This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
– This proxy check request is closed and will soon be archived by a bot.
Reason: Suspicious edits Étienne Dolet ( talk) 04:44, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
– This proxy check request is closed and will soon be archived by a bot.
– This proxy check request is closed and will soon be archived by a bot.
Reason: Requested unblock at User talk:Nergaal#?. IP blocked by ProcSeeBot on 6 April. If there is a problem with the IP, is there any reason not to give this user IPBE? They have been here since 2007 and seem to be in good standing. JohnCD ( talk) 16:21, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
– This proxy check request is closed and will soon be archived by a bot.
Reason: Suspicious edits/editing from a confirmed corporate proxy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GabeMc ( talk • contribs)
– This proxy check request is closed and will soon be archived by a bot.
Reason: Requested unblock via UTRS.-- Jezebel'sPonyo bons mots 16:38, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
– This proxy check request is closed and will soon be archived by a bot.
Reason: There are suspicions at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheREALCableGuy that some of these may be open proxies. I was not able to find evidence for any of them; maybe people here can do better. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:33, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
– This proxy check request is closed and will soon be archived by a bot.
Reason: Suspicious edits
– This proxy check request is closed and will soon be archived by a bot.
Reason: Likely proxy-using ref-desk troll we've been having lots of trouble from lately, based on edits. -- Jayron 32 03:54, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
– This proxy check request is closed and will soon be archived by a bot.
I asked him this and he says "Because it gives me a stable machine on a stable IP." Daniel Case ( talk) 02:13, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
– This proxy check request is closed and will soon be archived by a bot.
Says servers are a university's that were incorrectly blocked. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:50, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
– This proxy check request is closed and will soon be archived by a bot.
Reason: See these recent edits to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/L'Aquotique ( [2], [3]) from impersonating Materialscientist. Additionally, per http://ping.eu/proxy/ 175.28.15.91 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) is a proxy for port 80. JoeSperrazza ( talk) 21:20, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
– This proxy check request is closed and will soon be archived by a bot.
Reason: Suspicious edits
See 3RR report closed on 29 June (permalink). The first IP who joined in the edit war, 190.102.28.173 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is advertised on the web as being a proxy server offered by http://letushide.com, though I wasn't able to activate it. The second IP, 92.46.132.40 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is on various anti-spam lists but not widely advertised as a proxy. EdJohnston ( talk) 02:25, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
– This proxy check request is closed and will soon be archived by a bot.
Reason: Suspicious edits Étienne Dolet ( talk) 04:44, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
– This proxy check request is closed and will soon be archived by a bot.
– This proxy check request is closed and will soon be archived by a bot.
Reason: Requested unblock at User talk:Nergaal#?. IP blocked by ProcSeeBot on 6 April. If there is a problem with the IP, is there any reason not to give this user IPBE? They have been here since 2007 and seem to be in good standing. JohnCD ( talk) 16:21, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
– This proxy check request is closed and will soon be archived by a bot.
Reason: Suspicious edits/editing from a confirmed corporate proxy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GabeMc ( talk • contribs)
– This proxy check request is closed and will soon be archived by a bot.
Reason: Requested unblock via UTRS.-- Jezebel'sPonyo bons mots 16:38, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
– This proxy check request is closed and will soon be archived by a bot.
Reason: There are suspicions at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheREALCableGuy that some of these may be open proxies. I was not able to find evidence for any of them; maybe people here can do better. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:33, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
– This proxy check request is closed and will soon be archived by a bot.
Reason: Suspicious edits
– This proxy check request is closed and will soon be archived by a bot.
Reason: Likely proxy-using ref-desk troll we've been having lots of trouble from lately, based on edits. -- Jayron 32 03:54, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
– This proxy check request is closed and will soon be archived by a bot.
I asked him this and he says "Because it gives me a stable machine on a stable IP." Daniel Case ( talk) 02:13, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
– This proxy check request is closed and will soon be archived by a bot.
Says servers are a university's that were incorrectly blocked. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:50, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
– This proxy check request is closed and will soon be archived by a bot.
Reason: See these recent edits to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/L'Aquotique ( [2], [3]) from impersonating Materialscientist. Additionally, per http://ping.eu/proxy/ 175.28.15.91 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) is a proxy for port 80. JoeSperrazza ( talk) 21:20, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
– This proxy check request is closed and will soon be archived by a bot.
Reason: Suspicious edits
See 3RR report closed on 29 June (permalink). The first IP who joined in the edit war, 190.102.28.173 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is advertised on the web as being a proxy server offered by http://letushide.com, though I wasn't able to activate it. The second IP, 92.46.132.40 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is on various anti-spam lists but not widely advertised as a proxy. EdJohnston ( talk) 02:25, 30 June 2014 (UTC)