I have archived the (long) discussion page since it's been dead for quite some time. As discussions seem to go in rounds and rounds and lead nowhere I have decided to be bold and finalize the debates. Two times editors voted, and it seems we have a pretty good consensus, so let's try one more time. Renata 02:06, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Okay this page has (yet again) become inactive, There is an immense amount of opposition to the changes proposed, I move to dismiss this proposal and archive it; furthermore as consensus has proven so far fair use images in lists are acceptable and they do pass the FUC so I also move to reinstate the screen captures on List of Lost episodes. thanks/ Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 13:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
It would be great if we could settle this. Maybe we could switch the argument to how much text is required for an image. I know WP doesn't like hard number minimums, but if we could decide how much text is required per screenshot, it would give us an easy way to decide delete/keep. - Peregrinefisher 04:23, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Yup, absolutely dismiss it. Cburnett 01:19, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Currently these articles have loads of FU images. Can somebody tell me on how to minimize/remove them? -- Howard the Duck 16:15, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
As I've explained in this very debate (fair use in lists) many times: FUC#3 does not apply because each individual episode is individually copyrighted. This means the copyrights are not linked and you cannot aggregate the number of images used. The minimum is one per copyrighted work not article. If we can just start linking works together then I hereby bind everything to Romeo and Juliet and declare everything public domain. See, it doesn't work like that. Episode 101 of a TV show is no more bound or linked to episode 102 or The Brady Bunch. It just doesn't make sense! Cburnett 03:37, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
I have archived the (long) discussion page since it's been dead for quite some time. As discussions seem to go in rounds and rounds and lead nowhere I have decided to be bold and finalize the debates. Two times editors voted, and it seems we have a pretty good consensus, so let's try one more time. Renata 02:06, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Okay this page has (yet again) become inactive, There is an immense amount of opposition to the changes proposed, I move to dismiss this proposal and archive it; furthermore as consensus has proven so far fair use images in lists are acceptable and they do pass the FUC so I also move to reinstate the screen captures on List of Lost episodes. thanks/ Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 13:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
It would be great if we could settle this. Maybe we could switch the argument to how much text is required for an image. I know WP doesn't like hard number minimums, but if we could decide how much text is required per screenshot, it would give us an easy way to decide delete/keep. - Peregrinefisher 04:23, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Yup, absolutely dismiss it. Cburnett 01:19, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Currently these articles have loads of FU images. Can somebody tell me on how to minimize/remove them? -- Howard the Duck 16:15, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
As I've explained in this very debate (fair use in lists) many times: FUC#3 does not apply because each individual episode is individually copyrighted. This means the copyrights are not linked and you cannot aggregate the number of images used. The minimum is one per copyrighted work not article. If we can just start linking works together then I hereby bind everything to Romeo and Juliet and declare everything public domain. See, it doesn't work like that. Episode 101 of a TV show is no more bound or linked to episode 102 or The Brady Bunch. It just doesn't make sense! Cburnett 03:37, 25 January 2007 (UTC)