User:Berig

   run at Sat Oct 25 20:51:21 2008 GMT

   Category:              57
   Image:                 155
   Mainspace              12373
   Portal:                2
   Talk:                  3681
   Template talk:         131
   Template:              93
   User talk:             963
   User:                  290
   Wikipedia talk:        104
   Wikipedia:             491
   avg edits per page     3.79
   earliest               16:59, 18 August 2006
   number of unique pages 4841
   total                  18340

   2006/8  62
   2006/9  1262
   2006/10 661
   2006/11 1204
   2006/12 859
   2007/1  1646
   2007/2  82
   2007/3  18
   2007/4  274
   2007/5  3000
   2007/6  1943
   2007/7  667
   2007/8  516
   2007/9  253
   2007/10 828
   2007/11 476
   2007/12 87
   2008/1  51
   2008/2  786
   2008/3  691
   2008/4  873
   2008/5  873
   2008/6  425
   2008/7  494
   2008/8  136
   2008/9  118
   2008/10 55

   (green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red
   denotes edits without an edit summary)

             Mainspace
   375 [2]Greece Runestones
   307 [3]Hro�gar
   194 [4]Ingvar Runestones
   174 [5]Beowulf
   170 [6]Varangian Runestones
   159 [7]Runestone
   132 [8]England Runestones
   129 [9]Jarlabanke Runestones
   126 [10]Viking Runestones
   120 [11]Viking funeral
   102 [12]D�s
   101 [13]V�lva
   100 [14]Halga
   95  [15]Eadgils
   82  [16]Swedes (Germanic tribe)

                 Talk:
   96 [17]King of the Geats
   90 [18]Eadgils
   85 [19]Estonian pirates
   76 [20]Old Norse
   65 [21]House of Muns�
   65 [22]Beowulf
   63 [23]Germanic peoples
   58 [24]Swedes (Germanic tribe)
   51 [25]History of Sweden (800-1521)
   42 [26]Ragnvald Ulfsson
   33 [27]Br�singamen
   29 [28]Gothiscandza
   29 [29]Goths
   28 [30]Kj�rr
   27 [31]Scandinavia

                    Category:
   5 [32]Rune- and picture stones on Gotland
   5 [33]Danish Runic Inscriptions
   4 [34]Runestones, Estrid
   4 [35]Geats
   3 [36]Heroes in Norse myths and legends
   3 [37]Varangians
   2 [38]Jutes
   2 [39]Ha�uwulf's runestones
   2 [40]Runestones raised in memory of women
   2 [41]English heroic legends
   2 [42]People in Norse mythology and legends
   2 [43]Viking Age women
   2 [44]Runestones in memory of Viking warriors
   2 [45]Runestones in Sm�land

                 Image:
   7 [46]Uffe den spake.jpg
   7 [47]Skjold kaares til konge.jpg
   5 [48]Haugsetting2.jpg
   5 [49]Hr�lfr Kraki's last stand.jpg
   4 [50]Eric the victorious.jpg
   4 [51]Haugsetting.jpg
   4 [52]England runestones.jpg
   3 [53]Eric's kingdom (870s).png
   3 [54]Greece runestones.JPG
   3 [55]Norns1.jpg
   3 [56]Bloodeagle.jpg
   2 [57]Dalrunor.png
   2 [58]C.F. Christensen 1833.jpg
   2 [59]Dotted m-rune.jpg
   2 [60]Norns3by CEBrock.jpg

                       Portal:
   2 [61]Ancient Germanic culture/Selected picture/3

                         Template:
   11 [62]Runestones
   8  [63]Infobox Runestone
   7  [64]Uruz infobox
   6  [65]Myarchive
   4  [66]Germanic peoples
   3  [67]WPMILHIST Announcements/Nordic military history
   3  [68]Othalan infobox
   3  [69]V�lsung
   3  [70]Germanic tribes (750 BC - 1 AD)
   3  [71]Hrethling
   3  [72]Ansuz infobox
   2  [73]Scandinavia
   2  [74]Odin
   2  [75]Ingwaz infobox
   2  [76]Germanic philology

