebagbear ( talk) 12:08, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
@ Redrose64: Not that I particularly care, but the numbered list of supports has 196 entries, which is why I changed the tally to 196. I apologize if there's something that I missed or am otherwise not aware of. — SamX [ talk · contribs 18:22, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- @
SamX:
This is entry no. 195. It is the last entry in the Support section. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk)
19:21, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- AJ29 struck their vote, which currently sits between entries 18 and 19 – it doesn't count, so it's 195. theleekycauldron ( talk • contribs) (she/her) 19:24, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- Weird. It's still rendering as 196 for me, but that's probably because I have Convenient Discussions enabled. It seems to be parsing Serial Number 54129's addendum as another numbered list item, which I overlooked. Sorry about that. — SamX [ talk · contribs 21:48, 8 August 2023 (UTC)