Howdy folks.
Looking at the article backlog graph, I think we need to have 3–4 article only backlog drives a year to maintain our current backlog levels and prevent major backlog growth. 4 backlog drives a year is too many for burnout reasons. So I think we should consider 3 backlog drives a year that focus on articles only (no redirects). That's a cadence of one every 4 months. Our last one was in January, so that would mean we should look into doing another backlog drive in May.
Thoughts on this? Shall we move forward, or do we need to adjust the details? Thanks. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 08:10, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
I propose awarding 1 point per review. – DreamRimmer ( talk) 04:11, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Would autopatrolled AfC reviews be counted in this drive because I remembered from last time this wasn't the case. I know it may be hard to calculate but if not too hard it would be appreciated. — GMH Melbourne ( talk) 01:06, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello reviewers! I was just wondering if the bot provides a constant update or if it only works when someone runs it? Thanks! —asparagusus (interaction) sprouts! 00:20, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Do admins participating in the drive get points for speedy deletion of pages without a tag (which non-admins would tag)? I can envision this in several cases, such as obvious G1/G2/G3/G10/G12 where placing a tag would be an unnecessary added step, and cleaning up G5 candidates created by already-blocked socks. To be clear, I'm asking about outright deletion, not merely processing CSD tags placed by other reviewers. Complex/ Rational 18:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
can someone mark TG Sokół Sokołów Małopolski as patrolled for some reason I can, I get the following message:
An error occurred while marking the page as reviewed: [56c8d3a4-a3ea-4cc2-9dce-677e407d1687] Caught exception of type JobQueueError
FuzzyMagma ( talk) 13:19, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
'''[[
User:CanonNi]]'''
(
talk|
contribs)
13:43, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Hi TheTechie. Just want to give a quick ping on Connecteam, I have nominated it for deletion as I don't believe the sources available meet guidelines for notability, when considering the detailed criteria at WP:ORGCRIT. More specifically, the available coverage seems to fall largely within what is specified under WP:ORGTRIV (not that that's an exaustive list). The re-review instructions say that I'm supposed to raise it here. Please let me know if you have any concerns. Alpha3031 ( t • c) 13:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Here are my CSD and PROD logs: User:TheTechie/CSD log User:TheTechie/PROD log thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 16:53, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Please make sure to post if you have deletion logs that need to be accounted for. Reasons for this would typically include manually tagging pages and using Twinkle to tag pages instead of the page curation bar. Hey man im josh ( talk) 12:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Hilst
[talk]
13:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Howdy folks.
Looking at the article backlog graph, I think we need to have 3–4 article only backlog drives a year to maintain our current backlog levels and prevent major backlog growth. 4 backlog drives a year is too many for burnout reasons. So I think we should consider 3 backlog drives a year that focus on articles only (no redirects). That's a cadence of one every 4 months. Our last one was in January, so that would mean we should look into doing another backlog drive in May.
Thoughts on this? Shall we move forward, or do we need to adjust the details? Thanks. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 08:10, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
I propose awarding 1 point per review. – DreamRimmer ( talk) 04:11, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Would autopatrolled AfC reviews be counted in this drive because I remembered from last time this wasn't the case. I know it may be hard to calculate but if not too hard it would be appreciated. — GMH Melbourne ( talk) 01:06, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello reviewers! I was just wondering if the bot provides a constant update or if it only works when someone runs it? Thanks! —asparagusus (interaction) sprouts! 00:20, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Do admins participating in the drive get points for speedy deletion of pages without a tag (which non-admins would tag)? I can envision this in several cases, such as obvious G1/G2/G3/G10/G12 where placing a tag would be an unnecessary added step, and cleaning up G5 candidates created by already-blocked socks. To be clear, I'm asking about outright deletion, not merely processing CSD tags placed by other reviewers. Complex/ Rational 18:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
can someone mark TG Sokół Sokołów Małopolski as patrolled for some reason I can, I get the following message:
An error occurred while marking the page as reviewed: [56c8d3a4-a3ea-4cc2-9dce-677e407d1687] Caught exception of type JobQueueError
FuzzyMagma ( talk) 13:19, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
'''[[
User:CanonNi]]'''
(
talk|
contribs)
13:43, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Hi TheTechie. Just want to give a quick ping on Connecteam, I have nominated it for deletion as I don't believe the sources available meet guidelines for notability, when considering the detailed criteria at WP:ORGCRIT. More specifically, the available coverage seems to fall largely within what is specified under WP:ORGTRIV (not that that's an exaustive list). The re-review instructions say that I'm supposed to raise it here. Please let me know if you have any concerns. Alpha3031 ( t • c) 13:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Here are my CSD and PROD logs: User:TheTechie/CSD log User:TheTechie/PROD log thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 16:53, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Please make sure to post if you have deletion logs that need to be accounted for. Reasons for this would typically include manually tagging pages and using Twinkle to tag pages instead of the page curation bar. Hey man im josh ( talk) 12:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Hilst
[talk]
13:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)