               Template talk:
   109 [77]Did you know
   16  [78]Germanic peoples
   4   [79]Germanic tribes (750 BC - 1 AD)
   2   [80]Germanic philology

           User:
   206 [81]Berig/workspace
   75  [82]Berig
   2   [83]Drieakko
   2   [84]Pia L

              User talk:
   294 [85]Berig
   86  [86]Haukurth
   41  [87]Pia L
   41  [88]Varoon Arya
   39  [89]Briangotts
   37  [90]Bloodofox
   32  [91]Dbachmann
   19  [92]Dr Steven Plunkett
   17  [93]Frater Xyzzy
   14  [94]Ghirlandajo
   14  [95]Skadinaujo
   13  [96]Goldenrowley
   11  [97]Grimhelm
   11  [98]Drieakko
   11  [99]FrummerThanThou/Archive 1

                                 Wikipedia:
   31 [100]WikiProject Norse history and culture
   28 [101]Fringe theories/Noticeboard
   18 [102]WikiProject Ancient Germanic studies/Runes
   10 [103]Peer review/Hro�gar/archive1
   10 [104]Featured article review/Sverre of Norway/archive1
   7  [105]Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
   6  [106]Requests for adminship/Berig
   6  [107]Reliable sources/Noticeboard
   4  [108]WikiProject Military history/Nordic military history task force
   4  [109]Articles for deletion/Britney Spears Song
   4  [110]Deletion review/Log/2008 July 25
   4  [111]Articles for deletion/BSAUA
   4  [112]Articles for deletion/Psilalonia Square
   4  [113]Images and media for deletion/2008 June 20
   4  [114]WikiProject Ancient Germanic studies

                              Wikipedia talk:
   33 [115]WikiProject Military history/Nordic military history task force
   21 [116]WikiProject Ancient Germanic studies
   18 [117]WikiProject Norse history and culture
   11 [118]WikiProject Ancient Germanic studies/Runes
   7  [119]Good articles
   5  [120]Swedish Wikipedians' notice board/Terminology
   2  [121]Civility
   2  [122]Reliable sources
   2  [123]Footnotes

   If there were any problems, please [124]email Interiot or post at
   [125]User talk:Interiot.

• The edit count was retrieved from this link at 20:51, 25 October 2008 (UTC).

Just wondering, but how long did it take you to write that? RockManQ ^(talk) 01:35, 27 October 2008 (UTC) reply

I did not time myself, but I would say several minutes as I looked at every discussion in which we both participated, checked block logs, looked over the candidate's userpage, wrote up a thorough comment as I did so, proofread it, etc. I figure if I am going to bother to comment in these, I want to make sure I add something new to the discussion that someone else has not yet said and that is comprehensive enough to be fair and clear. Best, -- A Nobody ^{My talk} 01:59, 27 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Heh, might just be me, but it always seems your rationales keep getting longer (support or oppose). Not that that's a bad thing. RockManQ ^(talk) 02:36, 27 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Well, if I just said oppose for the reasons I wanted to oppose, someone would say here or on my talk page that I am only opposing because we disagreed in certain discussions, which wouldn't actually be true, because I never really just consider one aspect of an admin candidate when I look at them for an RfA. So, I increasingly find myself having to make as comprehensive of a rationale as possible. Plus, as I indicate in my oppose, I really do value well thought out and unique contributions to discussions and think it's important to present information and ideas not considered by others. But I better stop myself from rambling! :) -- A Nobody ^{My talk} 03:31, 27 October 2008 (UTC) reply

I have no problem with longer reationales---especially in the oppose section. It shows that the person did in fact research the candidate before !voting. It also substantiates the !vote. I'd rather see a long well reasoned rationale, than a short "Oppose, don't like how candidates votes at AfD's."--- Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 05:15, 27 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Detailed (rather than merely "long" - substance is the key) rationales can influence other editors, which is useful, and can be very helpful to Crats. -- Dweller ( talk) 20:33, 30 October 2008 (UTC) reply