It should go without saying, but an involved editor should not alter the valid close of an MFD discussion merely because they dispute some aspect of. It is certainly not appropriate to do so once another editor has challenged the accuracy of the alterations. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) ( talk) 21:10, 29 August 2015 (UTC) reply

Hullaballoo Wolfowitz, you got what you wanted. Your behavior, stalking me, trolling, edit war against me - I showed that you're wrong. Page was speedily deleted per CSD U1: "user request to delete page in own userspace" - I changed my mind to show what you is doing. But, Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Subtropical-man/Catfight is closed without consensus and outside administrators, page was speedily deleted per CSD U1: "user request to delete page in own userspace" - please inquire administrator who deleted page - CSD U1, not Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Subtropical-man/Catfight. I just wanted to add the information [1] but no. You prefer trolling and edit-war. Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 21:16, 29 August 2015 (UTC) reply

HW isn't stalking nor trolling you, Your amended close is unnaceptable hence it being reverted period. – Davey2010 ^Talk 21:32, 29 August 2015 (UTC) reply

Hullaballoo Wolfowitz and me are in a conflict for some time, please refrain from editing related to my person. On en.Wikipedia there are 119,755 active registered users [2], if I do something wrong - many users react, but not you and your porn-delecionist friends. No offence. Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 21:50, 29 August 2015 (UTC) reply

Dude Wikipedia is a big fucking place so ofcourse we're always gonna bump in to each!, No offence but that's because we all learn from our mistakes, You on the otherhand make one daft mistake and then make it again and again and again (Your actions at this MFD are a perfect example (Sure I perhaps haven't been brilliant here either but I did stop after the second revert and tried to seek help elsewhere - You on the otherhand kept reverting and edit warring.), Instead of palming the blame on everyone else all the time you might wanna take a closer look at yourself!, I'm done wasting time on this crap and I think it's fair to say so has everyone else. – Davey2010 ^Talk 01:06, 30 August 2015 (UTC) reply

Dear @ Davey2010:, if some user with someone in conflict, try to avoid and even ask other users for mediation. I suggest write the fact in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Subtropical-man/Catfight: "speedily deleted by GB fan per CSD U1 (user request to delete page in own userspace)" without false and incorrect and controversy "The result of the discussion was speedily deleted". After, I delete my page, simply. Also, after we say goodbye and we will stay away from each other, for calmness. Ok, dude? Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 17:41, 30 August 2015 (UTC) reply

@ Hullaballoo Wolfowitz: Simply, you make a mistake [3]. I showed you clearly, page was speedily deleted per CSD U1: "user request to delete page in own userspace" - please inquire administrator who deleted page - what reason to delete: CSD U1 or Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Subtropical-man/Catfight. I can restore own page because page was speedily deleted per CSD U1: "user request", not your false and incorrect "result of the discussion was speedily deleted on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Subtropical-man/Catfight. Your mistake is obvious. I hope that you understand it, if you fix own a mistake [4], I consider remove page. Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 21:34, 29 August 2015 (UTC) reply

Gentlemen, this really isn't an important hill to die on. The hill will be 937m tall regardless of who holds it, and this userspace article will still be deleted no matter who claims impetus/credit for it. Let's all just trudge onward. Tarc ( talk) 21:35, 29 August 2015 (UTC) reply

I just wanted to add an explanation/clarification about delete [5] but Davey2010 (twice) and Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (twice) reverted my change. How do I feel? How? Reverted my edit and enter false information about delete page. I restore page and showed clearly: they were wrong: page was speedily deleted per CSD U1: "user request to delete page in own userspace", not Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Subtropical-man/Catfight. I try to be reasonable, I am willing to solve the problem. I suggest write the truth in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Subtropical-man/Catfight: "speedily deleted by GB fan per CSD U1 (user request to delete page in own userspace)" without false and incorrect "The result of the discussion was speedily deleted.... by GB fan per CSD U1 (user request to delete page in own userspace)". After fixed it - I'll remove this page and close this case. @ Gene93k: or other, please delete the false words of "The result of the discussion was". Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 21:40, 29 August 2015 (UTC) reply

@ Hullaballoo Wolfowitz: please stop trolling [6]. I not deleted "a page to prevent an MFD consensus from being recognized, then restoring it after the MFD has closed" (see your a description of changes) - I want delete page because I decided that page is unnecessary for me. But, you prefer trolling, edit warring and stalking me, you joined to edit-war (you reverted my informations and enter false information about delete page)... and I changed my mind about page. Simply. Please see my post above, I suggest write the truth in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Subtropical-man/Catfight: "speedily deleted by GB fan per CSD U1 (user request to delete page in own userspace)" without false and incorrect "The result of the discussion was speedily deleted". After, I delete my page, simply. Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 17:27, 30 August 2015 (UTC) reply